DeBoer has raised the bar at Washington
Comments
-
Thanks, Taft!
-
Kalen has raised the DeBoer at Washington.
-
I’m just excited for the days when we? all come full circle and hate him again. Can we? get a pole going to see when that happens?
-
Your new pole is as good as mineJECAR said:I’m just excited for the days when we? all come full circle and hate him again. Can we? get a pole going to see when that happens?
-
When the day comes. Pay that man
-
You've embarrassed yourself enough with your takes on his pay.Clevdawg said:When the day comes. Pay that man
If UW has another top 10 season he is going to get a raise to somewhere around 6 million. His closest assistant is making 2 million, top 3 in the country. Did you see our offensive booth at the Alamo Bowl? There are like 15 guys on our staff in support roles just in the fucking booth.
Money is not going to be an issue. If DeBoer was going to leverage UW into going somewhere else, he would've left for Nebraska this year.
The only scenario that scares me is Harbaugh going to the NFL, and Michigan offering DeBoer something like 10 million a year.
Even then I bet UW would match and he'd only leave if he wanted to go back to the frozen hellscape of the midwest
Edit: Ryan Day getting shit canned or leaving would also worry me a bit -
When the UW head football coach makes more than Oregon State and Minnesota gophers I might listen to you.
-
Our coach is in his second year at the P5 level, and before that he had 2 years at G5.Clevdawg said:When the UW head football coach makes more than Oregon State and Minnesota gophers I might listen to you.
What, should we have given him a Mel Tucker contract in year one?
fuck off -
The difference between Deboner and Lake is night and day………ISAFNRC
-
UW football is a business. They just got 11-2 out of a former Mtn West HC on the cheap, and gave him an appropriate salary bump without getting retarded.Clevdawg said:When the UW head football coach makes more than Oregon State and Minnesota gophers I might listen to you.
I'm no business major, but it seems like good business to me.
You seem to prefer the overpay route which keeps proving it's no guarantee of anything. I just want good decisions that result in wins. I'm right and getting what I want. You're not.
Maybe time to reevaluate and introduce some nuance into your take or just give up on it. -
He is fixated on programs overpaying for coaches, is his problem. What the fuck is Fleck doing to deserve the money he makes? Beating a down Wisconsin a few times?chuck said:
UW football is a business. They just got 11-2 out of a former Mtn West HC on the cheap, and gave him an appropriate salary bump without getting retarded.Clevdawg said:When the UW head football coach makes more than Oregon State and Minnesota gophers I might listen to you.
I'm no business major, but it seems like good business to me.
You seem to prefer the overpay route which keeps proving it's no guarantee of anything. I just want good decisions that result in wins. I'm right and getting what I want. You're not.
Maybe time to reevaluate and introduce some nuance into your take or just give up on it. -
Jesus Christ.Clevdawg said:When the UW head football coach makes more than Oregon State and Minnesota gophers I might listen to you.
-
You’re giving the leopard jacket a lot of credit for business acumen right now.Clevdawg said:When the UW head football coach makes more than Oregon State and Minnesota gophers I might listen to you.
-
The Washington job given the revenue generated should pay at a top 20 level. Why? the athletic department revenue is top 20 in the country. And at times top 10. When Oregon State makes a larger financial commitment to their head football coach than the UW. It demonstrates the UW’s priorities. I want UW to prioritize the football program. More to the point, if you’re capable of reading. Which by all accounts you might be to aid your understanding of correlation coefficient between coaching salaries, athletic department revenue and winning percentage.
Grab a cocktail and enjoy the article
Journal of Applied Business and Economics Vol. 22(1) 2020 -
Haven’t coaches figured out that Nebraska is a shitty job yet? I think they have and doubt Deboner is dumb enough to take that jerb.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
You've embarrassed yourself enough with your takes on his pay.Clevdawg said:When the day comes. Pay that man
If UW has another top 10 season he is going to get a raise to somewhere around 6 million. His closest assistant is making 2 million, top 3 in the country. Did you see our offensive booth at the Alamo Bowl? There are like 15 guys on our staff in support roles just in the fucking booth.
Money is not going to be an issue. If DeBoer was going to leverage UW into going somewhere else, he would've left for Nebraska this year.
The only scenario that scares me is Harbaugh going to the NFL, and Michigan offering DeBoer something like 10 million a year.
