Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

63% Of Men Under 30 Are Single

2»

Comments

  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,538
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    haie said:

    Most chicks are fat, most dudes are losers, and everything costs too much. It ain't that hard to see why this is the case

    Just because your fat ass can only pork fatties doesnt mean all women are fat, hombre

    Hth
    There are plenty of nice women under 30.

    Men under 30 are sensitive retards that don't work hard and who can count their blowjob experiences on one hand. From women, on one pinky.
    Wait as in they've got blown by dudes?
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,735
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Don't like her droopy eye lids. Nice fun bags, though.

    Didn't watch or listen. TL; DW
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,478
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    edited May 2023
    So with 60% under 30 being fags and killing your children is a praise worthy and encouraged action what are the chances of a massive population drop in the United States? Whites all done? Replaced by illegal border crossers.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 18,954
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Sledog said:

    So with 60% under 30 being fags and killing your children is a praise worthy and encouraged action what are the chances of a massive population drop in the United States? Whites all done? Replaced by illegal border crossers.

    You just catching on to the fact that young adults aren't having kids?
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,478
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Mine are but they aren't Rump Rangers like you!
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,919
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    I have a contract

    You should speak to some of the twice married, pro-birth Catholics on the bored.

    There's a work around when it's their own choices that are involved.
    Did your wife stick with you even after you became a fat fuck?
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 100,707
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    I have a contract

    You should speak to some of the twice married, pro-birth Catholics on the bored.

    There's a work around when it's their own choices that are involved.
    Did your wife stick with you even after you became a fat fuck?
    Wife?
  • LebamDawgLebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,510
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Swaye's Wigwam

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    I have a contract

    You should speak to some of the twice married, pro-birth Catholics on the bored.

    There's a work around when it's their own choices that are involved.
    Did your wife stick with you even after you became a fat fuck?
    Wife?
    isn't that what they call the second dad in a gay relationship? I might be confused - odds are very likely
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 18,954
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    edited May 2023
    https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-low-can-americas-birth-rate-go-before-its-a-problem/

    Although the COVID-19 pandemic seems to have accelerated this decline, the drop has been underway for years. The total fertility rate — the average number of children a woman is expected to have over her lifetime — now sits at 1.64 children per woman in the U.S. Not only is this the lowest rate recorded since the government began tracking these stats in the 1930s, but it’s well below the so-called “replacement-level fertility” of about 2.1.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 100,707
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-low-can-americas-birth-rate-go-before-its-a-problem/

    Although the COVID-19 pandemic seems to have accelerated this decline, the drop has been underway for years. The total fertility rate — the average number of children a woman is expected to have over her lifetime — now sits at 1.64 children per woman in the U.S. Not only is this the lowest rate recorded since the government began tracking these stats in the 1930s, but it’s well below the so-called “replacement-level fertility” of about 2.1.

    Cool story bro
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,699
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter

    HHusky said:

    https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-low-can-americas-birth-rate-go-before-its-a-problem/

    Although the COVID-19 pandemic seems to have accelerated this decline, the drop has been underway for years. The total fertility rate — the average number of children a woman is expected to have over her lifetime — now sits at 1.64 children per woman in the U.S. Not only is this the lowest rate recorded since the government began tracking these stats in the 1930s, but it’s well below the so-called “replacement-level fertility” of about 2.1.

    Cool story bro
    I have this thought that if the government makes something more expensive, you get less of it. That make sense? Don't kids need to be housed, fed, stuck in expensive car seats until adulthood, given medical care, educated, clothed, groomed and then sexually mutilated? Sounds expensive.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 18,954
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-low-can-americas-birth-rate-go-before-its-a-problem/

    Although the COVID-19 pandemic seems to have accelerated this decline, the drop has been underway for years. The total fertility rate — the average number of children a woman is expected to have over her lifetime — now sits at 1.64 children per woman in the U.S. Not only is this the lowest rate recorded since the government began tracking these stats in the 1930s, but it’s well below the so-called “replacement-level fertility” of about 2.1.

    Cool story bro
    I have this thought that if the government makes something more expensive, you get less of it. That make sense? Don't kids need to be housed, fed, stuck in expensive car seats until adulthood, given medical care, educated, clothed, groomed and then sexually mutilated? Sounds expensive.
    Gasbag says it's the government that made kids expensive.

    Back in the good old days, kids didn't cost anything.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,699
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-low-can-americas-birth-rate-go-before-its-a-problem/

    Although the COVID-19 pandemic seems to have accelerated this decline, the drop has been underway for years. The total fertility rate — the average number of children a woman is expected to have over her lifetime — now sits at 1.64 children per woman in the U.S. Not only is this the lowest rate recorded since the government began tracking these stats in the 1930s, but it’s well below the so-called “replacement-level fertility” of about 2.1.

    Cool story bro
    I have this thought that if the government makes something more expensive, you get less of it. That make sense? Don't kids need to be housed, fed, stuck in expensive car seats until adulthood, given medical care, educated, clothed, groomed and then sexually mutilated? Sounds expensive.
    Gasbag says it's the government that made kids expensive.

    Back in the good old days, kids didn't cost anything.
    More of that hypothetical MBA fiscal analysis you are known for. I pity your imaginary clients. Back in the old days, kids could make some money to help out the family. Now you get child services called on you. You should look at the inflation adjusted cost of public education since the good old days. Here is a hint, the graph line goes up and not down.
  • BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,394
    First Comment First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Founders Club
    I don't buy any of the arguments about costs of raising kids as being the driving factor when deciding to have more or stop at 1. It's much more of a cultural shift and not unique to the US.
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,767
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Founders Club
    I think it does factor in a bit. The all-in costs of kids includes a bigger house and car. The delay in age of having them is a big part of it too, and part of that is financial.
Sign In or Register to comment.