Elite O Line - Winning
Comments
-
Yep. I didn't really give it much thought at the time as I've been underrating Buelow by a lot.AEB said:I noted in October that Buelows injury was big. The stretch beginning against ASU where they blitzed the 0 gap was highly disruptive. We? had no answer. The OL started clicking again once he got back. Losing Mele at the start was a big loss for depth; that showed up when Buelow went down.
-
Early in the Oregon broadcast I thought I heard one of the announcers say “Oregon’s talented defensive line really likes this matchup.” What’s there to like? It’s the best o-line they saw all year.LongDukDong said:Lost in the shuffle is how well our O Line is playing. Elite at this point, easily top 3 in all of CFB.
Due to this factor we should be able to beat Texas similar to Oregon, and control the game. -
Oline silenced Dorlus.
-
Didn’t Kwat have 3-4 seasons with the best defense in the Pac? I don’t think he’s Buddy Ryan or anything but he’s the best D-coordinator we?ve had this century.theknowledge said:Kwat had Vita, Gaines and Levi and Stanfords third string offensive line pushed their shit in. I think this UW team can figure out a way to move the ball.
-
With Lake coaching the secondary, yeah.HonestDon said:
Didn’t Kwat have 3-4 seasons with the best defense in the Pac? I don’t think he’s Buddy Ryan or anything but he’s the best D-coordinator we?ve had this century.theknowledge said:Kwat had Vita, Gaines and Levi and Stanfords third string offensive line pushed their shit in. I think this UW team can figure out a way to move the ball.
-
Nah. Morrell is betterHonestDon said:
Didn’t Kwat have 3-4 seasons with the best defense in the Pac? I don’t think he’s Buddy Ryan or anything but he’s the best D-coordinator we?ve had this century.theknowledge said:Kwat had Vita, Gaines and Levi and Stanfords third string offensive line pushed their shit in. I think this UW team can figure out a way to move the ball.
Undefeated
Kwat losses us multiple games this year
Not as good on paper. Ten times better in high pressure, must get off the field situations -
I kinda agree with this but I see a lot of “DeBoner hired two weak position coaches instead of a good DC” on this board. It worms into my brain—the way the old man used to fall asleep to cable news and wake up with a bunch of hot takes the next day.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Nah. Morrell is betterHonestDon said:
Didn’t Kwat have 3-4 seasons with the best defense in the Pac? I don’t think he’s Buddy Ryan or anything but he’s the best D-coordinator we?ve had this century.theknowledge said:Kwat had Vita, Gaines and Levi and Stanfords third string offensive line pushed their shit in. I think this UW team can figure out a way to move the ball.
Undefeated
Kwat losses us multiple games this year
Not as good on paper. Ten times better in high pressure, must get off the field situations
The narrative in my head all season is Morrell and Inge are mediocre and we should have better.
But can’t argue with 13-0.
-
THIS, boner does not need a DC that has low point average. Boner wants DC that can get his offense a chance to get more possessions. Kawasakis defense was notorious for staying the field and eating away at the clock and then would fold in the end because they are fucking tired in the 4th quarter.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Nah. Morrell is betterHonestDon said:
Didn’t Kwat have 3-4 seasons with the best defense in the Pac? I don’t think he’s Buddy Ryan or anything but he’s the best D-coordinator we?ve had this century.theknowledge said:Kwat had Vita, Gaines and Levi and Stanfords third string offensive line pushed their shit in. I think this UW team can figure out a way to move the ball.
Undefeated
Kwat losses us multiple games this year
Not as good on paper. Ten times better in high pressure, must get off the field situations
