I hate watching this team
3 point win over a 3-8 CU
6 point win over a 6-6 ASU
12 point win over a 3-8 Cal
3 point win over a 5-6 Stanford
3 point win over a 5-6 Arizona
7 point win over 6-6 UCLA
Comments
-
Winners … *gulp* … w … wi…
win? -
Disagree. I loved watching Tui’s comeback wins. This team should be much better and showed it for a few flashes and steps on its dick over and over and over. So many times to put games away but go 3 and out or turn it over instead. How many TOs do we have in the red zone now?
And I don’t recall any significant expectations going into 2000 -
Like I said I hate watching this team.LawDawg1 said:Disagree. I loved watching Tui’s comeback wins. This team should be much better and showed it for a few flashes and steps on its dick over and over and over. So many times to put games away but go 3 and out or turn it over instead. How many TOs do we have in the red zone now?
And I don’t recall any significant expectations going into 2000
I also hate having to come from behind against shitty teams. -
Last night felt like a repeat of the Arizona game.
-
I never really felt threatened by Zona though, we had that game under control for the most part. I remember just being more annoyed than anything. Looking back, this win really was a decent one compared to most that we have.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Last night felt like a repeat of the Arizona game.
These last 2 weeks have had me pissed throughout the entirety of both games. -
It’s 4:30am here and I slept 3 hours after a that shitty win. I want and need a blowout win where I can go to sleep feeling good about the game unlike the shit the last 2 weeks.CuntWaffle said:
I never really felt threatened by Zona though, we had that game under control for the most part. I remember just being more annoyed than anything. Looking back, this win really was a decent one compared to most that we have.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Last night felt like a repeat of the Arizona game.
These last 2 weeks have had me pissed throughout the entirety of both games. -
They have no focus, too much pot and thinking of their fat butt girlfriends
-
2000 was ranked top 20 preseason and was favored to win the conference.LawDawg1 said:Disagree. I loved watching Tui’s comeback wins. This team should be much better and showed it for a few flashes and steps on its dick over and over and over. So many times to put games away but go 3 and out or turn it over instead. How many TOs do we have in the red zone now?
And I don’t recall any significant expectations going into 2000
These moral losses are killing me too but we’ve had 2 score leads in all games except ASU. It would be nice if we would do something when we have the chance to put the game away.
-
This team has a largely one dimensional offense, patty cake lines, and a defense that can't tackle for shit. They somewhat remind me of the 1998 fighting Bob Toledo's at UCLA, except DeShaun Foster.
The 2000 Huskies had a lot of nasty in them (thanks Lambo), they could be physically dominant, even beat one of the most talented college football teams of all time. That is NOT this team. This team has a gunslinger and some very talented wide receivers. When there is pass protection, they are a legitimate threat to pull off a string of big plays and in general they don't quit, good traits. But they're not going to intimidate, physically dominate, grind out the clock, or work over any semi worthy opponent. A team like Alabama or Georgia would likely kick their nuts in. Edit: Even Oregon might kick their nuts in if they play again. -
Georgia would obviously kick our nuts in, but Alabama is a retarded inbred version of their former selves.Southerndawg said:This team has a largely one dimensional offense, patty cake lines, and a defense that can't tackle for shit. They somewhat remind me of the 1998 fighting Bob Toledo's at UCLA, except DeShaun Foster.
The 2000 Huskies had a lot of nasty in them (thanks Lambo), they could be physically dominant, even beat one of the most talented college football teams of all time. That is NOT this team. This team has a gunslinger and some very talented wide receivers. When there is pass protection, they are a legitimate threat to pull off a string of big plays and in general they don't quit, good traits. But they're not going to intimidate, physically dominate, grind out the clock, or work over any semi worthy opponent. A team like Alabama or Georgia would likely kick their nuts in. Edit: Even Oregon might kick their nuts in if they play again.
Being Pat Hill TUFF is overrated - see Utah. -
Disagree on Alabama NOT kicking our? nuts in. Not Pat Hill TUFF, they are physical and appear to be gelling, they would give this Husky sqwad fits.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Georgia would obviously kick our nuts in, but Alabama is a retarded inbred version of their former selves.Southerndawg said:This team has a largely one dimensional offense, patty cake lines, and a defense that can't tackle for shit. They somewhat remind me of the 1998 fighting Bob Toledo's at UCLA, except DeShaun Foster.
