Hardcore Husky Podcast: This Saturday's Sizzling Point-a-Minute Showdown: UW vs. Oregon!
https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/hardcorehusky/episodes/This-Saturdays-Sizzling-Point-a-Minute-Showdown-UW-vs-Oregon-e2acj6c
Comments
-
Great choice with the pup rant.
-
I took no issue until someone said Oregon brings back the same team. Oregon has better playmakers at WR and the defense is overhauled. The inside linebackers are much better equipped to handle coverage responsibilities. The defensive line and pressure rate is worlds better and tackling is much improved - Oregon got the 2nd year bump (much like Oklahoma) from a defensive-minded coach. The comment shows a lack of research for sure.
Comparing the schedules to date is like measuring the tallest midget. Tech is ranked higher than Arizona on FEI, SP+, FPI, etc. and they're not really close (30ish spots). The spread between Tech and Zona would be 7 points based on advanced metrics. The Arizona/USC game is more of an indication of USC than Arizona. The reality is either team should be 5-0 to date.
Lastly, I think the difference in pressure rate by Oregon and the disparity of pressure Oregon can cause vs the schedule UW has faced is a major talking point. I think Oregon can and, probably will, pressure at much better rate than last year.
-
Listen at work tomorrow like usual but thanks for sticking with the pod pods. Consistency is key.
What cartoonish noises did @WoolleyDoog make in the background for this one? -
Go beat off to a picture of Lanning, faggot. Metrics are for loosers.bisonduck said:I took no issue until someone said Oregon brings back the same team. Oregon has better playmakers at WR and the defense is overhauled. The inside linebackers are much better equipped to handle coverage responsibilities. The defensive line and pressure rate is worlds better and tackling is much improved - Oregon got the 2nd year bump (much like Oklahoma) from a defensive-minded coach. The comment shows a lack of research for sure.
Comparing the schedules to date is like measuring the tallest midget. Tech is ranked higher than Arizona on FEI, SP+, FPI, etc. and they're not really close (30ish spots). The spread between Tech and Zona would be 7 points based on advanced metrics. The Arizona/USC game is more of an indication of USC than Arizona. The reality is either team should be 5-0 to date.
Lastly, I think the difference in pressure rate by Oregon and the disparity of pressure Oregon can cause vs the schedule UW has faced is a major talking point. I think Oregon can and, probably will, pressure at much better rate than last year. -
I think a UDUB fan that never watched a game of theirs in their life is better than the metrics.EsophagealFeces said:
Go beat off to a picture of Lanning, faggot. Metrics are for loosers.bisonduck said:I took no issue until someone said Oregon brings back the same team. Oregon has better playmakers at WR and the defense is overhauled. The inside linebackers are much better equipped to handle coverage responsibilities. The defensive line and pressure rate is worlds better and tackling is much improved - Oregon got the 2nd year bump (much like Oklahoma) from a defensive-minded coach. The comment shows a lack of research for sure.
Comparing the schedules to date is like measuring the tallest midget. Tech is ranked higher than Arizona on FEI, SP+, FPI, etc. and they're not really close (30ish spots). The spread between Tech and Zona would be 7 points based on advanced metrics. The Arizona/USC game is more of an indication of USC than Arizona. The reality is either team should be 5-0 to date.
Lastly, I think the difference in pressure rate by Oregon and the disparity of pressure Oregon can cause vs the schedule UW has faced is a major talking point. I think Oregon can and, probably will, pressure at much better rate than last year. -
The Oregon fanbase is hilarious. No ever goes to Oregon because it's a shitty college but they defend it like they went there.bisonduck said:
I think a UDUB fan that never watched a game of theirs in their life is better than the metrics.EsophagealFeces said:
Go beat off to a picture of Lanning, faggot. Metrics are for loosers.bisonduck said:I took no issue until someone said Oregon brings back the same team. Oregon has better playmakers at WR and the defense is overhauled. The inside linebackers are much better equipped to handle coverage responsibilities. The defensive line and pressure rate is worlds better and tackling is much improved - Oregon got the 2nd year bump (much like Oklahoma) from a defensive-minded coach. The comment shows a lack of research for sure.
Comparing the schedules to date is like measuring the tallest midget. Tech is ranked higher than Arizona on FEI, SP+, FPI, etc. and they're not really close (30ish spots). The spread between Tech and Zona would be 7 points based on advanced metrics. The Arizona/USC game is more of an indication of USC than Arizona. The reality is either team should be 5-0 to date.