Even then I bet UW would match and he'd only leave if he wanted to go back to the frozen hellscape of the midwest
Edit: Ryan Day getting shit canned or leaving would also worry me a bit -
BennyBeaver said:
Haven’t coaches figured out that Nebraska is a shitty job yet? I think they have and doubt Deboner is dumb enough to take that jerb.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
You've embarrassed yourself enough with your takes on his pay.Clevdawg said:When the day comes. Pay that man
If UW has another top 10 season he is going to get a raise to somewhere around 6 million. His closest assistant is making 2 million, top 3 in the country. Did you see our offensive booth at the Alamo Bowl? There are like 15 guys on our staff in support roles just in the fucking booth.
Money is not going to be an issue. If DeBoer was going to leverage UW into going somewhere else, he would've left for Nebraska this year.
The only scenario that scares me is Harbaugh going to the NFL, and Michigan offering DeBoer something like 10 million a year.
Even then I bet UW would match and he'd only leave if he wanted to go back to the frozen hellscape of the midwest
Edit: Ryan Day getting shit canned or leaving would also worry me a bit
Nebraska is fine. Pelini is the definition of mediocre and had them at 9 wins every year.
IDK why they hired Mike Riley, that was dumb and not surprising he had no success.
Frost was an excellent hire at the time it was made, but didn't work out and apparently was Sark 2.0 there with boozing and womenizing.
I fully expect Rhule to have them winning the B1G West most every year. -
You really shouldn't make snarky comments about anybody's ability to read with writing like that. I'm sure you can do better, but man that's bad.Clevdawg said:The Washington job given the revenue generated should pay at a top 20 level. Why? the athletic department revenue is top 20 in the country. And at times top 10. When Oregon State makes a larger financial commitment to their head football coach than the UW. It demonstrates the UW’s priorities. I want UW to prioritize the football program. More to the point, if you’re capable of reading. Which by all accounts you might be to aid your understanding of correlation coefficient between coaching salaries, athletic department revenue and winning percentage.
Grab a cocktail and enjoy the article
Journal of Applied Business and Economics Vol. 22(1) 2020
What OSU paying smith more than UW pays Deboer tells me is that they're getting less for their money by a lot. They're thrilled with 9 wins and occasionally beating Oregon and are overpaying for it.
You're applying history, which is fine, but being and presumptuous about UWs priorities and trying to shoe horn this coach salary example in at a really illogical time. Things seem to be changing.
Deboer exceeded expectations and got a bump. If he progresses next year he'll get another. If he succeeds like all of us currently dooging think, he'll be among the top salaried coaches in the country before long.
Would it be more in line with your business acumen if UW was paying Matt Campbell 7.5 million to be about as good as Jonathon Smith at best?
You're criticizing UW for making a stellar hire from a lower level and getting good value for at least two years. Why would they have paid him more than he was willing to accept and more than the market dictates for someone with his credentials? It's a weird idea. -
He also flat out ignores facts like Grubb's salary, the amount of staff we have in support roles, and the NIL money we are throwing around.chuck said:
You really shouldn't make snarky comments about anybody's ability to read with writing like that. I'm sure you can do better, but man that's bad.Clevdawg said:The Washington job given the revenue generated should pay at a top 20 level. Why? the athletic department revenue is top 20 in the country. And at times top 10. When Oregon State makes a larger financial commitment to their head football coach than the UW. It demonstrates the UW’s priorities. I want UW to prioritize the football program. More to the point, if you’re capable of reading. Which by all accounts you might be to aid your understanding of correlation coefficient between coaching salaries, athletic department revenue and winning percentage.
Grab a cocktail and enjoy the article
Journal of Applied Business and Economics Vol. 22(1) 2020
What OSU paying smith more than UW pays Deboer tells me is that they're getting less for their money by a lot. They're thrilled with 9 wins and occasionally beating Oregon and are overpaying for it.
You're applying history, which is fine, but being and presumptuous about UWs priorities and trying to shoe horn this coach salary example in at a really illogical time. Deboer exceeded expectations and got a bump. If he progresses next year he'll get another. If he succeeds like all of us currently dooging think, he'll be among the top salaried coaches in the country before long.
Would it be more in line with your business acumen if UW was paying Matt Campbell 7.5 million to be about as good as Jonathon Smith at best?