The 2000 Huskies had a lot of nasty in them (thanks Lambo), they could be physically dominant, even beat one of the most talented college football teams of all time. That is NOT this team. This team has a gunslinger and some very talented wide receivers. When there is pass protection, they are a legitimate threat to pull off a string of big plays and in general they don't quit, good traits. But they're not going to intimidate, physically dominate, grind out the clock, or work over any semi worthy opponent. A team like Alabama or Georgia would likely kick their nuts in. Edit: Even Oregon might kick their nuts in if they play again.
Being Pat Hill TUFF is overrated - see Utah. -
I’m in let it play out mode on which team I hate more. 2000 may have had more nasty on the lines but they had a shit ton of nail biters against shit to mediocre teams. If 2023 can’t win the Pac then we’ll have our answer.Southerndawg said:This team has a largely one dimensional offense, patty cake lines, and a defense that can't tackle for shit. They somewhat remind me of the 1998 fighting Bob Toledo's at UCLA, except DeShaun Foster.
The 2000 Huskies had a lot of nasty in them (thanks Lambo), they could be physically dominant, even beat one of the most talented college football teams of all time. That is NOT this team. This team has a gunslinger and some very talented wide receivers. When there is pass protection, they are a legitimate threat to pull off a string of big plays and in general they don't quit, good traits. But they're not going to intimidate, physically dominate, grind out the clock, or work over any semi worthy opponent. A team like Alabama or Georgia would likely kick their nuts in. Edit: Even Oregon might kick their nuts in if they play again. -
Alabama would out-athlete UW, rather easily.Southerndawg said:
Disagree on Alabama NOT kicking our? nuts in. Not Pat Hill TUFF, they are physical and appear to be gelling, they would give this Husky sqwad fits.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Georgia would obviously kick our nuts in, but Alabama is a retarded inbred version of their former selves.Southerndawg said:This team has a largely one dimensional offense, patty cake lines, and a defense that can't tackle for shit. They somewhat remind me of the 1998 fighting Bob Toledo's at UCLA, except DeShaun Foster.
The 2000 Huskies had a lot of nasty in them (thanks Lambo), they could be physically dominant, even beat one of the most talented college football teams of all time. That is NOT this team. This team has a gunslinger and some very talented wide receivers. When there is pass protection, they are a legitimate threat to pull off a string of big plays and in general they don't quit, good traits. But they're not going to intimidate, physically dominate, grind out the clock, or work over any semi worthy opponent. A team like Alabama or Georgia would likely kick their nuts in. Edit: Even Oregon might kick their nuts in if they play again.
Being Pat Hill TUFF is overrated - see Utah. -
I think any truly physical team is going to kick our nuts in. Do not think that they will at this point, but I think UW gets embarrassed if they made the playoffs.Southerndawg said:
Disagree on Alabama NOT kicking our? nuts in. Not Pat Hill TUFF, they are physical and appear to be gelling, they would give this Husky sqwad fits.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Georgia would obviously kick our nuts in, but Alabama is a retarded inbred version of their former selves.Southerndawg said:This team has a largely one dimensional offense, patty cake lines, and a defense that can't tackle for shit. They somewhat remind me of the 1998 fighting Bob Toledo's at UCLA, except DeShaun Foster.
The 2000 Huskies had a lot of nasty in them (thanks Lambo), they could be physically dominant, even beat one of the most talented college football teams of all time. That is NOT this team. This team has a gunslinger and some very talented wide receivers. When there is pass protection, they are a legitimate threat to pull off a string of big plays and in general they don't quit, good traits. But they're not going to intimidate, physically dominate, grind out the clock, or work over any semi worthy opponent. A team like Alabama or Georgia would likely kick their nuts in. Edit: Even Oregon might kick their nuts in if they play again.
Being Pat Hill TUFF is overrated - see Utah.
We couldn't handle ASU's DLine for fucks sake. -
Agree. But messiah QBs can make things interesting.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Alabama would out-athlete UW, rather easily.Southerndawg said:
Disagree on Alabama NOT kicking our? nuts in. Not Pat Hill TUFF, they are physical and appear to be gelling, they would give this Husky sqwad fits.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Georgia would obviously kick our nuts in, but Alabama is a retarded inbred version of their former selves.Southerndawg said:This team has a largely one dimensional offense, patty cake lines, and a defense that can't tackle for shit. They somewhat remind me of the 1998 fighting Bob Toledo's at UCLA, except DeShaun Foster.
