Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Can we offer this Ukranian solider a scholarship?
Comments
-
The Russian military. Not MoscowPurpleThrobber said:
I was told US F22's could wipe Russia off the face of the earth.Goduckies said:
My issue is what is the endgame? And what if Ukraine really starts kicking butt and Putin ratchets it up.... we don't want nukes, even tactical ones. Putin has fought this war without those... let's not provoke him.RoadTrip said:
Thank you for considerate discussion. A few billion is one thing but several hundred and potential troops is quite another. Not saying we're there yet so please don't twist. I just don't see how this ends well the more entrenched we become. I never thought I'd be a pacifist but the older I get the more I am and I don't trust our government. The stories coming out on Vindman prove how corrupt our is and the support for Ukraine and war with Russia are fraught with fraud.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
America can give a few billions out of an outrageous DOD budget to Ukraine, especially when it's preventing Russia from USSR 2.0 aspirationsRoadTrip said:
I don't understand why you believe an America first position is somehow support for Russia. I asked PGOS the same question and received no response. Please show 1 just 1 staement in more than 50 pages of a SINGLE position of Russian support. You have a worldview which says fight Russia and there is no room for any alternative. There is but it won't stop you from accusing your opposition of sucking Putin's cock. Unbelievable but then again I saw 5 people wearing masks in their cars alone on I-5 this morning.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Russia is 100% intent on the downfall of the US and the system that enabled us to become #1. They've been doing everything they can to aid China in their quest to create a "multipolar" world devoid of a superpower aka The US. They literally state as much.RaceBannon said:
Not aimed at youUW_Doog_Bot said:
Lol never once said anything remotely to this and 100% Zelensky can fuck the fuck off with this shit.RaceBannon said:
I get your argument
Just don't agree
In a vacuum sure fuck Russia
But it's not a vacuum
America first
It's cute people in here think they don't have a problem with Russians. Russians have a problem with us. Reminds me of RIP @CirrhosisDawg trying to apologize for ChYnA. Complete with citing sources being paid and bought for.
Ukraine ain't my friend, but I'll gladly hand them the brass knuckles to go fight the other gang in my neighborhood...even if they get shot for it.
Tldr it serves US interests to watch Russia go down a peg or three on the international stage.
Anywho, @RaceBannon we can disagree. Some retards in here ain't cut out for the higher level realpolitik discussion board.
Additionally, it has the added benefit of showing the world that 80s American tech is better than what Russia can field in 2023 (for the most part).
America has a lot of domestic problems, of which this is a sideshow in comparison to.
It's a win/win situation in many ways for America to supply Ukraine here.
No way they'd press the nuke button as their country is obliterated. No way in hell. Right?
But itSaul Goodman if Zelensky wants to call for tactical use of nuclear weapons.
Putin Bad/Z Man good.
Hth -
No one asks Warren Buffet for his tax returns.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I wanted to finance a house, but when asked to deal with lenders I walked awaypawz said:
Thanks for proving my poont. Much appreciated.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/04/ex-nato-head-says-putin-wanted-to-join-alliance-early-on-in-his-rulepawz said:
Again, this is where your understanding of history fails you.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Ukraine doesn't need to revoke NATO aspirations. Russia could BE in NATO if it wanted to.46XiJCAB said:
Gawd you're fucking thick. In 2022 Russia and Ukraine will working on a settlement that included Russia pulling back and Ukraine renouncing NATO aspirations. Then Boris. But do go on.PostGameOrangeSlices said:46XiJCAB said:PGOS can continue to believe that Ukraine is going to push Russian troops back to Russia. It's a fantasy but nothing anyone poasts here will deter him from believing that. I'll continue to read and listen to people with rational takes on what's happening on the front and the likely outcome.
You are retarded
You are what is called a "useful idiot"
Putin did in fact ask William Jefferson Clinton for Russia to join NATO and was rebuffed.
Considering NATO's charter was to be a defense alliance the former Soviet Union, the joining of NATO by Russia would render the necessity of that charter inherently moot.
Chess, not checkers.
"Vladimir Putin wanted Russia to join Nato but did not want his country to have to go through the usual application process and stand in line “with a lot of countries that don’t matter”, according to a former secretary general of the transatlantic alliance.
George Robertson, a former Labour defence secretary who led Nato between 1999 and 2003, said Putin made it clear at their first meeting that he wanted Russia to be part of western Europe. “They wanted to be part of that secure, stable prosperous west that Russia was out of at the time,” he said."
