Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Brayden Platt 4* LB Yelm drops Top-8
Comments
-
The team team gimmick lost to by 43?46XiJCAB said:
If you can’t recruit elite HS players you’re not winning a NC. You can play the portal all you want but you’re not going to be a serious title contender if that’s your strategy.Tequilla said:
No - it's understanding that with the number of players that go into the transfer portal that attrition within programs is at an all-time high so finding the right balance between players that can come in and develop in your program (and remain happy) and supplementing that roster with experienced players transferring in is paramount.46XiJCAB said:
3* MWC all-star recruits coping POTD.Tequilla said:High school recruiting is a really interesting business at the moment ...
Given the way the transfer portal is working PLUS the increasingly Charmin-soft quality of top players that are used to everybody sucking their dicks ...
We're seeing this at extreme levels in college hoops where the blue bloods seem to be focusing more than ever on transfers as the elite HS prospects are increasingly going to the G-league or overseas.
See UGA. -
He wanted to OV and we told him no (you can dispute this all you like). He's a JAG with some pretty muscles.
-
Coping POTD!haie said:
Top 25 last year. Even burnout Petersen was getting comparable classes to Oregon after a few seasons.46XiJCAB said:
Great, you'll finish in the Top-25 but never near the Top-5 with those type of classes.haie said:
We have a top 25 class and a staff that Bama is trying to poach from.46XiJCAB said:
Did I compare UO to UGA? You do this shit all the time. Only dumbasses believe that you can recruit less than elite HS talent and believe you can even have a shot at winning a NC.haie said:
I see UGA and I see no scenario where Oregon is like them in any way. Especially not with a Keg Boy fucking coach where young inexperienced coaches don't even make the CFP let alone win them.46XiJCAB said:
If you can’t recruit elite HS players you’re not winning a NC. You can play the portal all you want but you’re not going to be a serious title contender if that’s your strategy.Tequilla said:
No - it's understanding that with the number of players that go into the transfer portal that attrition within programs is at an all-time high so finding the right balance between players that can come in and develop in your program (and remain happy) and supplementing that roster with experienced players transferring in is paramount.46XiJCAB said:
3* MWC all-star recruits coping POTD.Tequilla said:High school recruiting is a really interesting business at the moment ...
Given the way the transfer portal is working PLUS the increasingly Charmin-soft quality of top players that are used to everybody sucking their dicks ...
We're seeing this at extreme levels in college hoops where the blue bloods seem to be focusing more than ever on transfers as the elite HS prospects are increasingly going to the G-league or overseas.
See UGA.
Participation trophies like TCU earned don’t count.
But I’m good if Fats D is going with this strategy.
Good luck with Keg Boy fag.
Congrats!
Fag.
Enjoy 2023!
An elite staff that can develop transfers and previous coache's recruits. Not worried about talent acquisition and haven't been since this year.
I'll take our shit over whatever the fuck Keg Boy is atm. -
Some great fanfic in this thread. 20 year old BPT always brings the heat while on smoke breaks from his job at the Verizon kiosk at NorthGate Mall.
-
Don’t worry Lanning and his staff will leave some scraps behind for Fats D.backthepack said:
It's april are you fucking stupid?46XiJCAB said:
Cool story, should we compare overall records, bowl appearances and title games played in and head to head series? Or are we gonna walk down memory lane to 1992?BleachedAnusDawg said:
Enjoy being the kings of doing less with more. You idiots have been talking about recruiting for duckades and have no natty to show for all of daddy's money.46XiJCAB said:
Great, you'll finish in the Top-25 but never near the Top-5 with those type of classes.haie said:
We have a top 25 class and a staff that Bama is trying to poach from.46XiJCAB said:
Did I compare UO to UGA? You do this shit all the time. Only dumbasses believe that you can recruit less than elite HS talent and believe you can even have a shot at winning a NC.haie said:
I see UGA and I see no scenario where Oregon is like them in any way. Especially not with a Keg Boy fucking coach where young inexperienced coaches don't even make the CFP let alone win them.46XiJCAB said:
If you can’t recruit elite HS players you’re not winning a NC. You can play the portal all you want but you’re not going to be a serious title contender if that’s your strategy.Tequilla said:
No - it's understanding that with the number of players that go into the transfer portal that attrition within programs is at an all-time high so finding the right balance between players that can come in and develop in your program (and remain happy) and supplementing that roster with experienced players transferring in is paramount.46XiJCAB said:
3* MWC all-star recruits coping POTD.Tequilla said:High school recruiting is a really interesting business at the moment ...
