Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Oregon scared of a little competition

BleachedAnusDawg
BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,569 Standard Supporter
edited July 2023 in Hardcore Husky Board
https://www.si.com/college/stanford/football/two-pac-12-programs-currently-not-on-board-with-conference-expansion

Both programs resided in prominent markets, and both are viewed as having potential to eventually compete in the Pac-12. Them joining the Pac-12 is something that has been seen as inevitable, but according to a report by The Athletic, not every team in the conference is on board with adding any more members.

Stewart Mandel explained that the belief is the programs do not want any more competition within the conference, so when the expanded playoff comes around and automatic bids are given to the conference champ there's less teams to compete with. He also revealed that one of the teams that is believed to be against expansion is Oregon.

Comments

  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,268 Founders Club
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.

    Why should Washington share revenue with Oregon and Utah?
    Why should Oregon share revenue with washington and Utah?
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,994
    46XiJCAB said:

    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.

    SDSU made more money from the NCAA tournament this year than the entire Pac-12
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,268 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.

    Why should Washington share revenue with Oregon and Utah?
    Why should Oregon share revenue with washington and Utah?
    What revenue do they have to share? Eugene Sven bucks?
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    46XiJCAB said:

    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.

    SDSU made more money from the NCAA tournament this year than the entire Pac-12
    Football is the only thing that matters. They play in a 35K stadium. Martin stadium south. Now if we’re talking a straight up trade then yes.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,609 Founders Club
    edited July 2023
    46XiJCAB said:

    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.

    This will be bad for my brand but I stand with @46XiJCAB . Adding the scrubs does nothing to help Oregon or Washington.

    And if we’re calling balls and strikes, the Ducks did bring in more AD revenue in 2022 than us @haie
    https://247sports.com/college/oregon/article/oregon-ducks-football-revenue-sharing-expenses-pac-12-conference--211577015/amp/

    Alas, these faggy White Wakanda IPAs are killing my brain cells and making the Stockholm syndrome worse.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,268 Founders Club

    46XiJCAB said:

    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.

    This will be bad for my brand but I stand with @46XiJCAB . Adding the scrubs does nothing to help Oregon or Washington.

    And if we’re calling balls and strikes, the Ducks did bring in more AD revenue in 2022 than us @haie
    https://247sports.com/college/oregon/article/oregon-ducks-football-revenue-sharing-expenses-pac-12-conference--211577015/amp/

    Alas, these faggy White Wakanda IPAs are killing my brain cells and making the Stockholm syndrome worse.
    Oregon hosted everyone this year. Including Washington and Utah.

    Next year, their schedule sucks outside of USC.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,609 Founders Club
    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.

    This will be bad for my brand but I stand with @46XiJCAB . Adding the scrubs does nothing to help Oregon or Washington.

    And if we’re calling balls and strikes, the Ducks did bring in more AD revenue in 2022 than us @haie
    https://247sports.com/college/oregon/article/oregon-ducks-football-revenue-sharing-expenses-pac-12-conference--211577015/amp/

    Alas, these faggy White Wakanda IPAs are killing my brain cells and making the Stockholm syndrome worse.
    Oregon hosted everyone this year. Including Washington and Utah.

    Next year, their schedule sucks outside of USC.
    Like I said. I’m drinking.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,268 Founders Club

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    I love Oregon putting it out there that the Pac-10 will only attract scrub schools, why share revenue with a SDSU, BSU, FSU or SMU. Sounds like there are a few smart AD's in the Pac-10 besides Mullens.

    This will be bad for my brand but I stand with @46XiJCAB . Adding the scrubs does nothing to help Oregon or Washington.

    And if we’re calling balls and strikes, the Ducks did bring in more AD revenue in 2022 than us @haie
    https://247sports.com/college/oregon/article/oregon-ducks-football-revenue-sharing-expenses-pac-12-conference--211577015/amp/

    Alas, these faggy White Wakanda IPAs are killing my brain cells and making the Stockholm syndrome worse.
    Oregon hosted everyone this year. Including Washington and Utah.

    Next year, their schedule sucks outside of USC.
    Like I said. I’m drinking.
    So am I.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    edited July 2023
    Oregon $153M
    uw $145M

    Haie, why does Oregon have to revenue share with schools like uw that finished in the red?

    Swap uw for sc.
    OSU at home.
    The Buffs with Sanders will offset Utah.
    Throw in wsu and Cal.
    I think Oregon is gonna be alright.

    Another miss by Haie.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,268 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    Oregon $153M
    uw $145M

    Haie, why does Oregon have to revenue share with schools like uw that finished in the red?

    Swap uw for sc.
    OSU at home.
    The Buffs with Sanders will offset Utah.
    Throw in wsu and Cal.
    I think Oregon is gonna be alright.

    Another miss by Haie.

    Another "miss" by me.

    Last year was Oregon's big year to get everyone at home.

    UW's best home game last year was Beavlet on a Friday.

