Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

UW “survived” while Oregon “drubbed” SC

LawDawg1
LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,942
in Hardcore Husky Board

No matter UW won by more against SC on the road. The “survived” narrative continued this week too


· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • LawDawg1
    LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,942
    What about a neutral field!!!!!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BowDownToInsertPenix
    BowDownToInsertPenix Member Posts: 39
    Which is a better performance:

    1. A back and forth close one possession game into the fourth quarter (gave up 28 in a half)

    Or

    2. Leading by 2+ scores from after the 8 min mark of the 3rd Q, only for the box score to seem closer with 2 meaningless TD’s by USC late.

    (Gave up less all game than UW did in 1 half)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheHB
    TheHB Member Posts: 6,457
    BowDownToInsertPenix said:

    Which is a better performance:

    1. A back and forth close one possession game into the fourth quarter (gave up 28 in a half)

    Or

    2. Leading by 2+ scores from after the 8 min mark of the 3rd Q, only for the box score to seem closer with 2 meaningless TD’s by USC late.

    (Gave up less all game than UW did in 1 half)

    UW can play this game, too.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BowDownToInsertPenix
    BowDownToInsertPenix Member Posts: 39
    edited November 2023
    TheHB said:

    BowDownToInsertPenix said:

    Which is a better performance:

    1. A back and forth close one possession game into the fourth quarter (gave up 28 in a half)

    Or

    2. Leading by 2+ scores from after the 8 min mark of the 3rd Q, only for the box score to seem closer with 2 meaningless TD’s by USC late.

    (Gave up less all game than UW did in 1 half)

    UW can play this game, too.
    Just look at the ESPN win probability throughout both games vs USC and you can understand why one is considered a drubbing and the other is considered surviving.


    Also in this context, it means UW “survived” the gaffe and was able to overcome and win despite the potential momentum swing.

    If anything it is being complimentary.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BowDownToInsertPenix
    BowDownToInsertPenix Member Posts: 39
    FireTheJanitor said:

    BowDownToInsertPenix said:

    TheHB said:

    BowDownToInsertPenix said:

    Which is a better performance:

    1. A back and forth close one possession game into the fourth quarter (gave up 28 in a half)

    Or

    2. Leading by 2+ scores from after the 8 min mark of the 3rd Q, only for the box score to seem closer with 2 meaningless TD’s by USC late.

    (Gave up less all game than UW did in 1 half)

    UW can play this game, too.
    Just look at the ESPN win probability throughout both games vs USC and you can understand why one is considered a drubbing and the other is considered surviving.


    Also in this context, it means UW “survived” the gaffe and was able to overcome and win despite the potential momentum swing.

    If anything it is being complimentary.


    Huh? Every one of these I look at says 100%
    This is what the well educated amongst us would call a “non sequitur”
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BowDownToInsertPenix
    BowDownToInsertPenix Member Posts: 39
    edited November 2023
    UW education showing through here…

    Article is not saying UW was lucky to beat Utah, just that they were able to “survive” the potential upheaval such a gaffe might have cost.

    Unfortunately this isn’t ESPN bending over for Penix and declaring his Jesus so it’s not good enough for the perpetually “disrespected” Doogs
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BowDownToInsertPenix
    BowDownToInsertPenix Member Posts: 39
    edited November 2023
    Doog_de_Jour said:

    BowDownToInsertPenix said:

    UW education showing through here…

    Article is not saying UW was lucky to beat Utah, just that they were able to “survive” the potential upheaval such a gaffe might have cost.

    Unfortunately this isn’t ESPN bending over for Penix and declaring his Jesus so it’s not good enough for the perpetually “disrespected” Doogs
    <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/502026l

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    I too am very upset about this outrageous disparity in AI generated bylines
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BowDownToInsertPenix
    BowDownToInsertPenix Member Posts: 39
    edited November 2023
    Has anyone considered that “Ducks drub” is a pretty cool alliteration that might be good for generating clicks?

    Rooted in substance.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EsophagealFeces
    EsophagealFeces Member Posts: 13,108
    BowDownToInsertPenix said:

    TheHB said:

    BowDownToInsertPenix said:

    Which is a better performance:

    1. A back and forth close one possession game into the fourth quarter (gave up 28 in a half)

    Or

    2. Leading by 2+ scores from after the 8 min mark of the 3rd Q, only for the box score to seem closer with 2 meaningless TD’s by USC late.