Either the goal is peace with Russia or it's something else.
So far its something else.
-
Sure.gifPostGameOrangeSlices said:
The Russian military. Not MoscowPurpleThrobber said:
I was told US F22's could wipe Russia off the face of the earth.Goduckies said:
My issue is what is the endgame? And what if Ukraine really starts kicking butt and Putin ratchets it up.... we don't want nukes, even tactical ones. Putin has fought this war without those... let's not provoke him.RoadTrip said:
Thank you for considerate discussion. A few billion is one thing but several hundred and potential troops is quite another. Not saying we're there yet so please don't twist. I just don't see how this ends well the more entrenched we become. I never thought I'd be a pacifist but the older I get the more I am and I don't trust our government. The stories coming out on Vindman prove how corrupt our is and the support for Ukraine and war with Russia are fraught with fraud.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
America can give a few billions out of an outrageous DOD budget to Ukraine, especially when it's preventing Russia from USSR 2.0 aspirationsRoadTrip said:
I don't understand why you believe an America first position is somehow support for Russia. I asked PGOS the same question and received no response. Please show 1 just 1 staement in more than 50 pages of a SINGLE position of Russian support. You have a worldview which says fight Russia and there is no room for any alternative. There is but it won't stop you from accusing your opposition of sucking Putin's cock. Unbelievable but then again I saw 5 people wearing masks in their cars alone on I-5 this morning.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Russia is 100% intent on the downfall of the US and the system that enabled us to become #1. They've been doing everything they can to aid China in their quest to create a "multipolar" world devoid of a superpower aka The US. They literally state as much.RaceBannon said:
Not aimed at youUW_Doog_Bot said:
Lol never once said anything remotely to this and 100% Zelensky can fuck the fuck off with this shit.RaceBannon said:
I get your argument
Just don't agree
In a vacuum sure fuck Russia
But it's not a vacuum
America first
It's cute people in here think they don't have a problem with Russians. Russians have a problem with us. Reminds me of RIP @CirrhosisDawg trying to apologize for ChYnA. Complete with citing sources being paid and bought for.
Ukraine ain't my friend, but I'll gladly hand them the brass knuckles to go fight the other gang in my neighborhood...even if they get shot for it.
Tldr it serves US interests to watch Russia go down a peg or three on the international stage.
Anywho, @RaceBannon we can disagree. Some retards in here ain't cut out for the higher level realpolitik discussion board.
Additionally, it has the added benefit of showing the world that 80s American tech is better than what Russia can field in 2023 (for the most part).
America has a lot of domestic problems, of which this is a sideshow in comparison to.
It's a win/win situation in many ways for America to supply Ukraine here.
No way they'd press the nuke button as their country is obliterated. No way in hell. Right?
But itSaul Goodman if Zelensky wants to call for tactical use of nuclear weapons.
Putin Bad/Z Man good.
Hth
Like the US military industrial complex has restrained itself in lobbing bombs into populated areas. Ka ching! on the reorders.
-
For the record, I think NATO should've bent over backwards to let them inpawz said:
No one asks Warren Buffet for his tax returns.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I wanted to finance a house, but when asked to deal with lenders I walked awaypawz said:
Thanks for proving my poont. Much appreciated.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/04/ex-nato-head-says-putin-wanted-to-join-alliance-early-on-in-his-rulepawz said:
Again, this is where your understanding of history fails you.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Ukraine doesn't need to revoke NATO aspirations. Russia could BE in NATO if it wanted to.46XiJCAB said:
Gawd you're fucking thick. In 2022 Russia and Ukraine will working on a settlement that included Russia pulling back and Ukraine renouncing NATO aspirations. Then Boris. But do go on.PostGameOrangeSlices said:46XiJCAB said:PGOS can continue to believe that Ukraine is going to push Russian troops back to Russia. It's a fantasy but nothing anyone poasts here will deter him from believing that. I'll continue to read and listen to people with rational takes on what's happening on the front and the likely outcome.
You are retarded
You are what is called a "useful idiot"
Putin did in fact ask William Jefferson Clinton for Russia to join NATO and was rebuffed.
Considering NATO's charter was to be a defense alliance the former Soviet Union, the joining of NATO by Russia would render the necessity of that charter inherently moot.