Given the way the transfer portal is working PLUS the increasingly Charmin-soft quality of top players that are used to everybody sucking their dicks ...
We're seeing this at extreme levels in college hoops where the blue bloods seem to be focusing more than ever on transfers as the elite HS prospects are increasingly going to the G-league or overseas.
See UGA.
Participation trophies like TCU earned don’t count.
But I’m good if Fats D is going with this strategy.
Good luck with Keg Boy fag.
Congrats!
Fag.
Enjoy 2023!
Current uw 24' class #65. UO #11.
Current uw 25' class no results. UO #11.
#YeahButStill -
The shitty 4-5* stars that have dominated uw for over 20 years now? Those guys?LawDawg1 said:
And when the next douche boy coach comes to Oregon and “has to clean house” of the shitty 4 and 5 star players from the prior regime, will this even matter?46XiJCAB said:
Cool story, should we compare overall records, bowl appearances and title games played in and head to head series? Or are we gonna walk down memory lane to 1992?BleachedAnusDawg said:
Enjoy being the kings of doing less with more. You idiots have been talking about recruiting for duckades and have no natty to show for all of daddy's money.46XiJCAB said:
Great, you'll finish in the Top-25 but never near the Top-5 with those type of classes.haie said:
We have a top 25 class and a staff that Bama is trying to poach from.46XiJCAB said:
Did I compare UO to UGA? You do this shit all the time. Only dumbasses believe that you can recruit less than elite HS talent and believe you can even have a shot at winning a NC.haie said:
I see UGA and I see no scenario where Oregon is like them in any way. Especially not with a Keg Boy fucking coach where young inexperienced coaches don't even make the CFP let alone win them.46XiJCAB said:
If you can’t recruit elite HS players you’re not winning a NC. You can play the portal all you want but you’re not going to be a serious title contender if that’s your strategy.Tequilla said:
No - it's understanding that with the number of players that go into the transfer portal that attrition within programs is at an all-time high so finding the right balance between players that can come in and develop in your program (and remain happy) and supplementing that roster with experienced players transferring in is paramount.46XiJCAB said:
3* MWC all-star recruits coping POTD.Tequilla said:High school recruiting is a really interesting business at the moment ...
Given the way the transfer portal is working PLUS the increasingly Charmin-soft quality of top players that are used to everybody sucking their dicks ...
We're seeing this at extreme levels in college hoops where the blue bloods seem to be focusing more than ever on transfers as the elite HS prospects are increasingly going to the G-league or overseas.
See UGA.
Participation trophies like TCU earned don’t count.
But I’m good if Fats D is going with this strategy.
Good luck with Keg Boy fag.
Congrats!
Fag.
Enjoy 2023!
Current uw 24' class #65. UO #11.
Current uw 25' class no results. UO #11.
#YeahButStill
Says more about uw football than Oregon. -
WDWHA POTD!backthepack said:He wanted to OV and we told him no (you can dispute this all you like). He's a JAG with some pretty muscles.
Sure LOL……. -
Talks about "coping" then lays down another 3 shit posts for good measure. Not upset. At all.
-
He would have been good 25 years ago. He's too stiff and not fast enough to cover in space hth.46XiJCAB said:
WDWHA POTD!backthepack said:He wanted to OV and we told him no (you can dispute this all you like). He's a JAG with some pretty muscles.
