Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
We need a general tweet of the day thread
Comments
-
-
You guys, doxxing is like, totally rong, ok guys?

-
She sounds like a college freshman.hardhat said:You guys, doxxing is like, totally rong, ok guys?

-
Fuck You, Taylor Lorenz, you fucking hypocrite POS.Fire_Marshall_Bill said: -
It''s official in Georgia. Real blacks are less capable of getting a state ID and that the voter ID laws are not intended to provide for secure and honest elections but to disenfranchise blacks.
https://jeffgoldstein.substack.com/p/the-noxious-racism-of-disparate-impact?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Requiring an ID to vote is objectively racist, the North Carolina Supreme Court has ruled — overriding the NC legislature and the state constitution, which shockingly treated all potential NC voters as equal before the law.
What this means, by assessment of the State Supreme Court, (which ruled 4-3 along ideological lines, with liberal justices in the majority), is that blacks are now officially and legally deemed less capable in practice of acquiring a form of personal identification. That is, they are lesser than all other “races” with respect to that task. And so it follows, they are lesser with respect to the constellation of other tasks that require personal identification to effectively complete.
This ruling, then, suggests that the inability to acquire personal identification by blacks, who the Court ruled would be “disparately impacted” by securing the trustworthiness of elections, in this instance, is an essential part of blackness as a legal identity marker. Individual blacks who are able to secure an ID to, eg., vote, to rent a home, to rent a car or a hotel room, to buy alcohol, to purchase legal firearms, et al., are therefore racial outliers, per this ruling, and can’t be said to be authentically black, in particular when it comes to their relationship to voter ID laws. Voting laws requiring ID come not from wanting to secure elections, the Court was able to suss from an insidiously colorblind piece of legislation; rather, such laws embody the “racial animus” of GOP lawmakers toward a specific and singular racial identity group. Thus, the individualism of blacks in North Carolina is — according to the logic of the State Supreme Court’s liberal justices — necessarily subsumed by that group’s peculiar inability, as a function of their skin color (itself determined by genetics), to perform basic civic tasks as a prerequisite for voting. They are uniquely incapable as a race of identifying themselves as themselves in a way that is physically verifiable. -
-
-
everyone.gif ?LebamDawg said: -
Final results. If I recall correctly he has been searching for a CEO. I do wonder if this was a way to kill two birds with one stone. Out more bots and open the runway for whomever he’s selected to take over as CEO.