Chess, not checkers.
"Vladimir Putin wanted Russia to join Nato but did not want his country to have to go through the usual application process and stand in line “with a lot of countries that don’t matter”, according to a former secretary general of the transatlantic alliance.
George Robertson, a former Labour defence secretary who led Nato between 1999 and 2003, said Putin made it clear at their first meeting that he wanted Russia to be part of western Europe. “They wanted to be part of that secure, stable prosperous west that Russia was out of at the time,” he said."
Either the goal is peace with Russia or it's something else.
So far its something else.
But at the same time, at some point paperwork has to be filled out. Every other country did it in short order, even Turkey
Despite your best efforts Russia has no one to blame but itself, and if they wanted into NATO theyd be in NATO.
Instead they want to invade their neighbors -
DisagreePostGameOrangeSlices said:
I am pro AmericaRaceBannon said:I'm pro American unlike PGOS so when I engage in whataboutism it's to make a point, not condemn America
The US has a long standing no malarkey rule for the western hemisphere
Grenada, where we called in Clint Eastwood, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Peru, and Chile among others have met the CIA when the Soviets meddle
Cuba was lost and democrats started supporting the Sandinista and Venezuela commies which makes things more difficult
Note that the democrats party has not been outlawed even though they support our enemies
Nobody was easier on the Soviets than Teddy and the gang
It all matters for a long walk to get perspective -
Ka Ching! is the something else.pawz said:
No one asks Warren Buffet for his tax returns.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I wanted to finance a house, but when asked to deal with lenders I walked awaypawz said:
Thanks for proving my poont. Much appreciated.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/04/ex-nato-head-says-putin-wanted-to-join-alliance-early-on-in-his-rulepawz said:
Again, this is where your understanding of history fails you.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Ukraine doesn't need to revoke NATO aspirations. Russia could BE in NATO if it wanted to.46XiJCAB said:
Gawd you're fucking thick. In 2022 Russia and Ukraine will working on a settlement that included Russia pulling back and Ukraine renouncing NATO aspirations. Then Boris. But do go on.PostGameOrangeSlices said:46XiJCAB said:PGOS can continue to believe that Ukraine is going to push Russian troops back to Russia. It's a fantasy but nothing anyone poasts here will deter him from believing that. I'll continue to read and listen to people with rational takes on what's happening on the front and the likely outcome.
You are retarded
You are what is called a "useful idiot"
Putin did in fact ask William Jefferson Clinton for Russia to join NATO and was rebuffed.
Considering NATO's charter was to be a defense alliance the former Soviet Union, the joining of NATO by Russia would render the necessity of that charter inherently moot.
Chess, not checkers.
"Vladimir Putin wanted Russia to join Nato but did not want his country to have to go through the usual application process and stand in line “with a lot of countries that don’t matter”, according to a former secretary general of the transatlantic alliance.
George Robertson, a former Labour defence secretary who led Nato between 1999 and 2003, said Putin made it clear at their first meeting that he wanted Russia to be part of western Europe. “They wanted to be part of that secure, stable prosperous west that Russia was out of at the time,” he said."
Either the goal is peace with Russia or it's something else.
So far its something else.
-
-
Military force to defend America is dangerous and needs to be thought through. It was just 4 Americans kidnapped today anyway.
One of the tells of the global elite is that they are against anything that actually might help America. Useless endless wars are GOOD though
Border wall BAD -
So America hating fuckfact Adam Kinzinger is in the 'do nothing/status quo' camp.RaceBannon said:Military force to defend America is dangerous and needs to be thought through. It was just 4 Americans kidnapped today anyway.
One of the tells of the global elite is that they are against anything that actually might help America. Useless endless wars are GOOD though
Border wall BAD
What's the going shill rate for cartels these days? Could one make a living doing just that?
Fuck the cartels. Any means necessary to throttle their asses.
-
The Governor's office in ArizonaPurpleThrobber said:
So America hating fuckfact Adam Kinzinger is in the 'do nothing/status quo' camp.RaceBannon said:Military force to defend America is dangerous and needs to be thought through. It was just 4 Americans kidnapped today anyway.
One of the tells of the global elite is that they are against anything that actually might help America. Useless endless wars are GOOD though
Border wall BAD
What's the going shill rate for cartels these days? Could one make a living doing just that?
Fuck the cartels. Any means necessary to throttle their asses.