    (Gave up less all game than UW did in 1 half)

    UW can play this game, too.
    Just look at the ESPN win probability throughout both games vs USC and you can understand why one is considered a drubbing and the other is considered surviving.


    Also in this context, it means UW “survived” the gaffe and was able to overcome and win despite the potential momentum swing.

    If anything it is being complimentary.
    Win probability is for fags
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Joey
    Joey Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,254 Founders Club
    These gifs are tarnishing DDJ’s sig gif
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,674 Swaye's Wigwam
    UWerentThereMan said:

    Jesus Christ, lock the gates on this homo already

    Just looking over this thread. From a late comer's perspective, what I see is that Damone crossed a line here that even his #1 ass kisser won't quietly drop a chin on. I say well done.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,170
    Hard to read
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Doog_de_Jour
    Doog_de_Jour Member Posts: 8,041 Standard Supporter
    DerekJohnson said:

    TheHB said:

    BowDownToInsertPenix said:

    TheHB said:

    BowDownToInsertPenix said:

    Which is a better performance:

    1. A back and forth close one possession game into the fourth quarter (gave up 28 in a half)

    Or

    2. Leading by 2+ scores from after the 8 min mark of the 3rd Q, only for the box score to seem closer with 2 meaningless TD’s by USC late.

    (Gave up less all game than UW did in 1 half)

    UW can play this game, too.
    Just look at the ESPN win probability throughout both games vs USC and you can understand why one is considered a drubbing and the other is considered surviving.

    It absolutely wasn't Damone. I hate banning guys when we're committed to 99% free speech. But spamming our board with that elicit homosexual material was coming from either someone trying to troll/shit on the board or someone who thinks its funny but doesn't understand our humor and was going over-the-top in trying to fit in. Nevertheless, we have rules about outright porn on the main board. I hope I didn't pull the trigger too quickly in case he was just a doofus in need of guidance. But I tend to think he was simply trying to shit on the board and gum it up.
    I was having a really bad morning and in my foul mood I broke one of my personal rules and fed the troll. For that, I apologize.

    Yeah, I also hope it wasn’t some awkward individual trying to fit in either. Just some people need to read the room.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,146 Founders Club
    DerekJohnson said:

    TheHB said:

    BowDownToInsertPenix said:

    TheHB said:

    BowDownToInsertPenix said:

    Which is a better performance:

    1. A back and forth close one possession game into the fourth quarter (gave up 28 in a half)

    Or

    2. Leading by 2+ scores from after the 8 min mark of the 3rd Q, only for the box score to seem closer with 2 meaningless TD’s by USC late.

    (Gave up less all game than UW did in 1 half)

    UW can play this game, too.
    Just look at the ESPN win probability throughout both games vs USC and you can understand why one is considered a drubbing and the other is considered surviving.

    It absolutely wasn't Damone. I hate banning guys when we're committed to 99% free speech. But spamming our board with that elicit homosexual material was coming from either someone trying to troll/shit on the board or someone who thinks its funny but doesn't understand our humor and was going over-the-top in trying to fit in. Nevertheless, we have rules about outright porn on the main board. I hope I didn't pull the trigger too quickly in case he was just a doofus in need of guidance. But I tend to think he was simply trying to shit on the board and gum it up.
    Good move Stalin.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheHB
    TheHB Member Posts: 6,457
    DerekJohnson said:

    TheHB said:

    BowDownToInsertPenix said:

    TheHB said:

    BowDownToInsertPenix said:

    Which is a better performance:

    1. A back and forth close one possession game into the fourth quarter (gave up 28 in a half)

    Or

    2. Leading by 2+ scores from after the 8 min mark of the 3rd Q, only for the box score to seem closer with 2 meaningless TD’s by USC late.

    (Gave up less all game than UW did in 1 half)

    UW can play this game, too.
    Just look at the ESPN win probability throughout both games vs USC and you can understand why one is considered a drubbing and the other is considered surviving.

    It absolutely wasn't Damone. I hate banning guys when we're committed to 99% free speech. But spamming our board with that elicit homosexual material was coming from either someone trying to troll/shit on the board or someone who thinks its funny but doesn't understand our humor and was going over-the-top in trying to fit in. Nevertheless, we have rules about outright porn on the main board. I hope I didn't pull the trigger too quickly in case he was just a doofus in need of guidance. But I tend to think he was simply trying to shit on the board and gum it up.
    Either way, it’s interesting.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Canadawg
    Canadawg Member Posts: 5,271
    edited November 2023
    What did I miss/ has been deleted

    Edit. Nevermind I got me reads down
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter