Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
CFP talk... tame track to the Natty?
Comments
-
With UW and Texas winning, here are likely scenarios:
-
NGL, I’d rather face Bama or Georgia for the title game than play them in the Sugar bowl
-
I just don’t see how the committee would leave out a 2 loss Oregon team when those 2 losses are to an undefeated team.Purple_Pills said:With UW and Texas winning, here are likely scenarios:
-
This is the way. We can beat either but would rather face in championship.TheHB said:NGL, I’d rather face Bama or Georgia for the title game than play them in the Sugar bowl
-
17-7 Bama lead at the halfPurple_Pills said:With UW and Texas winning, here are likely scenarios:
-
How can the committee rationally move Alabama ahead of Texas?UWhuskytskeet said:I could see Alabama jumping FSU for #3 because Jordan Travis lost his leg. Playing Bama in NO would not be ideal.
SEC commissioner is already crying about that happening because they know a UGA loss is doomsday for the SEC being in. He is politicking like a scared man right now. That conference is so top heavy. They feed on poverty schools 90% of the year. -
That too -BleachedAnusDawg said:
How can the committee rationally move Alabama ahead of Texas?UWhuskytskeet said:I could see Alabama jumping FSU for #3 because Jordan Travis lost his leg. Playing Bama in NO would not be ideal.
SEC commissioner is already crying about that happening because they know a UGA loss is doomsday for the SEC being in. He is politicking like a scared man right now. That conference is so top heavy. They feed on poverty schools 90% of the year.
Pretty sure all I hear is that the committee won't let Bama leap Texas given the head-to-head. -
I can't find a direct answer whether they can choose, but for sure you get preferential location. I'm guessing you can strongly suggest where you want to play. If Michigan is matched up with Texas, they won't play in NO, for example.TheHB said:
Do they get to choose? I thought it was preordained that 1vs 4 is Sugar and 2 vs 3 is RoseUWhuskytskeet said:
If Michigan is #1, it's definitely possible they play in the Rose Bowl, especially if it's against Bama or FSU. I don't picture a Big10 team choosing the Sugar Bowl over the RB.BroadcastingDawg said:
The game would be at the Rose Bowl. Ain't no way they'd give a 1-loss no. 3 seed that geographical advantage.UWhuskytskeet said:I could see Alabama jumping FSU for #3 because Jordan Travis lost his leg. Playing Bama in NO would not be ideal.
I also just don't see them leaping FSU. -
It's about time the SEC gets fucked.
Pete Carrolls SC was by far the best team multiple years and left out of the natty game thanks to Oregon State or Cal.
It didn't back then, but now the eye test matters because the SEC is on the outs?
You can't put Bama ahead of Texas or why schedule anyone again?
Also play 9 conference games when you have 14 teams. -
Ya I forgot that Texas could be in ahead of them. Bama looks good though. Thank god UW is undefeated and doesn't need to sweat.BleachedAnusDawg said:
How can the committee rationally move Alabama ahead of Texas?UWhuskytskeet said:I could see Alabama jumping FSU for #3 because Jordan Travis lost his leg. Playing Bama in NO would not be ideal.
SEC commissioner is already crying about that happening because they know a UGA loss is doomsday for the SEC being in. He is politicking like a scared man right now. That conference is so top heavy. They feed on poverty schools 90% of the year.