The 2000 Huskies had a lot of nasty in them (thanks Lambo), they could be physically dominant, even beat one of the most talented college football teams of all time. That is NOT this team. This team has a gunslinger and some very talented wide receivers. When there is pass protection, they are a legitimate threat to pull off a string of big plays and in general they don't quit, good traits. But they're not going to intimidate, physically dominate, grind out the clock, or work over any semi worthy opponent. A team like Alabama or Georgia would likely kick their nuts in. Edit: Even Oregon might kick their nuts in if they play again.
Being Pat Hill TUFF is overrated - see Utah. -
Well I love this team, it’s been amazing to watch… but if we are honest, they started the year with a team that we all thought was going to have an improved defense but was clearly going to have to outscore every team we faced, have a gunslinger QB that until the 2nd half of the Oregon game was throwing perfect dimes 80 percent of the time, had 2 pro receivers that in fact turned into 3 with yet another younger player that stepped up Bigly, and a below average running game that required the long ball to establish and maintain vs any opponent not named Portland State.
What has happened since is a slew of injuries to key players with no real depth behind them, including our QB who has continued to play anyway. Everyone on the team, the coaching staff, the teams we are facing and our fans can see the impossible issues with this team and yet they have continued to find a way to believe they can and will win. Its been impressive to watch PAC 12 teams with no pulse come alive with the hope of knocking off the top ranked dawgs and then continue to terrorize the rest of the teams they face in the aftermath of playing the Dawgs.
In the great tradition, as Sammi Sosa said ‘keep it to continue’. Tightrope watching has always been a bitch to watch. -
Maybe this team is ‘97 incarnate. Tons of talent, banged up physically. They’ll finally be healthy for the bowl game and destroy a middling opponent.
-
@DerekJohnson Can we get a fat butt girlfriends board?PurpleReign said:They have no focus, too much pot and thinking of their fat butt girlfriends
-
What's funny is that every team that plays UW "gets right" afterward.
Since playing UW, Arizona has taken USC to double-OT, destroyed ranked Coug, and beaten top-10 Beavis.
Since playing UW, Oregon has outscored two ranked opponents 73-30, including giving the raw plunger to #13 Utah.
Since playing UW, ASU got their first FBS win against the Coug. Rather easily.
Poor WSU keeps being the victim of the UW bump. Watch Stanford run train on them next Saturday.
We(?)'re like that not-very-physical team on everyone's schedule that they think of as a bye, only that weirdly beats them anyway. -
Fat bottomed girls you make 2023 Washington go down.Quietcowskee said:
@DerekJohnson Can we get a fat butt girlfriends board?PurpleReign said:They have no focus, too much pot and thinking of their fat butt girlfriends
-
Watch what we can make backup Qbs look like!1to392831weretaken said:What's funny is that every team that plays UW "gets right" afterward.
Since playing UW, Arizona has taken USC to double-OT, destroyed ranked Coug, and beaten top-10 Beavis.
Since playing UW, Oregon has outscored two ranked opponents 73-30, including giving the raw plunger to #13 Utah.
Since playing UW, ASU got their first FBS win against the Coug. Rather easily.
Poor WSU keeps being the victim of the UW bump. Watch Stanford run train on them next Saturday.
We(?)'re like that not-very-physical team on everyone's schedule that they think of as a bye, only that weirdly beats them anyway. -
POTDTheRoarOfTheCrowd said:Well I love this team, it’s been amazing to watch… but if we are honest, they started the year with a team that we all thought was going to have an improved defense but was clearly going to have to outscore every team we faced, have a gunslinger QB that until the 2nd half of the Oregon game was throwing perfect dimes 80 percent of the time, had 2 pro receivers that in fact turned into 3 with yet another younger player that stepped up Bigly, and a below average running game that required the long ball to establish and maintain vs any opponent not named Portland State.
What has happened since is a slew of injuries to key players with no real depth behind them, including our QB who has continued to play anyway. Everyone on the team, the coaching staff, the teams we are facing and our fans can see the impossible issues with this team and yet they have continued to find a way to believe they can and will win. Its been impressive to watch PAC 12 teams with no pulse come alive with the hope of knocking off the top ranked dawgs and then continue to terrorize the rest of the teams they face in the aftermath of playing the Dawgs.
In the great tradition, as Sammi Sosa said ‘keep it to continue’. Tightrope watching has always been a bitch to watch. -
You like giving theoretical wins to physical teams after we've already beat them on the field. IWYLTDSoutherndawg said:This team has a largely one dimensional offense, patty cake lines, and a defense that can't tackle for shit. They somewhat remind me of the 1998 fighting Bob Toledo's at UCLA, except DeShaun Foster.