    Again, branding, academics, history, most recent year of football, why should UW give a shit about Oregon?
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Oregon $153M
    uw $145M

    Haie, why does Oregon have to revenue share with schools like uw that finished in the red?

    Swap uw for sc.
    OSU at home.
    The Buffs with Sanders will offset Utah.
    Throw in wsu and Cal.
    I think Oregon is gonna be alright.

    Another miss by Haie.

    Another "miss" by me.

    Last year was Oregon's big year to get everyone at home.

    UW's best home game last year was Beavlet on a Friday.

    Again, branding, academics, history, most recent year of football, why should UW give a shit about Oregon?
    Is someone asking them to?

    Your Athletic Dept. is in the red.

    After going 11-2.

    Branding and academics!

    LOL…..
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,268 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Oregon $153M
    uw $145M

    Haie, why does Oregon have to revenue share with schools like uw that finished in the red?

    Swap uw for sc.
    OSU at home.
    The Buffs with Sanders will offset Utah.
    Throw in wsu and Cal.
    I think Oregon is gonna be alright.

    Another miss by Haie.

    Another "miss" by me.

    Last year was Oregon's big year to get everyone at home.

    UW's best home game last year was Beavlet on a Friday.

    Again, branding, academics, history, most recent year of football, why should UW give a shit about Oregon?
    Is someone asking them to?

    Your Athletic Dept. is in the red.

    After going 11-2.

    Branding and academics!

    LOL…..
    Thank you for proving my point.

    I can get back to drinking and don't have to converse with a poor for the rest of the night.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Just for Haie.

    MSU attendance 68K
    OSU attendance 62K. Your “best home game,”

    Pathetic.
  • rodmansrage
    rodmansrage Member Posts: 6,402
    Why would oregon (or us? for that matter) when those schools join? gonna take a while for sdsu or whoever to get their guys in there, by then, we be gone.
  • Canadawg
    Canadawg Member Posts: 5,660
    Utah, TCU, Baylor were G5 teams that are now carrying their weight in their conferences. If SDSU is prepared to spend and support then it's no different
  • ntxduck
    ntxduck Member Posts: 6,214
    Canadawg said:

    Utah, TCU, Baylor were G5 teams that are now carrying their weight in their conferences. If SDSU is prepared to spend and support then it's no different

    Baylor wasn’t a g5 team
  • Canadawg
    Canadawg Member Posts: 5,660
    ntxduck said:

    Canadawg said:

    Utah, TCU, Baylor were G5 teams that are now carrying their weight in their conferences. If SDSU is prepared to spend and support then it's no different

    Baylor wasn’t a g5 team
    Oh well I hope a Baylor fan stumbles upon this then
  • EverettChris
    EverettChris Member Posts: 8,403 Standard Supporter
    edited July 2023
    First time/long time Husky. Refugee from Camp Tiny Hands.

    I hope to God the UDub is the second school against this as we and Oregon are the only two programs left when the LA schools leave that have any national following to sell a TV/streaming National contract. Why revenue share with a San Diego State, Boise State, or SMU who have zero broadcasting interest outside of their own markets, if SMU has even any interest in Dallas considering the Cowboys and all of the Texas and aTm alumni there?
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,766 Swaye's Wigwam

    First time/long time Husky. Refugee from Camp Tiny Hands.

    I hope to God the UDub is the second school against this as we and Oregon are the only two programs left when the LA schools leave that have any national following to sell a TV/streaming National contract. Why revenue share with a San Diego State, Boise State, or SMU who have zero broadcasting interest outside of their own markets, if SMU has even any interest in Dallas considering the Cowboys and all of the Texas and aTm alumni there?

    Good to see you Ms Everett. Big fan. Early teen Chuck used to pop wood while watching you battle (and lose to) Martina Navratilova.
  • Fenderbender123
    Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989

    First time/long time Husky. Refugee from Camp Tiny Hands.

    I hope to God the UDub is the second school against this as we and Oregon are the only two programs left when the LA schools leave that have any national following to sell a TV/streaming National contract. Why revenue share with a San Diego State, Boise State, or SMU who have zero broadcasting interest outside of their own markets, if SMU has even any interest in Dallas considering the Cowboys and all of the Texas and aTm alumni there?

    Agree.

    Also, tell Jim Rome I said "hey".
  • dirtysouwfdawg
    dirtysouwfdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,405 Swaye's Wigwam

    First time/long time Husky. Refugee from Camp Tiny Hands.

    I hope to God the UDub is the second school against this as we and Oregon are the only two programs left when the LA schools leave that have any national following to sell a TV/streaming National contract. Why revenue share with a San Diego State, Boise State, or SMU who have zero broadcasting interest outside of their own markets, if SMU has even any interest in Dallas considering the Cowboys and all of the Texas and aTm alumni there?

    No one knows that SMU exists. They didn’t even know that TCU existed until last year.