You're criticizing UW for making a stellar hire from a lower level and getting good value for at least two years. Why would they have paid him more than he was willing to accept and more than the market dictates for someone with his credentials? It's a weird idea. -
Kinda feeling like a troll job, to be honest. I think it's time to disengage.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
He also flat out ignores facts like Grubb's salary, the amount of staff we have in support roles, and the NIL money we are throwing around.chuck said:
You really shouldn't make snarky comments about anybody's ability to read with writing like that. I'm sure you can do better, but man that's bad.Clevdawg said:The Washington job given the revenue generated should pay at a top 20 level. Why? the athletic department revenue is top 20 in the country. And at times top 10. When Oregon State makes a larger financial commitment to their head football coach than the UW. It demonstrates the UW’s priorities. I want UW to prioritize the football program. More to the point, if you’re capable of reading. Which by all accounts you might be to aid your understanding of correlation coefficient between coaching salaries, athletic department revenue and winning percentage.
Grab a cocktail and enjoy the article
Journal of Applied Business and Economics Vol. 22(1) 2020
What OSU paying smith more than UW pays Deboer tells me is that they're getting less for their money by a lot. They're thrilled with 9 wins and occasionally beating Oregon and are overpaying for it.
You're applying history, which is fine, but being and presumptuous about UWs priorities and trying to shoe horn this coach salary example in at a really illogical time. Deboer exceeded expectations and got a bump. If he progresses next year he'll get another. If he succeeds like all of us currently dooging think, he'll be among the top salaried coaches in the country before long.
Would it be more in line with your business acumen if UW was paying Matt Campbell 7.5 million to be about as good as Jonathon Smith at best?
You're criticizing UW for making a stellar hire from a lower level and getting good value for at least two years. Why would they have paid him more than he was willing to accept and more than the market dictates for someone with his credentials? It's a weird idea. -
If you’re racist and you know it clap your handsFireCohen said:
The difference between Deboner and Lake is night and day………ISAFNRC
-
Title of the thread should be "Deboer brings Washington back to the bar"
-
https://coloradobuffaloeswire.usatoday.com/lists/updated-pac-12-head-coach-salaries-deion-sanders-ranks-football/
DeBoer is between 4.5 an 5 million with most of the pac 12 coaches
Makes more than Smith
Not sure what the issue is -
coloradobuffalowire.usatoday.com is your source?
Smiff $4.85m in 2023.
Smith’s guaranteed salary will start at $4.85 million next season and grow to $5.45 million by 2028, the school said. Oregon State also is adding $100,000 to its salary pool for assistant coaches (rising to $4.85 million) and support staff (rising to $2.5 million).
https://www.opb.org/article/2022/12/11/oregon-state-football-gives-jonathan-smith-new-6-year-30-million-contract/ -
Yeah I really don't read your guys stuff
Imagine paying a career loser that much money
DeBoer will pass him rather easily -
There’s almost nothing to add, except neither one of you called him a dumbfuck so I’ll help out there.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
He also flat out ignores facts like Grubb's salary, the amount of staff we have in support roles, and the NIL money we are throwing around.chuck said:
You really shouldn't make snarky comments about anybody's ability to read with writing like that. I'm sure you can do better, but man that's bad.Clevdawg said:The Washington job given the revenue generated should pay at a top 20 level. Why? the athletic department revenue is top 20 in the country. And at times top 10. When Oregon State makes a larger financial commitment to their head football coach than the UW. It demonstrates the UW’s priorities. I want UW to prioritize the football program. More to the point, if you’re capable of reading. Which by all accounts you might be to aid your understanding of correlation coefficient between coaching salaries, athletic department revenue and winning percentage.
Grab a cocktail and enjoy the article
Journal of Applied Business and Economics Vol. 22(1) 2020
What OSU paying smith more than UW pays Deboer tells me is that they're getting less for their money by a lot. They're thrilled with 9 wins and occasionally beating Oregon and are overpaying for it.
You're applying history, which is fine, but being and presumptuous about UWs priorities and trying to shoe horn this coach salary example in at a really illogical time. Deboer exceeded expectations and got a bump. If he progresses next year he'll get another. If he succeeds like all of us currently dooging think, he'll be among the top salaried coaches in the country before long.
Would it be more in line with your business acumen if UW was paying Matt Campbell 7.5 million to be about as good as Jonathon Smith at best?
You're criticizing UW for making a stellar hire from a lower level and getting good value for at least two years. Why would they have paid him more than he was willing to accept and more than the market dictates for someone with his credentials? It's a weird idea. -
you all really think UW administration would match a $10M/year offer?
