What am I missing here?
You want brutal? You want the truth? Let's take the gloves off. Let's roll.
September 1994
at USC
Ohio State
at Miami
UCLA
all in a row! That's brutal. Not USC (with likely a struggling defense), a solid Utah team and improving Beavlet. And WSU? Please.
Comments
-
And that means we're getting teams with the most roster turnover earlier in the season, and mostly at home.
-
Way too much respect for the Beavs and Utes on this board. It's sad.
-
It’s not a TUFF schedule unless it includes my BRUINS.
MAUL!!!!!1 -
-
Sauté my saucy sexy ball sack puto.pawz said: -
Sure. But did Lambo have to play a ranked Oregon State?DerekJohnson said:I read comments and headlines about UW's "brutal" November schedule. Then I saw it. What's so brutal about that?
You want brutal? You want the truth? Let's take the gloves off. Let's roll.
September 1994
at USC
Ohio State
at Miami
UCLA
all in a row! That's brutal. Not USC (with likely a struggling defense), a solid Utah team and improving Beavlet. And WSU? Please.
-
NarratorDerekJohnson said:I read comments and headlines about UW's "brutal" November schedule. Then I saw it. What's so brutal about that?
You want brutal? You want the truth? Let's take the gloves off. Let's roll.
September 1994
at USC
Ohio State
at Miami
UCLA
all in a row! That's brutal. Not USC (with likely a struggling defense), a solid Utah team and improving Beavlet. And WSU? Please.
After going 3-1 with a loss to USC and curb stompings of Miami and UCLA, Lambo would invent football at Oregon
Lambo should have been fired before the gas pumper made the end zone -
No, but Oregon State, which went 2-6 in conference, beat UCLA 23-14. @coronabruindnc said:
Sure. But did Lambo have to play a ranked Oregon State?DerekJohnson said:I read comments and headlines about UW's "brutal" November schedule. Then I saw it. What's so brutal about that?
You want brutal? You want the truth? Let's take the gloves off. Let's roll.
September 1994
at USC
Ohio State
at Miami
UCLA
all in a row! That's brutal. Not USC (with likely a struggling defense), a solid Utah team and improving Beavlet. And WSU? Please. -
Reaching @AOG territory. Be better.coronabruin said:
Sauté my saucy sexy ball sack puto.pawz said:
-
Yeah but we had more STEM majorsDerekJohnson said:
No, but Oregon State, which went 2-6 in conference, beat UCLA 23-14. @coronabruindnc said:
Sure. But did Lambo have to play a ranked Oregon State?DerekJohnson said:I read comments and headlines about UW's "brutal" November schedule. Then I saw it. What's so brutal about that?
You want brutal? You want the truth? Let's take the gloves off. Let's roll.
September 1994
at USC
Ohio State
at Miami
UCLA
all in a row! That's brutal. Not USC (with likely a struggling defense), a solid Utah team and improving Beavlet. And WSU? Please. -
GFYpawz said:
Reaching @AOG territory. Be better.coronabruin said:
Sauté my saucy sexy ball sack puto.pawz said: -
EXACTLY. AOG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corona dipshitcoronabruin said:
GFYpawz said:
Reaching @AOG territory. Be better.coronabruin said:
Sauté my saucy sexy ball sack puto.pawz said: -
Imagine a world where Oregon State and Washington state are considered two tough games in November
-
Back in the day, teams played real schedules.
-
HuskyJW said:
Imagine a world where Oregon State and Washington state are considered two tough games in November
-
dnc said:
Sure. But did Lambo have to play a ranked Oregon State?DerekJohnson said:I read comments and headlines about UW's "brutal" November schedule. Then I saw it. What's so brutal about that?
You want brutal? You want the truth? Let's take the gloves off. Let's roll.
September 1994
at USC
Ohio State
at Miami
UCLA
all in a row! That's brutal. Not USC (with likely a struggling defense), a solid Utah team and improving Beavlet. And WSU? Please.
-
I’m not going to gum up derek’s classy ass thread by addressing this childish tripe, but congrats on adding this retard to your team @pawzEwaDawg said:
EXACTLY. AOG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Corona dipshitcoronabruin said:
GFYpawz said:
Reaching @AOG territory. Be better.coronabruin said:
Sauté my saucy sexy ball sack puto.pawz said: -
-
I just want a win in the desert (ILTCIT)
-
If you're a REAL playoff team, that's about as good of a schedule you can ask for.
