Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Shouldn't Oregon be the heavy favorite?

«134

Comments

  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    Sounds like the people aren't confident in the talent on this sidelines .
  • ntxduck
    ntxduck Member Posts: 6,259
    edited August 2023
    dnc said:

    Sounds like the people aren't confident in the talent on this sidelines .

    Oregon’s 2nd favorite on every other book. Classic wolfy pulling the most obscure odds possible from some Panamanian book.

    Also looks like he swapped Oregon and Oregon state/Utah in his table. Great work, scott
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    ntxduck said:

    dnc said:

    Sounds like the people aren't confident in the talent on this sidelines .

    Oregon’s 2nd favorite on every other book. Classic wolfy pulling the most obscure odds possible from some Panamanian book.

    Also looks like he swapped Oregon and Oregon state/Utah in his table. Great work, scott
    To be clear, you think Oregon's odds should be 8/1 rather than 15/4?
  • ntxduck
    ntxduck Member Posts: 6,259
    dnc said:

    ntxduck said:

    dnc said:

    Sounds like the people aren't confident in the talent on this sidelines .

    Oregon’s 2nd favorite on every other book. Classic wolfy pulling the most obscure odds possible from some Panamanian book.

    Also looks like he swapped Oregon and Oregon state/Utah in his table. Great work, scott
    To be clear, you think Oregon's odds should be 8/1 rather than 15/4?
    No—the far right column is implied % of winning the conference based on the betting odds. It’s not % of $ received, as CU is he biggest liability at every single book.

    Oregon should be 15.2%. Utah 9.1%. Oregon state 7.6%.

    On every US book, Oregon is ahead of UW. No idea why he pulled the odds from this obscure Caribbean outfit instead of using dk/fd.

    If you’re not familiar with wolf, he makes eklund look like Einstein.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Like I’ve said many times Peterman was a damn good recruiter. 90-11, not so much. Enjoy the best talent he’ll ever have to work with this coming year, Race.

    MidB1G is your future.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,872 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    Like I’ve said many times Peterman was a damn good recruiter. 90-11, not so much. Enjoy the best talent he’ll ever have to work with this coming year, Race.

    MidB1G is your future.

    Enjoy wasting talent

    Again
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    10-3, such a waste.

    Enjoy your best season ever under 90-11.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,872 Founders Club
    So Kirby was wrong then. Coaching matters

    11-2 >> 10-3

    37-34

    Loser
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    edited August 2023

    So Kirby was wrong then. Coaching matters

    11-2 >> 10-3

    37-34

    Loser

    When did you get dropped on your head old man?

    Or did you just stumble and bump it?

    uw wasn't void of talent last year.

    Thanks Peterman!

    You missed Smart's point.

    Shocking.

    Dipshit.