Sure LOL……. -
Are you saying Oregon has been getting 4 and 5 star classes for 20 years?46XiJCAB said:
The shitty 4-5* stars that have dominated uw for over 20 years now? Those guys?LawDawg1 said:
And when the next douche boy coach comes to Oregon and “has to clean house” of the shitty 4 and 5 star players from the prior regime, will this even matter?46XiJCAB said:
Cool story, should we compare overall records, bowl appearances and title games played in and head to head series? Or are we gonna walk down memory lane to 1992?BleachedAnusDawg said:
Enjoy being the kings of doing less with more. You idiots have been talking about recruiting for duckades and have no natty to show for all of daddy's money.46XiJCAB said:
Great, you'll finish in the Top-25 but never near the Top-5 with those type of classes.haie said:
We have a top 25 class and a staff that Bama is trying to poach from.46XiJCAB said:
Did I compare UO to UGA? You do this shit all the time. Only dumbasses believe that you can recruit less than elite HS talent and believe you can even have a shot at winning a NC.haie said:
I see UGA and I see no scenario where Oregon is like them in any way. Especially not with a Keg Boy fucking coach where young inexperienced coaches don't even make the CFP let alone win them.46XiJCAB said:
If you can’t recruit elite HS players you’re not winning a NC. You can play the portal all you want but you’re not going to be a serious title contender if that’s your strategy.Tequilla said:
No - it's understanding that with the number of players that go into the transfer portal that attrition within programs is at an all-time high so finding the right balance between players that can come in and develop in your program (and remain happy) and supplementing that roster with experienced players transferring in is paramount.46XiJCAB said:
3* MWC all-star recruits coping POTD.Tequilla said:High school recruiting is a really interesting business at the moment ...
Given the way the transfer portal is working PLUS the increasingly Charmin-soft quality of top players that are used to everybody sucking their dicks ...
We're seeing this at extreme levels in college hoops where the blue bloods seem to be focusing more than ever on transfers as the elite HS prospects are increasingly going to the G-league or overseas.
See UGA.
Participation trophies like TCU earned don’t count.
But I’m good if Fats D is going with this strategy.
Good luck with Keg Boy fag.
Congrats!
Fag.
Enjoy 2023!
Current uw 24' class #65. UO #11.
Current uw 25' class no results. UO #11.
#YeahButStill
Says more about uw football than Oregon.
-
No, I’m saying Oregon has dominated uw and the PAC-12 with and without them. Facts.LawDawg1 said:
Are you saying Oregon has been getting 4 and 5 star classes for 20 years?46XiJCAB said:
The shitty 4-5* stars that have dominated uw for over 20 years now? Those guys?LawDawg1 said:
And when the next douche boy coach comes to Oregon and “has to clean house” of the shitty 4 and 5 star players from the prior regime, will this even matter?46XiJCAB said:
Cool story, should we compare overall records, bowl appearances and title games played in and head to head series? Or are we gonna walk down memory lane to 1992?BleachedAnusDawg said:
Enjoy being the kings of doing less with more. You idiots have been talking about recruiting for duckades and have no natty to show for all of daddy's money.46XiJCAB said:
Great, you'll finish in the Top-25 but never near the Top-5 with those type of classes.haie said:
We have a top 25 class and a staff that Bama is trying to poach from.46XiJCAB said:
Did I compare UO to UGA? You do this shit all the time. Only dumbasses believe that you can recruit less than elite HS talent and believe you can even have a shot at winning a NC.haie said:
I see UGA and I see no scenario where Oregon is like them in any way. Especially not with a Keg Boy fucking coach where young inexperienced coaches don't even make the CFP let alone win them.46XiJCAB said:
If you can’t recruit elite HS players you’re not winning a NC. You can play the portal all you want but you’re not going to be a serious title contender if that’s your strategy.Tequilla said:
No - it's understanding that with the number of players that go into the transfer portal that attrition within programs is at an all-time high so finding the right balance between players that can come in and develop in your program (and remain happy) and supplementing that roster with experienced players transferring in is paramount.46XiJCAB said:
3* MWC all-star recruits coping POTD.Tequilla said:High school recruiting is a really interesting business at the moment ...
