Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Another sad Hopkins product...
BroadcastingDawg
Member Posts: 1,496
I went to the home opener and was able to get a seat about 15 rows up half court for $11. Says a lot about the interest in this team.
On paper, they should be really good. But of course, they're just not.
Koren Johnson had a nice game, dropping some 25 points while leading the point. He got really hot in the second half... drained multiple 3's in a row while mixing in some nice drives to the hoop.
Next game? Koren Johnson starts the game on the bench because transfer guard Sahvir Wheeler didn't play in game 1. That's how you reward 25 points Hop? Starting your home grown talent on the bench in favor of a drive only point guard with turnover issues?
Is it any coincidence that when Hop removes their only real perimeter threat from the starting lineup that the offense goes to shit?
Game 1: 10 of 20 from 3 // Game 2: 3 of 17 from 3 // Game 3: 7 of 24 from 3.
I like Wheeler... I think he's got some nice game. But he's committed 11 turnover in his first 2 games along with 7 personal fouls. He's 1 of 7 from 3. Yet Hopkins makes a roster decision that unilaterally hurts the team.
Bottom line... again, this team has no semblance of an offensive plan. They just run around like chickens with their heads cut off until the prayer of making a shot is eventually answered. There are no sets. There's no plan to get the ball inside on the block. Although... it really wouldn't matter because none of their bigs have any clue about what to do with the ball if they were to get it down there. They aimlessly pass the ball around the perimeter until the shot clock is low enough that someone has to take a 1-on-1. It's just all bad.
On defense, they rarely make a savvy play. They're often caught out of position and haven't got the slightest clue on how to stop a back cut. The amount of times a team runs about 20 off the clock on them and ends up with an easy bucket late or an offensive rebound because UW is so out of position is astonishing. Actually... it's not really because its been a problem since Hop took over. They commit dumb fouls all the f'n time from being out of position and unable to anticipate at all.
Hops 3x transfer guards/small forwards who start in Wheeler, Wood, and Mulcahey are a combined 7 of 29 from 3.... that's 24%... starters, ha.
UW's big men are averaging 5.7, 3.7, and 3.0 points per game - ouch. It's clear Hop has no idea what he has here as they all spend odd lengths of time on the bench - there's just no plan around their use or which sets/players they're most successful with.
It's just all bad man. This team will win some games because there's talent... but that's about all this team has.
On paper, they should be really good. But of course, they're just not.
Koren Johnson had a nice game, dropping some 25 points while leading the point. He got really hot in the second half... drained multiple 3's in a row while mixing in some nice drives to the hoop.
Next game? Koren Johnson starts the game on the bench because transfer guard Sahvir Wheeler didn't play in game 1. That's how you reward 25 points Hop? Starting your home grown talent on the bench in favor of a drive only point guard with turnover issues?
Is it any coincidence that when Hop removes their only real perimeter threat from the starting lineup that the offense goes to shit?
Game 1: 10 of 20 from 3 // Game 2: 3 of 17 from 3 // Game 3: 7 of 24 from 3.
I like Wheeler... I think he's got some nice game. But he's committed 11 turnover in his first 2 games along with 7 personal fouls. He's 1 of 7 from 3. Yet Hopkins makes a roster decision that unilaterally hurts the team.
Bottom line... again, this team has no semblance of an offensive plan. They just run around like chickens with their heads cut off until the prayer of making a shot is eventually answered. There are no sets. There's no plan to get the ball inside on the block. Although... it really wouldn't matter because none of their bigs have any clue about what to do with the ball if they were to get it down there. They aimlessly pass the ball around the perimeter until the shot clock is low enough that someone has to take a 1-on-1. It's just all bad.
On defense, they rarely make a savvy play. They're often caught out of position and haven't got the slightest clue on how to stop a back cut. The amount of times a team runs about 20 off the clock on them and ends up with an easy bucket late or an offensive rebound because UW is so out of position is astonishing. Actually... it's not really because its been a problem since Hop took over. They commit dumb fouls all the f'n time from being out of position and unable to anticipate at all.
Hops 3x transfer guards/small forwards who start in Wheeler, Wood, and Mulcahey are a combined 7 of 29 from 3.... that's 24%... starters, ha.
UW's big men are averaging 5.7, 3.7, and 3.0 points per game - ouch. It's clear Hop has no idea what he has here as they all spend odd lengths of time on the bench - there's just no plan around their use or which sets/players they're most successful with.
It's just all bad man. This team will win some games because there's talent... but that's about all this team has.
Comments
-
16-16. They’ll have a few games where shots fall, Brooks will go off a couple times and they’ll probably win a game or two they shouldn’t but Hopkins is AIDS to consistent winning basketball. Well over a decade of mostly poor and unwatchable basketball at UW. Sad
-
I keep trying to forget we have a basketball team, damn you!
-
And then they beat Xavier in Vegas... Sean Miller led team that won 27 games last year and went to the Sweet 16.
I don't get it.
-
They've got enough talent to beat good teams in spite of the coaching. Also Hop played Koren again, that seems to help the team quite a bit. Kepnang looked good. I like Mulcahy too.BroadcastingDawg said:And then they beat Xavier in Vegas... Sean Miller led team that won 27 games last year and went to the Sweet 16.
I don't get it. -
This is the type of roster Rick Pitino would win 25 games with. 87 Providence, 92 Kentucky and 05 Louisville all had rosters that looked something like this. You’d lose and you ask yourself how Billy Donovan, John Pelphry and Francisco Garcia just kicked your ass. Hopkins will lead these guys to a 16-16 record. It’s really too bad for all these senior transfers.
-
Would have kept Romar
-
Hopkins sucking does not mean that Romar did not also suck.NeGgaPlEaSe said:Would have kept Romar
-
Been pretty much a decade plus of sucking. Dannen needs to hire Romar as recruiting coordinator because Hopkins does a pretty good job of coaching when he’s doing it with Romar players. Better than Romar did at least. Whatever they do, it better not cost much. Football needs more money.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Hopkins sucking does not mean that Romar did not also suck.NeGgaPlEaSe said:Would have kept Romar
-
I miss Romar. Maybe he wasn’t the best coach but he got talent in.
-
This team has talent.PineapplePirate said:I miss Romar. Maybe he wasn’t the best coach but he got talent in.
-
Post 2012 Romar was a shit showNeGgaPlEaSe said:Would have kept Romar
He was a nice guy but it wasn't working. -
There was so much Winning happening last night that Hopkins should have been walked onto the 50 and fired just as a sacrament to the football gods for the next game.
-
UW basketball is AIDS