Allegedly -
Paulus wasn’t either at one point.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Bide timeBob_C said:
So why did Ukraine send lots of men there to defend and become encircled and die?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Bakhmut is a city of 70k that Russia has spent 9 months trying to take, and still hasnt fully taken.pawz said:
The city of Bakhmut found this interpretation of the facts charming.PostGameOrangeSlices said:46XiJCAB said:
You need to get off the "making excuses" for Russia stuff. It makes you look fucking stupid. "Putin and Russia are evil." No shit man like none of us here have been around long enough to know that.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The real chickenhawks are the ones bending over backwards to make excuses for RussiaWestlinnDuck said:
As long as it isn't them or their kids. That's the clear moral view of a chickenhawk.PurpleThrobber said:
The chickenhawks don't care who dies.Goduckies said:
Ok they had the lesson now lets negotiate a damn end to this so innocents on both sides stop dying... this song describes it best...PostGameOrangeSlices said:
It doesn't.pawz said:PostGameOrangeSlices said:
How so?pawz said:
Ironic, because this describes you perfectly on this topicPostGameOrangeSlices said:RaceBannon said:
So go ahead and reward the assholes who did it. Are you getting a cut or do you suck cock for free?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
No shit. We agree on Trump.RaceBannon said:
Not under TrumpPostGameOrangeSlices said:
2015 Hillary was grasping at straws. It was fake newsRaceBannon said:
Welcome to 2015 HillaryPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Sad to see so called Americans bend over backwards to defend Russia of all fucking places.SwisherSweetboy said:Weird thread going on here. Even the dimmest of bulbs in America must be seeing that we should not send one more fucking dollar to Ukraine now. Jesus. If it's a whoosh thread, well OK. But this PGOS cunt needs to own up to it.
Get some new material
Russia Russia Russia led to covid covid covid led to Zelensky lighting his country on fire. Allegedly
Maybe you and Vindman can get cocktails
Russia actually invading their neighbors? Another Tuesday in world history
If you weren't such a fucking blockhead you might get a clue
Vindman and his ilk attacked American democracy just like they accused Trump
I support America. Go suck Zelensky dick
It all fake news. Hello?
If you werent such a blockhead, youd understand that sometimes you cant have constant wet dreams about Trump and realize that life goes on
It's all fucking fake.
What is fucking fake about Russia being a constant menance to the world? Explain away that one...
The isnt the first rodeoPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Disagree.Bob_C said:
Many on here think it’s an unwinnable situation as it stands. You think it can be done with an unlimited budget and timeline and that we should be spending money for punitive punishment.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Bob_C said:
Provide a specific example. Sounds like there’s a lot to choose from so should be easy.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
A good number of people in this threadBob_C said:
Who has defended anything that Russia has done?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Sad to see so called Americans bend over backwards to defend Russia of all fucking places.SwisherSweetboy said:Weird thread going on here. Even the dimmest of bulbs in America must be seeing that we should not send one more fucking dollar to Ukraine now. Jesus. If it's a whoosh thread, well OK. But this PGOS cunt needs to own up to it.
Acknowledging the realities of the situation as it stands is not defending anything. You refusing to do that is just fandom, not analysis.
Lots of "Russia had no choice, NATO is expanding" sob stories, without understanding why NATO exists in the first place
Lots of "bio weapon labs" takes to justify the invasion
Lots of "Ukraine is full of Nazis" takes because they have a few groups of paramilitary Neo Nazis like every other country, including Russia
All excuses the Russians themselves use to justfiy invasion and genocide.
No one but a select few buys it
Ive said several times this is peanuts to the US and it doesnt involve US troops
Hope this helps.
Allowing Russia to continue to invade and bully their neighbors will cost FAR more in the long run.
And might actually involve US troops doing the fighting and dying
If we can supply Ukraine with older weapons and let them do the fighting against the Russian horde, why not?
This is what Bot and I have been saying
It sucks this happened, it sucks Biden and the Dems routinely have this shit happening because they dont take hardline stances, everything about it sucks. But the milk is spilled, and Russia is getting a lesson in fuck around and find out.
You are so delusional you called my picture of blown up Russian armour propaganda.
https://youtu.be/LQUXuQ6Zd9w
You know, the country who started this whole mess and has been killing, torturing, and raping civilians. Then deporting the surviving children to re education camps.
This is an evil regime. Chickenhawks think that appeasement is the proper response.
