Biden DOJ Crusade to Jail Young Man for Anti-Hillary Memes Just Got Much Uglier

HHusky said:

It was just satire!

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1360816/download

Fascist approves of fascism

Film at 11

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

It was just satire!

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1360816/download

Fascist approves of fascism

Film at 11

The confrontation of accusers defense is a good appeal issue. No disagreement.

Minimizing an organized fraud as a joke is something you should consider when the SEC knocks at your door.

Leave Hillary alone?

How about the government just fucks off

Biden is a fascist Dictator

I remember when you were against that

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

It was just satire!

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1360816/download

Fascist approves of fascism

Film at 11

The confrontation of accusers defense is a good appeal issue. No disagreement.

Minimizing an organized fraud as a joke is something you should consider when the SEC knocks at your door.

Leave Hillary alone?

How about the government just fucks off

Biden is a fascist Dictator

I remember when you were against that

So the government should just stop engaging in law enforcement.

(That moment when "libertarianism" reveals itself as anarchy.)

Your belief that this action filed 48 hours after Biden's inauguration didn't arise under Daddy's administration is sweetly naive.

The strawman
You don't want any law enforcement

The Trump made him do it

And a daddy

I guess I must have missed the philosophical nuance in How about the government just fucks off.

I guess you're stupid

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

People might want to actually read the article

And the criminal complaint.

#Just_a_Twitter_Joke!

Bootlicker heard from

It's a CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

Yeah no shit. That's why the government can fuck off, fascist

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

People might want to actually read the article

And the criminal complaint.

#Just_a_Twitter_Joke!

Bootlicker heard from

It's a CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

Yeah no shit. That's why the government can fuck off, fascist

It's got factual allegations and shit.

Government's BOP, of course.

But it's a wee bit more detailed concerning intent to defraud than you girls want to let on.

No it isn't

And it's the same government that spent two years lying about J6

And lied about Hunter's laptop

BUT THE GOVENMENT SAID SO

Bootlicker

All of that is bad enough, but newly-unsealed documents released on Wednesday reveal new, sinister depths to the DOJ’s agenda.

Last fall, we warned about a new tool in the arsenal of weapons used by the regime to justify censorship and rolling back the basic rights of Americans. With this new tool, corrupt journalists like Taylor Lorenz can dox, harass, and lie about anyone they want and enjoy total immunity from criticism. Why? Well, if you dare to criticize a journalist like Lorenz, someone, somewhere, might become outraged and decide to commit an act of violence. With this remarkable censorship tool, the media’s attack dog journalists are magically absolved from any criticism because some nut job, somewhere, maybe, at sometime, might act violently upon this criticism.

The tool goes by the name “stochastic terrorism.”

Basically, “stochastic terrorism” is the idea that, when somebody on the right criticizes somebody, they aren’t really just making a political argument. Instead, they are trying to “stoke hatred” in the expectation that some random third party will be “radicalized” and then commit political violence on their behalf.

…

[T]he concept perfectly flows from being a personal attack to being a legal one. The implicit claim behind every complaint about stochastic terror is that dissident speech isn’t really speech, and therefore it doesn’t really deserve protection, because conservatives, or anyone liberals don’t like, harbor a hidden inner desire to inspire violent attacks. Any complaint about the liberals or, more importantly, the Regime, in any venue, can now be dressed up as “violent” speech deserving no constitutional protection.



Back in October, “stochastic terrorism” was just a concept for the media, the blogosphere, and the Twitterati, and it was only a weapon for curbing speech.

But everything moves faster in the digital age. Just five months later, the Biden Department of Justice is using the logic of “stochastic terrorism” to justify stripping core constitutional due process rights from dissident American voices.

In its latest filings, the DOJ reveals that one of the group chats it is currently using as evidence against Mackey contained a person who is now working with the FBI as a federal informant. According to the government, the “Confidential Witness” (or CW) was a pro-Trump, “alt right” leader who pleaded guilty to the same conspiracy to deprive civil rights charges that Mackey faces, and is now collaborating with the government.

In its filings, the government declines to say what CW’s current role with the government is, except that he is “presently engaged in proactive investigations, working with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), and may engage in additional investigations in the future.” Based on that statement, the government is asking that CW’s identity be kept secret, and that Mackey’s defense team be barred from asking any questions about CW’s current work.

This is a much bolder request than it might seem to the legally uninitiated. The Sixth Amendment of the Bill of Rights guarantees the right of any criminal defendant to “be confronted with the witnesses against him.” Like most constitutional rights, this law is not absolute, but limitations to it have historically been very limited. Courts have long disallowed anonymous witnesses due to the Sixth Amendment, except in extreme circumstances involving violent, organized criminal organizations with the capacity to retaliate against witnesses and their families. And even then, courts have restricted the right to testify anonymously. For instance, in 2014, the U.S. 10th Circuit said this, about the possible danger of retaliation from the ruthless Salvadoran street gang MS-13.

“…a generalized statement about danger — such as anyone who testifies against one of [MS 13’s] members faces danger from [MS-13] — would be insufficient to show that a threat against a witness was actual and not a result of conjecture.” [United States v. Gutierrez de Lopez, 761 F.3d 1123, 1140 (10th Cir. 2014)]

But now, in the Mackey case, the Biden DOJ asserts that its witness’s identity must be hidden, because if not, he might face, wait for it… harassment on the Internet!

Probably Ray Epps

HHusky said:

Goduckies said:

I would say it isn't just satire because you have to take in how dumb the democrat voters are... but is that a crime hell no.

The "January 6th was a reverential tour of the Capitol" crowd says some voters are dumb.

Nobody but you and your lying ilk said that

No one

Not Tucker Not me Not anyone

A weak deflection from 2 years of lies about J6

Pathetic

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Goduckies said:

I would say it isn't just satire because you have to take in how dumb the democrat voters are... but is that a crime hell no.

The "January 6th was a reverential tour of the Capitol" crowd says some voters are dumb.

Nobody but you and your lying ilk said that

No one

Not Tucker Not me Not anyone

A weak deflection from 2 years of lies about J6

Pathetic

Lordy, I know there are tapes.

A weaker deflection