First 5 games include a gritty team used to winning (a winnable challenge w/high upside of being top25 win), aP5 road contest against mid tier opponent, you get lowly Cal and zona on the road before bye heading into Oregon that should be hosted by GameDay with both teams 5-0.
You then have 2 gimme(in theory) games of ASU and @stanford to keep it rolling (or rebound if you lose Oregon game).
That sets up the crown Jewel @SC
Handle business against the final 3 that are good but out talented and you're on your way. -
Yep. Id much rather a tough stretch later in the year instead of in September where you might still be ironing out some positions and getting your reads downDoogles said:If you're a REAL playoff team, that's about as good of a schedule you can ask for.
First 5 games include a gritty team used to winning (a winnable challenge w/high upside of being top25 win), aP5 road contest against mid tier opponent, you get lowly Cal and zona on the road before bye heading into Oregon that should be hosted by GameDay with both teams 5-0.
You then have 2 gimme(in theory) games of ASU and @stanford to keep it rolling (or rebound if you lose Oregon game).
That sets up the crown Jewel @SC
Handle business against the final 3 that are good but out talented and you're on your way. -
Right. Feels like the PAC did us and Oregon a favor. Each have a BYE going into the game. Winner of that game is in pole position. SC plays UW then Oregon 11/4 and 11/11. SC is fucked. Finally. 100 years later.Doogles said:If you're a REAL playoff team, that's about as good of a schedule you can ask for.
First 5 games include a gritty team used to winning (a winnable challenge w/high upside of being top25 win), aP5 road contest against mid tier opponent, you get lowly Cal and zona on the road before bye heading into Oregon that should be hosted by GameDay with both teams 5-0.
You then have 2 gimme(in theory) games of ASU and @stanford to keep it rolling (or rebound if you lose Oregon game).
That sets up the crown Jewel @SC
Handle business against the final 3 that are good but out talented and you're on your way. -
I think the guys who are railing about the tuff schedule are thinking about SEC scheduling. You know, very carefully crafted scheduling of powder puff, mediocre, mediocre, powder puff, potentially skrong, powder puff, mediocre, mediocre, skrong, etc. etc. Oh, and most games at home and never leave the southeastern US, especially for "neutral site" OOC games.
-
Doogles said:
If you're a REAL playoff team, that's about as good of a schedule you can ask for.
First 5 games include a gritty team used to winning (a winnable challenge w/high upside of being top25 win), aP5 road contest against mid tier opponent, you get lowly Cal and zona on the road before bye heading into Oregon that should be hosted by GameDay with both teams 5-0.
You then have 2 gimme(in theory) games of ASU and @stanford to keep it rolling (or rebound if you lose Oregon game).
That sets up the crown Jewel @SC
Handle business against the final 3 that are good but out talented and you're on your way.
-
You aren't missing anything. The 'brutal' line of thinking is glass half empty. Lotta people seem to be in on the CFP-or-bust train. If that's the case, having the last four games be high profile (potentially 3 ranked teams and a rivalry opponent) is about the best you could ask for. It also provides plenty of opportunity for Penix to make his case for at least an invite to the Heisman ceremony, and critical home games plus a road game in southern California in the leadup to the early signing period, which could be a nice recruiting benefit if the team handles its business.DerekJohnson said:I read comments and headlines about UW's "brutal" November schedule. Then I saw it. What's so brutal about that?
You want brutal? You want the truth? Let's take the gloves off. Let's roll.
September 1994
at USC
Ohio State
at Miami
UCLA
all in a row! That's brutal. Not USC (with likely a struggling defense), a solid Utah team and improving Beavlet. And WSU? Please. -
If Big Penix Energy stays healthy this sched ain't bad and Dawgs should be in the Conf Champ gm no problem
-
Sounds like jealousy from ACC little brother to me.creepycoug said:I think the guys who are railing about the tuff schedule are thinking about SEC scheduling. You know, very carefully crafted scheduling of powder puff, mediocre, mediocre, powder puff, potentially skrong, powder puff, mediocre, mediocre, skrong, etc. etc. Oh, and most games at home and never leave the southeastern US, especially for "neutral site" OOC games.
-
Doogles said:
If you're a REAL playoff team, that's about as good of a schedule you can ask for.
Beat Oregon like a rented mule, win conference, win a NY6...Playoffs would be fantastic, but it isn't my expectation unless our defense improves alot
-
Beat Oregon like a rented mule, win conference, win a NY6...Playoffs would be fantastic, but it isn't my expectation unless our defense improves alot
-
BleachedAnusDawg said:
Way too much respect for the Beavs and Utes on this board. It's sad.
Buttes, as I like to call them.