You keep talking about raping, torture, killing of civilians as I talk about getting to the negotiating table and making peace to end it. But I'm the appeaser and Putin cocksucker? WTF is wrong with you?
Ukraine is about to launch a major offensive with new and improved weapons versus what they have been using previously. They are in a position of strength here, and if they want to keep fighting versus appeasing the tyrannical regime that has raped their country, that is their call. I support their right to do that.
You, and other, want to reward the aggressor with concessions and negotiations.
LIFPO.
You knew that, right?
They also aren't encircled -
So is the Ukraine shredding this week or strategically losing?
Hard to keep track -
Check the anecdotal databases.RaceBannon said:So is the Ukraine shredding this week or strategically losing?
Hard to keep track
-
Russia is inching closer to...capturing the 57th biggest city in UkraineRaceBannon said:So is the Ukraine shredding this week or strategically losing?
Hard to keep track -
Battles aren't fought over the population of the citizens, they are fought for strategic geographic positions in order to win the next battle.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Russia is inching closer to...capturing the 57th biggest city in UkraineRaceBannon said:So is the Ukraine shredding this week or strategically losing?
Hard to keep track
@PurpleThrobber doesn't want to take Vantage for the campgrounds.
-
Sure.gifBob_C said:
Battles aren't fought over the population of the citizens, they are fought for strategic geographic positions in order to win the next battle.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Russia is inching closer to...capturing the 57th biggest city in UkraineRaceBannon said:So is the Ukraine shredding this week or strategically losing?
Hard to keep track
@PurpleThrobber doesn't want to take Vantage for the campgrounds.
Nothing strategic about Kyiv, Kherson, Kharkiv
Explain the strategic importance of...bakhmut -
Strategic enough for Zelensky to throw thousands of soldiers there to die. I’ll take his word for it.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Sure.gifBob_C said:
Battles aren't fought over the population of the citizens, they are fought for strategic geographic positions in order to win the next battle.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Russia is inching closer to...capturing the 57th biggest city in UkraineRaceBannon said:So is the Ukraine shredding this week or strategically losing?
Hard to keep track
@PurpleThrobber doesn't want to take Vantage for the campgrounds.
Nothing strategic about Kyiv, Kherson, Kharkiv
Explain the strategic importance of...bakhmut -
I thought it was a strategic defeat?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Sure.gifBob_C said:
Battles aren't fought over the population of the citizens, they are fought for strategic geographic positions in order to win the next battle.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Russia is inching closer to...capturing the 57th biggest city in UkraineRaceBannon said:So is the Ukraine shredding this week or strategically losing?
Hard to keep track
@PurpleThrobber doesn't want to take Vantage for the campgrounds.
Nothing strategic about Kyiv, Kherson, Kharkiv
Explain the strategic importance of...bakhmut
SHREDDED -
They held off Russia for 9 months there.Bob_C said:
Strategic enough for Zelensky to throw thousands of soldiers there to die. I’ll take his word for it.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Sure.gifBob_C said:
Battles aren't fought over the population of the citizens, they are fought for strategic geographic positions in order to win the next battle.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Russia is inching closer to...capturing the 57th biggest city in UkraineRaceBannon said:So is the Ukraine shredding this week or strategically losing?
Hard to keep track
@PurpleThrobber doesn't want to take Vantage for the campgrounds.
Nothing strategic about Kyiv, Kherson, Kharkiv
Explain the strategic importance of...bakhmut
Whether or not they use the opportunity to counter attack soon will make or break that decision -
Zelensky reminds me of Robert E Lee
-
Thanks for making my point. If it didn’t matter they wouldn’t have fought for 9 months.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
They held off Russia for 9 months there.Bob_C said:
Strategic enough for Zelensky to throw thousands of soldiers there to die. I’ll take his word for it.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Sure.gifBob_C said:
Battles aren't fought over the population of the citizens, they are fought for strategic geographic positions in order to win the next battle.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Russia is inching closer to...capturing the 57th biggest city in UkraineRaceBannon said:So is the Ukraine shredding this week or strategically losing?
Hard to keep track
@PurpleThrobber doesn't want to take Vantage for the campgrounds.
