Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
What grouping would you prefer, if say the conference wanted to add 3 teams?
Comments
-
CSU, Wyoming, Utah StateI voted for the worst option which forces us? to LEAVE!
-
SDSU, Fresno, Boise StWhy does every one hate the fighting Mormons?
BYwho?
-
SDSU, Fresno, Boise Stfuck the PAC and blue turf
-
Yellow Snow is a peter puffer rower and is the reason you forgot:
What's the safe word again?TheHB said:Gun, rope, fire.
In that order. -
Is GTFO an option?
-
Evergreen State College, Western Washington and Olympic College for me and @BleachedAnusDawg
-
I’m glad I’m not the only one that initially read that… you’re still fucked up.Quietcowskee said:I thought you asked what groping I’d prefer?🤷♂️
-
Trump University, ITT Technical Institute, McDonald's Hamburger University
-
I say we go full retard and invite UBC and UNAM. UNAM and UBC don’t really have football programs but fit every other category for the PAC.
UNAM can build their programs up, we get an annual fall trip to Mexico City. And the entire Mexican population has a team to root for. Mexico City itself is like 30 million people.
As for UBC, it’s as well regarded academically as UW and for college football you could claim half of Canada would have a single choice to support. Way more markets opened up.
-
This is some creative thinking... but what about China?StLouisDawg said:I say we go full retard and invite UBC and UNAM. UNAM and UBC don’t really have football programs but fit every other category for the PAC.
UNAM can build their programs up, we get an annual fall trip to Mexico City. And the entire Mexican population has a team to root for. Mexico City itself is like 30 million people.
As for UBC, it’s as well regarded academically as UW and for college football you could claim half of Canada would have a single choice to support. Way more markets opened up.
