Big if true
Comments
-
Will Oregon ever get off of this list?
-
Best bully in the business, nuff said on that.dnc said:Will Oregon ever get off of this list?
-
Oregon can't even invent one like REAL football schools do
-
dnc said:
Will Oregon ever get off of this list?
Gotta admit. I laughed my ass off! Good Show -
-
-
Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.
-
Also on that line are the Beavers and COCKS.dnc said:Will Oregon ever get off of this list?
NO means NO -
WoolleyDoog said:
Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.
-
Jesus Christ.WoolleyDoog said:Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.
-
WoolleyDoog said:
Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.
-
That was bad, and you should feel bad.WoolleyDoog said:Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.
-
Mods?WoolleyDoog said:Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.
-
First you say out loud on the podcast that you don't really read Pup's stuff. Now you post this shit?WoolleyDoog said:Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.
-
-
GrundleStiltzkin said:
That was bad, and you should feel bad.WoolleyDoog said:Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.
-
Ty for the shoutoutGrundleStiltzkin said:@WoolleyDoog is under there somewhere
-
Keep the gay canuck shit off OUR bored! Go Avs!
-
The lady doth protest too muchcoronabruin said:Keep the gay canuck shit off OUR bored! Go Avs!
-
-
Oregon came within a C-hair though of shutting us the fuck up on 1991.WoolleyDoog said:Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.
I don't know why we haven't built a statue for Cam Newton at the Husky Stadium monuments park. -
Go burn your piece of shit city to the ground after losing another cup final, ya fuckin no natty fish fister.Canadawg said: -
It just means morecoronabruin said:
Go burn your piece of shit city to the ground after losing another cup final, ya fuckin no natty fish fister.Canadawg said: -
Anyone under the age of 37ish who answers no to this is a liarWoolleyDoog said:Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.
-
Only because, like TCU will show, getting to a championship no matter the results seems to give you momentum that lasts a really long time.ntxduck said:
Anyone under the age of 37ish who answers no to this is a liarWoolleyDoog said:Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.
-
ntxduck said:
Anyone under the age of 37ish who answers no to this is a liarWoolleyDoog said:Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.
-
ntxduck said:
Anyone under the age of 37ish who answers no to this is a liarWoolleyDoog said:Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.
-
WoolleyDoog said:
Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.
-
I said 37 not 137RaceBannon said:ntxduck said:
Anyone under the age of 37ish who answers no to this is a liarWoolleyDoog said:Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.
-
There's somebody here other than Fudgie that's under 37?ntxduck said:
Anyone under the age of 37ish who answers no to this is a liarWoolleyDoog said:Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.