Nothing strategic about Kyiv, Kherson, Kharkiv
Explain the strategic importance of...bakhmut
Whether or not they use the opportunity to counter attack soon will make or break that decision -
Though that and boating on the Columbia is a plusBob_C said:
Battles aren't fought over the population of the citizens, they are fought for strategic geographic positions in order to win the next battle.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Russia is inching closer to...capturing the 57th biggest city in UkraineRaceBannon said:So is the Ukraine shredding this week or strategically losing?
Hard to keep track
@PurpleThrobber doesn't want to take Vantage for the campgrounds. -
Why not? Theyve bled the Russians on a scale of 5 to 1 and tied up a lot of Russias best troops thereBob_C said:
Thanks for making my point. If it didn’t matter they wouldn’t have fought for 9 months.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
They held off Russia for 9 months there.Bob_C said:
Strategic enough for Zelensky to throw thousands of soldiers there to die. I’ll take his word for it.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Sure.gifBob_C said:
Battles aren't fought over the population of the citizens, they are fought for strategic geographic positions in order to win the next battle.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Russia is inching closer to...capturing the 57th biggest city in UkraineRaceBannon said:So is the Ukraine shredding this week or strategically losing?
Hard to keep track
@PurpleThrobber doesn't want to take Vantage for the campgrounds.
Nothing strategic about Kyiv, Kherson, Kharkiv
Explain the strategic importance of...bakhmut
Whether or not they use the opportunity to counter attack soon will make or break that decision
They are going to counter attack soon. Lipo -
So when can we expect the Russians to surrender and get this proxy war over?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Why not? Theyve bled the Russians on a scale of 5 to 1 and tied up a lot of Russias best troops thereBob_C said:
Thanks for making my point. If it didn’t matter they wouldn’t have fought for 9 months.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
They held off Russia for 9 months there.Bob_C said:
Strategic enough for Zelensky to throw thousands of soldiers there to die. I’ll take his word for it.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Sure.gifBob_C said:
Battles aren't fought over the population of the citizens, they are fought for strategic geographic positions in order to win the next battle.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Russia is inching closer to...capturing the 57th biggest city in UkraineRaceBannon said:So is the Ukraine shredding this week or strategically losing?
Hard to keep track
@PurpleThrobber doesn't want to take Vantage for the campgrounds.
Nothing strategic about Kyiv, Kherson, Kharkiv
Explain the strategic importance of...bakhmut
Whether or not they use the opportunity to counter attack soon will make or break that decision
They are going to counter attack soon. Lipo -
Hopefully Putin dies and someone comes in and withdraws46XiJCAB said:
So when can we expect the Russians to surrender and get this proxy war over?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Why not? Theyve bled the Russians on a scale of 5 to 1 and tied up a lot of Russias best troops thereBob_C said:
Thanks for making my point. If it didn’t matter they wouldn’t have fought for 9 months.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
They held off Russia for 9 months there.Bob_C said:
Strategic enough for Zelensky to throw thousands of soldiers there to die. I’ll take his word for it.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Sure.gifBob_C said:
Battles aren't fought over the population of the citizens, they are fought for strategic geographic positions in order to win the next battle.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Russia is inching closer to...capturing the 57th biggest city in UkraineRaceBannon said:So is the Ukraine shredding this week or strategically losing?
Hard to keep track
@PurpleThrobber doesn't want to take Vantage for the campgrounds.
Nothing strategic about Kyiv, Kherson, Kharkiv
Explain the strategic importance of...bakhmut
Whether or not they use the opportunity to counter attack soon will make or break that decision
They are going to counter attack soon. Lipo
Who knows -
After Zelensky's charge at Gettysburg46XiJCAB said:
So when can we expect the Russians to surrender and get this proxy war over?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Why not? Theyve bled the Russians on a scale of 5 to 1 and tied up a lot of Russias best troops thereBob_C said:
Thanks for making my point. If it didn’t matter they wouldn’t have fought for 9 months.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
They held off Russia for 9 months there.Bob_C said:
Strategic enough for Zelensky to throw thousands of soldiers there to die. I’ll take his word for it.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Sure.gifBob_C said:
Battles aren't fought over the population of the citizens, they are fought for strategic geographic positions in order to win the next battle.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Russia is inching closer to...capturing the 57th biggest city in UkraineRaceBannon said:So is the Ukraine shredding this week or strategically losing?
Hard to keep track
@PurpleThrobber doesn't want to take Vantage for the campgrounds.