Lastly, I think the difference in pressure rate by Oregon and the disparity of pressure Oregon can cause vs the schedule UW has faced is a major talking point. I think Oregon can and, probably will, pressure at much better rate than last year. -
Better playmakers on at WR… you couldn’t even make it two sentences without lying you lying fuck.bisonduck said:I took no issue until someone said Oregon brings back the same team. Oregon has better playmakers at WR and the defense is overhauled. The inside linebackers are much better equipped to handle coverage responsibilities. The defensive line and pressure rate is worlds better and tackling is much improved - Oregon got the 2nd year bump (much like Oklahoma) from a defensive-minded coach. The comment shows a lack of research for sure.
Comparing the schedules to date is like measuring the tallest midget. Tech is ranked higher than Arizona on FEI, SP+, FPI, etc. and they're not really close (30ish spots). The spread between Tech and Zona would be 7 points based on advanced metrics. The Arizona/USC game is more of an indication of USC than Arizona. The reality is either team should be 5-0 to date.
Lastly, I think the difference in pressure rate by Oregon and the disparity of pressure Oregon can cause vs the schedule UW has faced is a major talking point. I think Oregon can and, probably will, pressure at much better rate than last year. -
@DerekJohnson what was the bit coin conference about?
-
You can't play that game both ways Derek.
Washington could kneel it and be up by 17 with 10 minutes to go.. -
Arizona game was never in doubt and we act like it was
-
I feel like it was… shouldershrug.gifJoeEDangerously said:Arizona game was never in doubt and we act like it was
-
dirtysouwfdawg said:
I feel like it was… shouldershrug.gifJoeEDangerously said:Arizona game was never in doubt and we act like it was
-
Crispenedbisonduck said:
Oregon is rooted in substance, didn’t you see the new ad campaign?EsophagealFeces said:
Go beat off to a picture of Lanning, faggot. Metrics are for loosers.bisonduck said:I took no issue until someone said Oregon brings back the same team. Oregon has better playmakers at WR and the defense is overhauled. The inside linebackers are much better equipped to handle coverage responsibilities. The defensive line and pressure rate is worlds better and tackling is much improved - Oregon got the 2nd year bump (much like Oklahoma) from a defensive-minded coach. The comment shows a lack of research for sure.
Comparing the schedules to date is like measuring the tallest midget. Tech is ranked higher than Arizona on FEI, SP+, FPI, etc. and they're not really close (30ish spots). The spread between Tech and Zona would be 7 points based on advanced metrics. The Arizona/USC game is more of an indication of USC than Arizona. The reality is either team should be 5-0 to date.
Lastly, I think the difference in pressure rate by Oregon and the disparity of pressure Oregon can cause vs the schedule UW has faced is a major talking point. I think Oregon can and, probably will, pressure at much better rate than last year. -
Thanks for the pod, pods
-
If you're referring to my partial defense of Grubb on throwing into the flat to Westover and having it result in 3 incomplete passes in a row and failing to run clock, then you're probably right. It was kind of indefensible to not run 1-2 times in that sequence. Especially since our running game is more effective this year as compared to last year.haie said:You can't play that game both ways Derek.
Washington could kneel it and be up by 17 with 10 minutes to go.. -
It was 95% a sure thing but not 100 IMOJoeEDangerously said:Arizona game was never in doubt and we act like it was
-
DerekJohnson said:
It was 95% a sure thing but not 100 IMOJoeEDangerously said:Arizona game was never in doubt and we act like it was
-
JoeEDangerously said:DerekJohnson said:
It was 95% a sure thing but not 100 IMOJoeEDangerously said:Arizona game was never in doubt and we act like it was
-
I'll probably do a little write-up about it later todayhaie said:@DerekJohnson what was the bit coin conference about?
-
Great sales pitch for the Wam.
-
Stalins commie lawyers have given me a gag orderSpoonieLuv said:Great sales pitch for the Wam.
-
I created a monster with my pal, chief, boss poll
-
It’s gonna be OK, friend.YellowSnow said:I created a monster with my pal, chief, boss poll
-
I am comparing Oregon to itself last year.dirtysouwfdawg said:
Better playmakers on at WR… you couldn’t even make it two sentences without lying you lying fuck.bisonduck said:I took no issue until someone said Oregon brings back the same team. Oregon has better playmakers at WR and the defense is overhauled. The inside linebackers are much better equipped to handle coverage responsibilities. The defensive line and pressure rate is worlds better and tackling is much improved - Oregon got the 2nd year bump (much like Oklahoma) from a defensive-minded coach. The comment shows a lack of research for sure.
