Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

CFP talk... tame track to the Natty?

So if Alabama wins against Georgia, Florida State beats Louisville, and Michigan takes care of business against Iowa...

Committee will have to decide who gets in as the 4.

QBless FSU would be number no. 3.

CFP would look like this:

1. Michigan vs either 4. Texas/Alabama

2. Washington vs 3. Florida State

I like the odds.
«13456

Comments

  • UWhuskytskeetUWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    I could see Alabama jumping FSU for #3 because Jordan Travis lost his leg. Playing Bama in NO would not be ideal.
  • BroadcastingDawgBroadcastingDawg Member Posts: 1,438
    edited December 2023

    I could see Alabama jumping FSU for #3 because Jordan Travis lost his leg. Playing Bama in NO would not be ideal.

    The game would be at the Rose Bowl. Ain't no way they'd give a 1-loss no. 3 seed that geographical advantage.

    I also just don't see them leaping FSU.
  • TheHBTheHB Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,072 Swaye's Wigwam
    SEC teams get preferential treatment so anything is possible
  • UWhuskytskeetUWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113

    I could see Alabama jumping FSU for #3 because Jordan Travis lost his leg. Playing Bama in NO would not be ideal.

    The game would be at the Rose Bowl. Ain't no way they'd give a 1-loss no. 3 seed that geographical advantage.

    I also just don't see them leaping FSU.
    If Michigan is #1, it's definitely possible they play in the Rose Bowl, especially if it's against Bama or FSU. I don't picture a Big10 team choosing the Sugar Bowl over the RB.
  • TheHBTheHB Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,072 Swaye's Wigwam

    I could see Alabama jumping FSU for #3 because Jordan Travis lost his leg. Playing Bama in NO would not be ideal.

    The game would be at the Rose Bowl. Ain't no way they'd give a 1-loss no. 3 seed that geographical advantage.

    I also just don't see them leaping FSU.
    If Michigan is #1, it's definitely possible they play in the Rose Bowl, especially if it's against Bama or FSU. I don't picture a Big10 team choosing the Sugar Bowl over the RB.
    Do they get to choose? I thought it was preordained that 1vs 4 is Sugar and 2 vs 3 is Rose
  • whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,753 Swaye's Wigwam
    TheHB said:

    SEC teams get preferential treatment so anything is possible

    Might as well give Bama the #1 seed and Sugar Bowl. Anything to keep a traditional B1G-Pac Rose Bowl
  • Mad_SonMad_Son Member Posts: 10,180
    Sark did us the biggest favor in week 2.
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    Tbh, bama is beatable. This is our year, we can play with anyone. The fat Dutchman is hungry and he wants it. He is like Petersen during the early days at Boise State.
  • LongDukDongLongDukDong Member Posts: 1,287
    TheHB said:

    NGL, I’d rather face Bama or Georgia for the title game than play them in the Sugar bowl

    This is the way. We can beat either but would rather face in championship.
  • BroadcastingDawgBroadcastingDawg Member Posts: 1,438

    With UW and Texas winning, here are likely scenarios:

    17-7 Bama lead at the half :#
  • BroadcastingDawgBroadcastingDawg Member Posts: 1,438

    I could see Alabama jumping FSU for #3 because Jordan Travis lost his leg. Playing Bama in NO would not be ideal.

    How can the committee rationally move Alabama ahead of Texas?

    SEC commissioner is already crying about that happening because they know a UGA loss is doomsday for the SEC being in. He is politicking like a scared man right now. That conference is so top heavy. They feed on poverty schools 90% of the year.
    That too -

    Pretty sure all I hear is that the committee won't let Bama leap Texas given the head-to-head.
  • UWhuskytskeetUWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    TheHB said:

    I could see Alabama jumping FSU for #3 because Jordan Travis lost his leg. Playing Bama in NO would not be ideal.

    The game would be at the Rose Bowl. Ain't no way they'd give a 1-loss no. 3 seed that geographical advantage.

    I also just don't see them leaping FSU.
    If Michigan is #1, it's definitely possible they play in the Rose Bowl, especially if it's against Bama or FSU. I don't picture a Big10 team choosing the Sugar Bowl over the RB.
    Do they get to choose? I thought it was preordained that 1vs 4 is Sugar and 2 vs 3 is Rose
    I can't find a direct answer whether they can choose, but for sure you get preferential location. I'm guessing you can strongly suggest where you want to play. If Michigan is matched up with Texas, they won't play in NO, for example.
  • UWhuskytskeetUWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113

    I could see Alabama jumping FSU for #3 because Jordan Travis lost his leg. Playing Bama in NO would not be ideal.

    How can the committee rationally move Alabama ahead of Texas?

    SEC commissioner is already crying about that happening because they know a UGA loss is doomsday for the SEC being in. He is politicking like a scared man right now. That conference is so top heavy. They feed on poverty schools 90% of the year.
    Ya I forgot that Texas could be in ahead of them. Bama looks good though. Thank god UW is undefeated and doesn't need to sweat.
Sign In or Register to comment.