Nothing strategic about Kyiv, Kherson, Kharkiv
Explain the strategic importance of...bakhmut
Whether or not they use the opportunity to counter attack soon will make or break that decision
They are going to counter attack soon. Lipo -
Weird thing to wish forRaceBannon said:
After Zelensky's charge at Gettysburg46XiJCAB said:
So when can we expect the Russians to surrender and get this proxy war over?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Why not? Theyve bled the Russians on a scale of 5 to 1 and tied up a lot of Russias best troops thereBob_C said:
Thanks for making my point. If it didn’t matter they wouldn’t have fought for 9 months.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
They held off Russia for 9 months there.Bob_C said:
Strategic enough for Zelensky to throw thousands of soldiers there to die. I’ll take his word for it.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Sure.gifBob_C said:
Battles aren't fought over the population of the citizens, they are fought for strategic geographic positions in order to win the next battle.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Russia is inching closer to...capturing the 57th biggest city in UkraineRaceBannon said:So is the Ukraine shredding this week or strategically losing?
Hard to keep track
@PurpleThrobber doesn't want to take Vantage for the campgrounds.
Nothing strategic about Kyiv, Kherson, Kharkiv
Explain the strategic importance of...bakhmut
Whether or not they use the opportunity to counter attack soon will make or break that decision
They are going to counter attack soon. Lipo -
Stalingrad 2.0.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
They held off Russia for 9 months there.Bob_C said:
Strategic enough for Zelensky to throw thousands of soldiers there to die. I’ll take his word for it.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Sure.gifBob_C said:
Battles aren't fought over the population of the citizens, they are fought for strategic geographic positions in order to win the next battle.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Russia is inching closer to...capturing the 57th biggest city in UkraineRaceBannon said:So is the Ukraine shredding this week or strategically losing?
Hard to keep track
@PurpleThrobber doesn't want to take Vantage for the campgrounds.
Nothing strategic about Kyiv, Kherson, Kharkiv
Explain the strategic importance of...bakhmut
Whether or not they use the opportunity to counter attack soon will make or break that decision -
Where did I wish for itPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Weird thing to wish forRaceBannon said:
After Zelensky's charge at Gettysburg46XiJCAB said:
So when can we expect the Russians to surrender and get this proxy war over?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Why not? Theyve bled the Russians on a scale of 5 to 1 and tied up a lot of Russias best troops thereBob_C said:
Thanks for making my point. If it didn’t matter they wouldn’t have fought for 9 months.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
They held off Russia for 9 months there.Bob_C said:
Strategic enough for Zelensky to throw thousands of soldiers there to die. I’ll take his word for it.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Sure.gifBob_C said:
Battles aren't fought over the population of the citizens, they are fought for strategic geographic positions in order to win the next battle.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Russia is inching closer to...capturing the 57th biggest city in UkraineRaceBannon said:So is the Ukraine shredding this week or strategically losing?
Hard to keep track
@PurpleThrobber doesn't want to take Vantage for the campgrounds.
Nothing strategic about Kyiv, Kherson, Kharkiv
Explain the strategic importance of...bakhmut
Whether or not they use the opportunity to counter attack soon will make or break that decision
They are going to counter attack soon. Lipo
You're really struggling -
After Putin's Little BighornRaceBannon said:
Where did I wish for itPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Weird thing to wish forRaceBannon said:
After Zelensky's charge at Gettysburg46XiJCAB said:
So when can we expect the Russians to surrender and get this proxy war over?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Why not? Theyve bled the Russians on a scale of 5 to 1 and tied up a lot of Russias best troops thereBob_C said:
Thanks for making my point. If it didn’t matter they wouldn’t have fought for 9 months.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
They held off Russia for 9 months there.Bob_C said:
Strategic enough for Zelensky to throw thousands of soldiers there to die. I’ll take his word for it.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Sure.gifBob_C said:
Battles aren't fought over the population of the citizens, they are fought for strategic geographic positions in order to win the next battle.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Russia is inching closer to...capturing the 57th biggest city in UkraineRaceBannon said:So is the Ukraine shredding this week or strategically losing?
Hard to keep track
@PurpleThrobber doesn't want to take Vantage for the campgrounds.
Nothing strategic about Kyiv, Kherson, Kharkiv
Explain the strategic importance of...bakhmut
Whether or not they use the opportunity to counter attack soon will make or break that decision
They are going to counter attack soon. Lipo
You're really struggling
Hardy har har