Comparing the schedules to date is like measuring the tallest midget. Tech is ranked higher than Arizona on FEI, SP+, FPI, etc. and they're not really close (30ish spots). The spread between Tech and Zona would be 7 points based on advanced metrics. The Arizona/USC game is more of an indication of USC than Arizona. The reality is either team should be 5-0 to date.
Lastly, I think the difference in pressure rate by Oregon and the disparity of pressure Oregon can cause vs the schedule UW has faced is a major talking point. I think Oregon can and, probably will, pressure at much better rate than last year. -
But still.bisonduck said:
I am comparing Oregon to itself last year.dirtysouwfdawg said:
Better playmakers on at WR… you couldn’t even make it two sentences without lying you lying fuck.bisonduck said:I took no issue until someone said Oregon brings back the same team. Oregon has better playmakers at WR and the defense is overhauled. The inside linebackers are much better equipped to handle coverage responsibilities. The defensive line and pressure rate is worlds better and tackling is much improved - Oregon got the 2nd year bump (much like Oklahoma) from a defensive-minded coach. The comment shows a lack of research for sure.
Comparing the schedules to date is like measuring the tallest midget. Tech is ranked higher than Arizona on FEI, SP+, FPI, etc. and they're not really close (30ish spots). The spread between Tech and Zona would be 7 points based on advanced metrics. The Arizona/USC game is more of an indication of USC than Arizona. The reality is either team should be 5-0 to date.
Lastly, I think the difference in pressure rate by Oregon and the disparity of pressure Oregon can cause vs the schedule UW has faced is a major talking point. I think Oregon can and, probably will, pressure at much better rate than last year. -
It's not the same team. Tez Johnson is a significant update at the slot, Franklin is a better version of himself, Bryant is more reliable than Thornton (drops)/Cota (always injured), and the depth is better.dirtysouwfdawg said:
But still.bisonduck said:
I am comparing Oregon to itself last year.dirtysouwfdawg said:
Better playmakers on at WR… you couldn’t even make it two sentences without lying you lying fuck.bisonduck said:I took no issue until someone said Oregon brings back the same team. Oregon has better playmakers at WR and the defense is overhauled. The inside linebackers are much better equipped to handle coverage responsibilities. The defensive line and pressure rate is worlds better and tackling is much improved - Oregon got the 2nd year bump (much like Oklahoma) from a defensive-minded coach. The comment shows a lack of research for sure.
Comparing the schedules to date is like measuring the tallest midget. Tech is ranked higher than Arizona on FEI, SP+, FPI, etc. and they're not really close (30ish spots). The spread between Tech and Zona would be 7 points based on advanced metrics. The Arizona/USC game is more of an indication of USC than Arizona. The reality is either team should be 5-0 to date.
Lastly, I think the difference in pressure rate by Oregon and the disparity of pressure Oregon can cause vs the schedule UW has faced is a major talking point. I think Oregon can and, probably will, pressure at much better rate than last year.
-
bisonduck said:
It's not the same team. Tez Johnson is a significant update at the slot, Franklin is a better version of himself, Bryant is more reliable than Thornton (drops)/Cota (always injured), and the depth is better.dirtysouwfdawg said:
But still.bisonduck said:
I am comparing Oregon to itself last year.dirtysouwfdawg said:
Better playmakers on at WR… you couldn’t even make it two sentences without lying you lying fuck.bisonduck said:I took no issue until someone said Oregon brings back the same team. Oregon has better playmakers at WR and the defense is overhauled. The inside linebackers are much better equipped to handle coverage responsibilities. The defensive line and pressure rate is worlds better and tackling is much improved - Oregon got the 2nd year bump (much like Oklahoma) from a defensive-minded coach. The comment shows a lack of research for sure.
Comparing the schedules to date is like measuring the tallest midget. Tech is ranked higher than Arizona on FEI, SP+, FPI, etc. and they're not really close (30ish spots). The spread between Tech and Zona would be 7 points based on advanced metrics. The Arizona/USC game is more of an indication of USC than Arizona. The reality is either team should be 5-0 to date.
Lastly, I think the difference in pressure rate by Oregon and the disparity of pressure Oregon can cause vs the schedule UW has faced is a major talking point. I think Oregon can and, probably will, pressure at much better rate than last year.
-
You got that right, budYellowSnow said:I created a monster with my pal, chief, boss poll
-
Along with your children, this is your legacy to the world.YellowSnow said:I created a monster with my pal, chief, boss poll
-
Finally listening to the 2nd half of the pod.
Regarding the @huskyhooligan acronym IWLTSASOTPBAHMD,
I would like to send a shout out to Purple Baze and his massive dong.
What else would he post about?
It's hard.