Given the way the transfer portal is working PLUS the increasingly Charmin-soft quality of top players that are used to everybody sucking their dicks ...
We're seeing this at extreme levels in college hoops where the blue bloods seem to be focusing more than ever on transfers as the elite HS prospects are increasingly going to the G-league or overseas.
See UGA.
Participation trophies like TCU earned don’t count.
But I’m good if Fats D is going with this strategy.
Good luck with Keg Boy fag.
Congrats!
Fag.
Enjoy 2023!
Current uw 24' class #65. UO #11.
Current uw 25' class no results. UO #11.
#YeahButStill
Says more about uw football than Oregon. -
Are you retarded?haie said:Talks about "coping" then lays down another 3 shit posts for good measure. Not upset. At all.
If I didn’t answer you duck obsessed Doogs you’d all feel ignored. Like I said. This is shits and giggles for me.
When you’re the clearly superior program there’s nothing to be upset about.
Enjoy 2023!
Peak Fats D! -
You suck at reading comprehension. My post was about 4 and 5 stars from the prior regime. You expanded it to 20+ years. Now you’re saying you’re not talking about 4 or 5 star players. WTF.46XiJCAB said:
No, I’m saying Oregon has dominated uw and the PAC-12 with and without them. Facts.LawDawg1 said:
Are you saying Oregon has been getting 4 and 5 star classes for 20 years?46XiJCAB said:
The shitty 4-5* stars that have dominated uw for over 20 years now? Those guys?LawDawg1 said:
And when the next douche boy coach comes to Oregon and “has to clean house” of the shitty 4 and 5 star players from the prior regime, will this even matter?46XiJCAB said:
Cool story, should we compare overall records, bowl appearances and title games played in and head to head series? Or are we gonna walk down memory lane to 1992?BleachedAnusDawg said:
Enjoy being the kings of doing less with more. You idiots have been talking about recruiting for duckades and have no natty to show for all of daddy's money.46XiJCAB said:
Great, you'll finish in the Top-25 but never near the Top-5 with those type of classes.haie said:
We have a top 25 class and a staff that Bama is trying to poach from.46XiJCAB said:
Did I compare UO to UGA? You do this shit all the time. Only dumbasses believe that you can recruit less than elite HS talent and believe you can even have a shot at winning a NC.haie said:
I see UGA and I see no scenario where Oregon is like them in any way. Especially not with a Keg Boy fucking coach where young inexperienced coaches don't even make the CFP let alone win them.46XiJCAB said:
If you can’t recruit elite HS players you’re not winning a NC. You can play the portal all you want but you’re not going to be a serious title contender if that’s your strategy.Tequilla said:
No - it's understanding that with the number of players that go into the transfer portal that attrition within programs is at an all-time high so finding the right balance between players that can come in and develop in your program (and remain happy) and supplementing that roster with experienced players transferring in is paramount.46XiJCAB said:
3* MWC all-star recruits coping POTD.Tequilla said:High school recruiting is a really interesting business at the moment ...
Given the way the transfer portal is working PLUS the increasingly Charmin-soft quality of top players that are used to everybody sucking their dicks ...
We're seeing this at extreme levels in college hoops where the blue bloods seem to be focusing more than ever on transfers as the elite HS prospects are increasingly going to the G-league or overseas.
See UGA.
Participation trophies like TCU earned don’t count.
But I’m good if Fats D is going with this strategy.
Good luck with Keg Boy fag.
Congrats!
Fag.
Enjoy 2023!
Current uw 24' class #65. UO #11.
Current uw 25' class no results. UO #11.