The 2000 Huskies had a lot of nasty in them (thanks Lambo), they could be physically dominant, even beat one of the most talented college football teams of all time. That is NOT this team. This team has a gunslinger and some very talented wide receivers. When there is pass protection, they are a legitimate threat to pull off a string of big plays and in general they don't quit, good traits. But they're not going to intimidate, physically dominate, grind out the clock, or work over any semi worthy opponent. A team like Alabama or Georgia would likely kick their nuts in. Edit: Even Oregon might kick their nuts in if they play again. -
2000 had Larry Triplett, Anthony Vontoure and Jeremiah Pharms. Having a disruptive D tackle changes everything. Akbar was an underrated S.
And while of course Tui wasn’t 1/3 of the passer Penix is, he could hurt you with his feet and was a great dual htreat harder to defend.
Yes they had close calls to garbage teams but they beat very good Miami and Oregon State teams. There’s no team on the schedule as good as either of those teams were then. The O line didn’t produce any NFL players but they were huge and good at run blocking.
2000 deserves some respeck. The season isn’t over for 2023 DWAG so crown they ass if you dare. I’m in LIPO. Should win out. Thinking BeavE might fuck up Whoregon or DWAG season. LISLIPO
@BennyBeaver -
I wish Penix had legs. He doesn’t said. I still take his NFL arm over Tui.creepycoug said:2000 had Larry Triplett, Anthony Vontoure and Jeremiah Pharms. Having a disruptive D tackle changes everything. Akbar was an underrated S.
And while of course Tui wasn’t 1/3 of the passer Penix is, he could hurt you with his feet and was a great dual htreat harder to defend.
Yes they had close calls to garbage teams but they beat very good Miami and Oregon State teams. There’s no team on the schedule as good as either of those teams were then. The O line didn’t produce any NFL players but they were huge and good at run blocking.
2000 deserves some respeck. The season isn’t over for 2023 DWAG so crown they ass if you dare. I’m in LIPO. Should win out. Thinking BeavE might fuck up Whoregon or DWAG season. LISLIPO
@BennyBeaver
2000 had some great dudes. Just pointing out here how much I hated watching them play down to their opponents.
Also your Miamuh bias will always skew your 2000 perspective @creepycoug -
Count the honors on that roster Yella: NFL D POTY, HOFamer (and still counting with at least 2 more to come), more Pro Bowls and All Pro selections than you can count and an NFL ROTY.YellowSnow said:
I wish Penix had legs. He doesn’t said. I still take his NFL arm over Tui.creepycoug said:2000 had Larry Triplett, Anthony Vontoure and Jeremiah Pharms. Having a disruptive D tackle changes everything. Akbar was an underrated S.
And while of course Tui wasn’t 1/3 of the passer Penix is, he could hurt you with his feet and was a great dual htreat harder to defend.
Yes they had close calls to garbage teams but they beat very good Miami and Oregon State teams. There’s no team on the schedule as good as either of those teams were then. The O line didn’t produce any NFL players but they were huge and good at run blocking.
2000 deserves some respeck. The season isn’t over for 2023 DWAG so crown they ass if you dare. I’m in LIPO. Should win out. Thinking BeavE might fuck up Whoregon or DWAG season. LISLIPO
@BennyBeaver
2000 had some great dudes. Just pointing out here how much I hated watching them play down to their opponents.
Also your Miamuh bias will always skew your 2000 perspective @creepycoug
Team was loaded af brosef. That’s not bias. That’s some facts. Boom!
2000 DWAGs were much tuffer than this Husky sqaud. Receivers and passing is the one clear area that this team does way better. Can’t think of anything else. -
They were loaded AF but got upset a few times by vastly inferior teams.creepycoug said:
Count the honors on that roster Yella: NFL D POTY, HOFamer (and still counting with at least 2 more to come), more Pro Bowls than you can count and an NFL ROTY.YellowSnow said:
I wish Penix had legs. He doesn’t said. I still take his NFL arm over Tui.creepycoug said:2000 had Larry Triplett, Anthony Vontoure and Jeremiah Pharms. Having a disruptive D tackle changes everything. Akbar was an underrated S.
And while of course Tui wasn’t 1/3 of the passer Penix is, he could hurt you with his feet and was a great dual htreat harder to defend.