Based on what exactly? Besides Dooging i mean.
-
for Mel Tucker or Urban Meyer? Hell nogmo said:you all really think UW administration would match a $10M/year offer?
Based on what exactly? Besides Dooging i mean.
For a proven winner and high character man like DeBoer? Absolutely -
That’s the entire point. The UW can afford 10 million and won’t do it…………….As a percentage of Athletic Department revenue we won’t do it. Jesus, Oregon State Head football coach has no business being close in total compensation to a UW Head coach yet there he is. Why? the disparity in athletic department revenue that’s generated. Btw … A half a stick raise for an assistant for UW and the fans go nuts…. That’s short money. Let’s talk NIL ? Dewand Jones Buckeye offensive tackle makes more than Penix. In fact the top 2 Buckeyes make more than the entire UW football team on NIL. UW is not serious about football. They are kinda of serious. Below is the link to chew on NIL. Even when Peterson got his big contract he was 19th highest paid coach in the country. But top on PAC-12.. Still not elite… Hey if any fan of the program thinks we will be Top 10 in the country for NIL and for coaches be my guest. UW brings in more money than Clemson. We really do..
Athletic Revenue
https://www.pennlive.com/pennstatefootball/2021/06/where-does-your-school-rank-among-richest-and-poorest-power-5-college-football-programs-new-revenue-figures-for-all-65.html?outputType=amp
NIL link
https://www.on3.com/nil/rankings/
-
you realize those are on3 valuations right? NIL deals aren't public information.Clevdawg said:That’s the entire point. The UW can afford 10 million and won’t do it…………….As a percentage of Athletic Department revenue we won’t do it. Jesus, Oregon State Head football coach has no business being close in total compensation to a UW Head coach yet there he is. Why? the disparity in athletic department revenue that’s generated. Btw … A half a stick raise for an assistant for UW and the fans go nuts…. That’s short money. Let’s talk NIL ? Dewand Jones Buckeye offensive tackle makes more than Penix. In fact the top 2 Buckeyes make more than the entire UW football team on NIL. UW is not serious about football. They are kinda of serious. Below is the link to chew on NIL. Even when Peterson got his big contract he was 19th highest paid coach in the country. But top on PAC-12.. Still not elite… Hey if any fan of the program thinks we will be Top 10 in the country for NIL and for coaches be my guest. UW brings in more money than Clemson. We really do..
Athletic Revenue
https://www.pennlive.com/pennstatefootball/2021/06/where-does-your-school-rank-among-richest-and-poorest-power-5-college-football-programs-new-revenue-figures-for-all-65.html?outputType=amp
NIL link
https://www.on3.com/nil/rankings/ -
Context matters, for Christ sake. Lot of hand wringing over money when the coach agreed to an extension 2 weeks ago. He’s fine with the pay, as is Grubb, as is the rest of the coaching staff. Maybe you should be too? But, good to know we have all the money we need if anyone comes poaching. Maybe we should save it for that rainy day vs. throwing money for the fuck of it which you keep suggesting is the elusive key to success?Clevdawg said:That’s the entire point. The UW can afford 10 million and won’t do it…………….As a percentage of Athletic Department revenue we won’t do it. Jesus, Oregon State Head football coach has no business being close in total compensation to a UW Head coach yet there he is. Why? the disparity in athletic department revenue that’s generated. Btw … A half a stick raise for an assistant for UW and the fans go nuts…. That’s short money. Let’s talk NIL ? Dewand Jones Buckeye offensive tackle makes more than Penix. In fact the top 2 Buckeyes make more than the entire UW football team on NIL. UW is not serious about football. They are kinda of serious. Below is the link to chew on NIL. Even when Peterson got his big contract he was 19th highest paid coach in the country. But top on PAC-12.. Still not elite… Hey if any fan of the program thinks we will be Top 10 in the country for NIL and for coaches be my guest. UW brings in more money than Clemson. We really do..
Athletic Revenue
https://www.pennlive.com/pennstatefootball/2021/06/where-does-your-school-rank-among-richest-and-poorest-power-5-college-football-programs-new-revenue-figures-for-all-65.html?outputType=amp
NIL link
https://www.on3.com/nil/rankings/
Are our guys transferring to Ohio State and I missed it? Or do you want to go the A&M route and pay 17 year old retards before they’ve even shown up on campus? I’m guessing yes based on your dumb as fuck takes so far.