#YeahButStill
Says more about uw football than Oregon. -
I broke down the the 14 5* over on the recruiting board. Slice it anyway you want Oregon has owned uw with zero. 1,2,3,4 5* guys.LawDawg1 said:
You suck at reading comprehension. My post was about 4 and 5 stars from the prior regime. You expanded it to 20+ years. Now you’re saying you’re not talking about 4 or 5 star players. WTF.46XiJCAB said:
No, I’m saying Oregon has dominated uw and the PAC-12 with and without them. Facts.LawDawg1 said:
Are you saying Oregon has been getting 4 and 5 star classes for 20 years?46XiJCAB said:
The shitty 4-5* stars that have dominated uw for over 20 years now? Those guys?LawDawg1 said:
And when the next douche boy coach comes to Oregon and “has to clean house” of the shitty 4 and 5 star players from the prior regime, will this even matter?46XiJCAB said:
Cool story, should we compare overall records, bowl appearances and title games played in and head to head series? Or are we gonna walk down memory lane to 1992?BleachedAnusDawg said:
Enjoy being the kings of doing less with more. You idiots have been talking about recruiting for duckades and have no natty to show for all of daddy's money.46XiJCAB said:
Great, you'll finish in the Top-25 but never near the Top-5 with those type of classes.haie said:
We have a top 25 class and a staff that Bama is trying to poach from.46XiJCAB said:
Did I compare UO to UGA? You do this shit all the time. Only dumbasses believe that you can recruit less than elite HS talent and believe you can even have a shot at winning a NC.haie said:
I see UGA and I see no scenario where Oregon is like them in any way. Especially not with a Keg Boy fucking coach where young inexperienced coaches don't even make the CFP let alone win them.46XiJCAB said:
If you can’t recruit elite HS players you’re not winning a NC. You can play the portal all you want but you’re not going to be a serious title contender if that’s your strategy.Tequilla said:
No - it's understanding that with the number of players that go into the transfer portal that attrition within programs is at an all-time high so finding the right balance between players that can come in and develop in your program (and remain happy) and supplementing that roster with experienced players transferring in is paramount.46XiJCAB said:
3* MWC all-star recruits coping POTD.Tequilla said:High school recruiting is a really interesting business at the moment ...
Given the way the transfer portal is working PLUS the increasingly Charmin-soft quality of top players that are used to everybody sucking their dicks ...
We're seeing this at extreme levels in college hoops where the blue bloods seem to be focusing more than ever on transfers as the elite HS prospects are increasingly going to the G-league or overseas.
See UGA.
Participation trophies like TCU earned don’t count.
But I’m good if Fats D is going with this strategy.
Good luck with Keg Boy fag.
Congrats!
Fag.
Enjoy 2023!
Current uw 24' class #65. UO #11.
Current uw 25' class no results. UO #11.
#YeahButStill
Says more about uw football than Oregon.
-
46XiJCAB said:
Cool story, should we compare overall records, bowl appearances and title games played in and head to head series? Or are we gonna walk down memory lane to 1992?BleachedAnusDawg said:
Enjoy being the kings of doing less with more. You idiots have been talking about recruiting for duckades and have no natty to show for all of daddy's money.46XiJCAB said:
Great, you'll finish in the Top-25 but never near the Top-5 with those type of classes.haie said:
We have a top 25 class and a staff that Bama is trying to poach from.46XiJCAB said:
Did I compare UO to UGA? You do this shit all the time. Only dumbasses believe that you can recruit less than elite HS talent and believe you can even have a shot at winning a NC.haie said:
I see UGA and I see no scenario where Oregon is like them in any way. Especially not with a Keg Boy fucking coach where young inexperienced coaches don't even make the CFP let alone win them.46XiJCAB said:
If you can’t recruit elite HS players you’re not winning a NC. You can play the portal all you want but you’re not going to be a serious title contender if that’s your strategy.Tequilla said:
No - it's understanding that with the number of players that go into the transfer portal that attrition within programs is at an all-time high so finding the right balance between players that can come in and develop in your program (and remain happy) and supplementing that roster with experienced players transferring in is paramount.46XiJCAB said:
3* MWC all-star recruits coping POTD.Tequilla said:High school recruiting is a really interesting business at the moment ...