Yes they had close calls to garbage teams but they beat very good Miami and Oregon State teams. There’s no team on the schedule as good as either of those teams were then. The O line didn’t produce any NFL players but they were huge and good at run blocking.
2000 deserves some respeck. The season isn’t over for 2023 DWAG so crown they ass if you dare. I’m in LIPO. Should win out. Thinking BeavE might fuck up Whoregon or DWAG season. LISLIPO
@BennyBeaver
2000 had some great dudes. Just pointing out here how much I hated watching them play down to their opponents.
Also your Miamuh bias will always skew your 2000 perspective @creepycoug
Team that as loaded brosef. That’s not bias. That’s some facts. Boom!
Plus UW always get greased up for Miamuh except for Bin Laden. -
Got upset by ONE: the one we’re talking about. Also beat the best Beaver team ever. I was there!!!YellowSnow said:
They were loaded AF but got upset a few times by vastly inferior teams.creepycoug said:
Count the honors on that roster Yella: NFL D POTY, HOFamer (and still counting with at least 2 more to come), more Pro Bowls than you can count and an NFL ROTY.YellowSnow said:
I wish Penix had legs. He doesn’t said. I still take his NFL arm over Tui.creepycoug said:2000 had Larry Triplett, Anthony Vontoure and Jeremiah Pharms. Having a disruptive D tackle changes everything. Akbar was an underrated S.
And while of course Tui wasn’t 1/3 of the passer Penix is, he could hurt you with his feet and was a great dual htreat harder to defend.
Yes they had close calls to garbage teams but they beat very good Miami and Oregon State teams. There’s no team on the schedule as good as either of those teams were then. The O line didn’t produce any NFL players but they were huge and good at run blocking.
2000 deserves some respeck. The season isn’t over for 2023 DWAG so crown they ass if you dare. I’m in LIPO. Should win out. Thinking BeavE might fuck up Whoregon or DWAG season. LISLIPO
@BennyBeaver
2000 had some great dudes. Just pointing out here how much I hated watching them play down to their opponents.
Also your Miamuh bias will always skew your 2000 perspective @creepycoug
Team that as loaded brosef. That’s not bias. That’s some facts. Boom!
Plus UW always get greased up for Miamuh except for Bin Laden. -
In all seriousness, the 2000 team would do a couple of tings that would have caused Penix trouble:
1. Vontoure would have corner blitzed him and hurt him. He’s fragile, as Oregon kinda showed. AV also takes a receiver out of the game. Dood was good. People forget.
2. Tui would would have moved the ball on this defense in the running game and eaten clock, making the Penix a little flacid.
3. Triplett and Pharms would have yielded zero fucking running yards and Trip would have collapsed the pocket - and the Penix would have been uncomfortable.
I honestly believe 2000 DWAG could have given 2023 DWAG a serious run for their money. -
I’m talking about Miami getting upset in 2000 and 2002 @creepycoug . Best team in each year and only 1 Natty.creepycoug said:
Got upset by ONE: the one we’re talking about. Also beat the best Beaver team ever. I was there!!!YellowSnow said:
They were loaded AF but got upset a few times by vastly inferior teams.creepycoug said:
Count the honors on that roster Yella: NFL D POTY, HOFamer (and still counting with at least 2 more to come), more Pro Bowls than you can count and an NFL ROTY.YellowSnow said:
I wish Penix had legs. He doesn’t said. I still take his NFL arm over Tui.creepycoug said:2000 had Larry Triplett, Anthony Vontoure and Jeremiah Pharms. Having a disruptive D tackle changes everything. Akbar was an underrated S.
And while of course Tui wasn’t 1/3 of the passer Penix is, he could hurt you with his feet and was a great dual htreat harder to defend.
Yes they had close calls to garbage teams but they beat very good Miami and Oregon State teams. There’s no team on the schedule as good as either of those teams were then. The O line didn’t produce any NFL players but they were huge and good at run blocking.
2000 deserves some respeck. The season isn’t over for 2023 DWAG so crown they ass if you dare. I’m in LIPO. Should win out. Thinking BeavE might fuck up Whoregon or DWAG season. LISLIPO
@BennyBeaver
2000 had some great dudes. Just pointing out here how much I hated watching them play down to their opponents.
Also your Miamuh bias will always skew your 2000 perspective @creepycoug
Team that as loaded brosef. That’s not bias. That’s some facts. Boom!
Plus UW always get greased up for Miamuh except for Bin Laden.
