Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
WOOF!
dnc
Member Posts: 56,855
We now have hard evidence Ducks can't develop.
Always nice when actual data confirms your priors.
Twelve 4 stars drafted out of 87 is worse than I wood have guessed quite honestly.
Comments
-
Well now that UW has 3 five stars I guess this puts us at 33%, assuming at this point Smalls and Huard are not drafted. Unless I'm missing a five star other than Shaq.
-
The 5 star % isn’t bad considering the sample size but goddamn 12/87 is terrible.
-
I'm assuming that you have to have entered the draft to be a factor on the denominator?
I'd love to dig more into the TCU numbers ... I know we had a number of dudes for a while flake out for being a little too fast strategy -
-
The Athletic dug into 11 years of data to find the answer. For three-, four- and five-star prospects, which schools had the highest percentage of prospects drafted?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:@dnc?? A Q??!!??
What’s the tim frame on this?
Using the 247Sports Composite Rating, we tallied the total three-, four- and five-star prospects signed at each of the 65 Power 5 programs from 2009 through 2019 and how many of each star rating were drafted from 2012 through 2022 in the seven-round event that features more than 250 picks each year. Then we tallied the percentages for each school. The top and bottom 10 featured some usual suspects and some surprises.
To prevent small sample sizes, we limited the rankings to schools that signed at least five five-star prospects and 20 four-star prospects.
Here, we examine the core question: If you’re a three-, four- or five-star recruit, which school gives you the best chance to go pro?
-
TYFYSdnc said:
The Athletic dug into 11 years of data to find the answer. For three-, four- and five-star prospects, which schools had the highest percentage of prospects drafted?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:@dnc?? A Q??!!??
What’s the tim frame on this?
Using the 247Sports Composite Rating, we tallied the total three-, four- and five-star prospects signed at each of the 65 Power 5 programs from 2009 through 2019 and how many of each star rating were drafted from 2012 through 2022 in the seven-round event that features more than 250 picks each year. Then we tallied the percentages for each school. The top and bottom 10 featured some usual suspects and some surprises.
To prevent small sample sizes, we limited the rankings to schools that signed at least five five-star prospects and 20 four-star prospects.
Here, we examine the core question: If you’re a three-, four- or five-star recruit, which school gives you the best chance to go pro? -
take this to the TCU boredTequilla said:I'm assuming that you have to have entered the draft to be a factor on the denominator?
I'd love to dig more into the TCU numbers ... I know we had a number of dudes for a while flake out for being a little too fast strategy -
Any chance someone can post this article in the Wam?
-
-
What does this say about the "evaluations" of Brandon Huffman and Greg Biggins and the rest?