Given the way the transfer portal is working PLUS the increasingly Charmin-soft quality of top players that are used to everybody sucking their dicks ...
We're seeing this at extreme levels in college hoops where the blue bloods seem to be focusing more than ever on transfers as the elite HS prospects are increasingly going to the G-league or overseas.
See UGA.
Participation trophies like TCU earned don’t count.
But I’m good if Fats D is going with this strategy.
Good luck with Keg Boy fag.
Congrats!
Fag.
Enjoy 2023!
Current uw 24' class #65. UO #11.
Current uw 25' class no results. UO #11.
#YeahButStill
-
One thing WA has in this century that OR doesn’t: An 0-12 (winless) season.
One thing OR has in this century that WA doesn’t: 12 wins in a row against their main rival.
UW squeaked by OSEwe in Seattle last year. The game is in Corvallis this year.
USC is overwhelmingly favored to win the conference in 2023, not UW.
-
One thing Oregon didn't have in 2022: A win over Washington.
-
One in a row . . . Congrats!
-
Since Rick Neuheisel’s tenure, Washington has had one Head Coach with a winning record against Oregon, to wit: Kalen DeBoer, 1-0.backthepack said:One thing Oregon didn't have in 2022: A win over Washington.
Washington has had four head coaches sonce Weasel who never beat Oregon, to wit: Gilby, 0-2; Willingham, 0-4; Sark, 0-5; and Jimmy Fake, 0-1.
Petersen, the Savior, was 2-4 against Oregon.
Kalen DeBoer, is 1-0.
The Doogs are very delusional after a big win.
Where’s Washington projected to finish in the PAC-12 next season?
Still have a Natty penciled in for next season?
LIPO
-
nice essay you sound delusional and scared
-
Just the facts, Fudgie.
-
BTP goes to bed with Lanning and Oregon on the brain. He knows what’s coming.
-
Fascinating history, as always CryptKeepertrublue said:
Since Rick Neuheisel’s tenure, Washington has had one Head Coach with a winning record against Oregon, to wit: Kalen DeBoer, 1-0.backthepack said:One thing Oregon didn't have in 2022: A win over Washington.
Washington has had four head coaches sonce Weasel who never beat Oregon, to wit: Gilby, 0-2; Willingham, 0-4; Sark, 0-5; and Jimmy Fake, 0-1.
Petersen, the Savior, was 2-4 against Oregon.
Kalen DeBoer, is 1-0.
The Doogs are very delusional after a big win.
Where’s Washington projected to finish in the PAC-12 next season?
Still have a Natty penciled in for next season?
LIPO -
It's cute that you act like you know shit.backthepack said:
He would have been good 25 years ago. He's too stiff and not fast enough to cover in space hth.46XiJCAB said:
WDWHA POTD!backthepack said:He wanted to OV and we told him no (you can dispute this all you like). He's a JAG with some pretty muscles.
Sure LOL…….
Guy just ran an 11.09 100M at 6' 2" 240+.
WDWHA.................LOL.......................BTP coping and struggling. -
How much of a life loser do you have to be to know this kid's 100m 🤣46XiJCAB said:
It's cute that you act like you know shit.backthepack said:
He would have been good 25 years ago. He's too stiff and not fast enough to cover in space hth.46XiJCAB said:
WDWHA POTD!backthepack said:He wanted to OV and we told him no (you can dispute this all you like). He's a JAG with some pretty muscles.
Sure LOL…….
Guy just ran an 11.09 100M at 6' 2" 240+.
WDWHA.................LOL.......................BTP coping and struggling.
