Julien Simon, 4* 2021 ATH, Tacoma (Lincoln), WA (Offered 6/22)
Comments
-
Ethan, like u$c, hate Bo as well.Woof said:Helton is still there, so why is Ethan interested now?
-
-
Bags cover over a multitude of sinsWoof said:Helton is still there, so why is Ethan interested now?
-
Julien Simon reads this bored? Hi, Julian, or USC coaches who take screenshots 👋
-
Interesting he wanted to play WRRatherBeBrewing said:Julien Simon reads this bored? Hi, Julian, or USC coaches who take screenshots 👋
-
BobWoof said:Helton is still there, so why is Ethan interested now?
-
At least he's self aware.RatherBeBrewing said:Julien Simon reads this bored? Hi, Julian, or USC coaches who take screenshots 👋
-
-
-
The Official, Official offer.dnc said: -
There is a wonderful ambiguity in the statement that allows either "side" to nod their headdnc said: -
Everywhere is the Tug these days, shame... as a "that" sider, I can tell you it will merit no nods from we snowflakes. Link for context:RaceBannon said:
There is a wonderful ambiguity in the statement that allows either "side" to nod their headdnc said:
https://www.startribune.com/police-umbrella-man-was-a-white-supremacist-trying-to-incite-floyd-rioting/571932272/ -
I thought that same thing. "What's he trying to say?"RaceBannon said:
There is a wonderful ambiguity in the statement that allows either "side" to nod their headdnc said: -
Just fag talk. He doesn't even know what he's trying to say. I usually don't like opinions from athletes, but I definitely don't from 17 year old ones.1to392831weretaken said:
I thought that same thing. "What's he trying to say?"RaceBannon said:
There is a wonderful ambiguity in the statement that allows either "side" to nod their headdnc said: -
What about 47 year olds?rustysavage said:
Just fag talk. He doesn't even know what he's trying to say. I usually don't like opinions from athletes, but I definitely don't from 17 year old ones.1to392831weretaken said:
I thought that same thing. "What's he trying to say?"RaceBannon said:
There is a wonderful ambiguity in the statement that allows either "side" to nod their headdnc said: -
RaceBannon said:
There is a wonderful ambiguity in the statement that allows either "side" to nod their headdnc said:
-
-
Yikes. Mark this one down in the category of sometimes the recruiting rankings don't mean shit.
-
The majority of the board was dialed in on this one.WoolleyDoog said:Yikes. Mark this one down in the category of sometimes the recruiting rankings don't mean shit.
-
Top 150-ish nationally four-star prospect per 247 Sports and yet couldn't get on the field for USC's absolute shit defense.
LOL at 247's grade inflation for FSP/Heir
-
AtomicDawg said:
The majority of the board was dialed in on this one.WoolleyDoog said:Yikes. Mark this one down in the category of sometimes the recruiting rankings don't mean shit.
Geevis_and_Butthead said:Top 150-ish nationally four-star prospect per 247 Sports and yet couldn't get on the field for USC's absolute shit defense.
LOL at 247's grade inflation for FSP/Heir
Yes, mark this one down as a the board being right. Also shows might point that some schools with take guys rated four star on 247 just for the ratings bump and buzz. -
At some point 24/7 is going to have to adjust how they view Washington state kids. Evaluating a kid and being 50/50 on your 4 and 5* players panning out seems like a poor long term business model. I feel there should be maybe 10 5* kids a year and another 50 legit 4* kids. The rest are varied assortments if 3*. Also, bring back the 2* as an actual evaluation. Making someone 3* because they take up the 25th spot in a class is stupid. If a kids a reach then call it.
-
Recruiting rankings should reflect what type of expected impact a kid should have in the first year or two at a program.theknowledge said:At some point 24/7 is going to have to adjust how they view Washington state kids. Evaluating a kid and being 50/50 on your 4 and 5* players panning out seems like a poor long term business model. I feel there should be maybe 10 5* kids a year and another 50 legit 4* kids. The rest are varied assortments if 3*. Also, bring back the 2* as an actual evaluation. Making someone 3* because they take up the 25th spot in a class is stupid. If a kids a reach then call it.
Right now, they're attempting to project NFL draft status, but that's stupid since that's more dependent on coaching and training. It doesn't make sense for 99% of people who follow recruiting.
Too bad the whole recruiting industry is drunk on star chinflation and hyping up 1000 kids a year -
Checked to see the QB in front of Huard in his class and it was Quinn Ewers with the highest rank ever. He was given a perfect 1.000
Now he's 0-1 vs. UW. -
Huard 1 Ewers 0Doogles said:Checked to see the QB in front of Huard in his class and it was Quinn Ewers with the highest rank ever. He was given a perfect 1.000
Now he's 0-1 vs. UW. -
Wasn't Caleb Williams ahead of Huard? And then Ewers became the #1 when he reclassified?Doogles said:Checked to see the QB in front of Huard in his class and it was Quinn Ewers with the highest rank ever. He was given a perfect 1.000
Now he's 0-1 vs. UW. -
I'm pretty sure Ty Thompson was ranked ahead of him in the end, at least on one if the servicesDoogerMcFarland said:
Wasn't Caleb Williams ahead of Huard? And then Ewers became the #1 when he reclassified?Doogles said:Checked to see the QB in front of Huard in his class and it was Quinn Ewers with the highest rank ever. He was given a perfect 1.000
Now he's 0-1 vs. UW. -
I think the NFL Draft status thing is a cop out to rationalize bad evaluations. How could Sam Huard be a high 5 star based on Draft projection coming out.whatshouldicareabout said:
Recruiting rankings should reflect what type of expected impact a kid should have in the first year or two at a program.theknowledge said:At some point 24/7 is going to have to adjust how they view Washington state kids. Evaluating a kid and being 50/50 on your 4 and 5* players panning out seems like a poor long term business model. I feel there should be maybe 10 5* kids a year and another 50 legit 4* kids. The rest are varied assortments if 3*. Also, bring back the 2* as an actual evaluation. Making someone 3* because they take up the 25th spot in a class is stupid. If a kids a reach then call it.
Right now, they're attempting to project NFL draft status, but that's stupid since that's more dependent on coaching and training. It doesn't make sense for 99% of people who follow recruiting.
Too bad the whole recruiting industry is drunk on star chinflation and hyping up 1000 kids a year
There's some obvious flaws in their system that are pretty blatant.
-Kids who pop really early in their high school careers or have one good camp, and get put into the system and then it's hard for 247 to shit on a kid and drop him too far. I feel like there are always 1-3 guys like this in WA each year.
-Kids who are in with groups like FSP.
-There's too many four stars. Too many kids who are four stars who it's clear only like one legit program wants.
-Kids who aren't in certain cities/areas not getting enough of a high rating - Jake Locker not being a 5* Rapp, Otton and Trey Adams being lower rated seem like fits too -
And then there was Top 5 NFL pick James Atoe who somehow was not a 5*
-
The top 10 from that class has had...DoogerMcFarland said:
Wasn't Caleb Williams ahead of Huard? And then Ewers became the #1 when he reclassified?Doogles said:Checked to see the QB in front of Huard in his class and it was Quinn Ewers with the highest rank ever. He was given a perfect 1.000
Now he's 0-1 vs. UW.
-3 hits: Caleb Williams, JJ McCarthy, Drake Maye
-2 meh: Quinn Ewers, Jaxson Dart
-5 ??? who haven't earned real playing time: Huard, Vandagriff (UGA), McCord (OSU), Thompson (UO), Garcia (MIA)