Skippy's more emotionally invested in UW's recruiting than every doog here. -
I have a soft spot for Yelm. Don't know the kid but I want him. Not many Tornadoes go big school but the population is blowing up
My gramps had a mill in Yelm -
He doesn’t have any interest in playing for Fats D. That’s all you need to keep being reminded of.haie said:
How much of a life loser do you have to be to know this kid's 100m 🤣46XiJCAB said:
It's cute that you act like you know shit.backthepack said:
He would have been good 25 years ago. He's too stiff and not fast enough to cover in space hth.46XiJCAB said:
WDWHA POTD!backthepack said:He wanted to OV and we told him no (you can dispute this all you like). He's a JAG with some pretty muscles.
Sure LOL…….
Guy just ran an 11.09 100M at 6' 2" 240+.
WDWHA.................LOL.......................BTP coping and struggling.
Skippy's more emotionally invested in UW's recruiting than every doog here.
Loser. -
You're more obsessed with a D that trucked you? In the 4th quarter than anyone else here.46XiJCAB said:
He doesn’t have any interest in playing for Fats D. That’s all you need to keep being reminded of.haie said:
How much of a life loser do you have to be to know this kid's 100m 🤣46XiJCAB said:
It's cute that you act like you know shit.backthepack said:
He would have been good 25 years ago. He's too stiff and not fast enough to cover in space hth.46XiJCAB said:
WDWHA POTD!backthepack said:He wanted to OV and we told him no (you can dispute this all you like). He's a JAG with some pretty muscles.
Sure LOL…….
Guy just ran an 11.09 100M at 6' 2" 240+.
WDWHA.................LOL.......................BTP coping and struggling.
Skippy's more emotionally invested in UW's recruiting than every doog here.
Loser.
Remember that Nix couldn't even get within field goal range with the game on the line either.
Our coach is an offensive guy. Your? coach is a defensive guy that took it up the ass from Beavlet for 19 straight runs. -
Just the facts, BaseKunt.Baseman said:
Fascinating history, as always CryptKeepertrublue said:
Since Rick Neuheisel’s tenure, Washington has had one Head Coach with a winning record against Oregon, to wit: Kalen DeBoer, 1-0.backthepack said:One thing Oregon didn't have in 2022: A win over Washington.
Washington has had four head coaches sonce Weasel who never beat Oregon, to wit: Gilby, 0-2; Willingham, 0-4; Sark, 0-5; and Jimmy Fake, 0-1.
Petersen, the Savior, was 2-4 against Oregon.
Kalen DeBoer, is 1-0.
The Doogs are very delusional after a big win.
Where’s Washington projected to finish in the PAC-12 next season?
Still have a Natty penciled in for next season?
LIPO
-
Cool story Bro. I'd keep reliving the greatest Husky win in nearly a decade too. It was BIG for you. Those 3 points. I hope Fats D at least sent Lanning a thank-you for the Win card.haie said:
You're more obsessed with a D that trucked you? In the 4th quarter than anyone else here.46XiJCAB said:
He doesn’t have any interest in playing for Fats D. That’s all you need to keep being reminded of.haie said:
How much of a life loser do you have to be to know this kid's 100m 🤣46XiJCAB said:
It's cute that you act like you know shit.backthepack said:
He would have been good 25 years ago. He's too stiff and not fast enough to cover in space hth.46XiJCAB said:
WDWHA POTD!backthepack said:He wanted to OV and we told him no (you can dispute this all you like). He's a JAG with some pretty muscles.
Sure LOL…….
Guy just ran an 11.09 100M at 6' 2" 240+.
WDWHA.................LOL.......................BTP coping and struggling.
Skippy's more emotionally invested in UW's recruiting than every doog here.
Loser.
Remember that Nix couldn't even get within field goal range with the game on the line either.
Our coach is an offensive guy. Your? coach is a defensive guy that took it up the ass from Beavlet for 19 straight runs.
