Kari Lake tweet this morning

TurdBomber said:

MelloDawg said:

TurdBomber said:

AOG said:

TurdBomber said:

Regardless of party, mail in voting and especially vote harvesting invite malarky and shenanigans by breaking the chain of custody and having no means of verifying a ballot was properly filled out by the person's name it bears. No ID, no precinct, signature verification is a joke, so it's mostly based on good faith, which the party who pushed Russian Collusion for 4 years is not entitled to.

If elections aren't secure, there's no way to validate them, and the party in power doesn't indict or investigate itself, so by the time Election Day rolls around, it's too late to challenge without a boatload of cash, volunteers, and a court willing to allow audits, which few are, because it's much easier to throw the problems back into the lap of the legislature and say, "you wanted this, you got it."

Speculation... the facts are that multiple studies have show that voter fraud is very very very rare... and it stands to reason. Who'd risk a felony from a few lousy votes? Personally I had to input my driver's license, they checked my signature

Good for you. In person voting is not a concern, like I said, voting by mail and vote harvesting are the issues.

Can't anyone explain, like you or @MelloDawg said has been done multiple times, where 26 million new votes came from in 2020. If there's an explanation that bests my speculation, I'd like to hear it, as I haven't yet, despite your confidence and assurances.

Sounds like it would hold up in a court of law to me. Judgment for the plaintiff.

Still haven't explained where 26 million new voters came from in 2022. Why are you ducking the question?

How many weeks will pass without an answer from those of you who claim and believe all mail-in-voting elections are squeaky clean and were in 2020 and 2022?

There have been explanations in links provided in this thread. That said, the “fraud cuz a pipe burst in Georgia and something something Venezuela and Dominion and the mules again” explanation is just easier to compute for some.

In other news, it’s almost 2023.

UW_Doog_Bot said:

MelloDawg said:

TurdBomber said:

MelloDawg said:

TurdBomber said:

AOG said:

TurdBomber said:

Regardless of party, mail in voting and especially vote harvesting invite malarky and shenanigans by breaking the chain of custody and having no means of verifying a ballot was properly filled out by the person's name it bears. No ID, no precinct, signature verification is a joke, so it's mostly based on good faith, which the party who pushed Russian Collusion for 4 years is not entitled to.

If elections aren't secure, there's no way to validate them, and the party in power doesn't indict or investigate itself, so by the time Election Day rolls around, it's too late to challenge without a boatload of cash, volunteers, and a court willing to allow audits, which few are, because it's much easier to throw the problems back into the lap of the legislature and say, "you wanted this, you got it."

Speculation... the facts are that multiple studies have show that voter fraud is very very very rare... and it stands to reason. Who'd risk a felony from a few lousy votes? Personally I had to input my driver's license, they checked my signature

Good for you. In person voting is not a concern, like I said, voting by mail and vote harvesting are the issues.

Can't anyone explain, like you or @MelloDawg said has been done multiple times, where 26 million new votes came from in 2020. If there's an explanation that bests my speculation, I'd like to hear it, as I haven't yet, despite your confidence and assurances.

Sounds like it would hold up in a court of law to me. Judgment for the plaintiff.

Still haven't explained where 26 million new voters came from in 2022. Why are you ducking the question?

How many weeks will pass without an answer from those of you who claim and believe all mail-in-voting elections are squeaky clean and were in 2020 and 2022?

There have been explanations in links provided in this thread. That said, the “fraud cuz a pipe burst in Georgia and something something Venezuela and Dominion and the mules again” explanation is just easier to compute for some.

In other news, it’s almost 2023.

And yet you swallowed "studies show" without [Citation]. Studies...

Right along party lines.

Higher voter turnout = More votes?

TugCons can’t be sure. Need an unbiased study.

TurdBomber said:

AOG said:

TurdBomber said:

AOG said:

HHusky said:

AOG said:

TurdBomber said:

AOG said:

TurdBomber said:

Regardless of party, mail in voting and especially vote harvesting invite malarky and shenanigans by breaking the chain of custody and having no means of verifying a ballot was properly filled out by the person's name it bears. No ID, no precinct, signature verification is a joke, so it's mostly based on good faith, which the party who pushed Russian Collusion for 4 years is not entitled to.

If elections aren't secure, there's no way to validate them, and the party in power doesn't indict or investigate itself, so by the time Election Day rolls around, it's too late to challenge without a boatload of cash, volunteers, and a court willing to allow audits, which few are, because it's much easier to throw the problems back into the lap of the legislature and say, "you wanted this, you got it."

Speculation... the facts are that multiple studies have show that voter fraud is very very very rare... and it stands to reason. Who'd risk a felony from a few lousy votes? Personally I had to input my driver's license, they checked my signature

Good for you. In person voting is not a concern, like I said, voting by mail and vote harvesting are the issues.

Can't anyone explain, like you or @MelloDawg said has been done multiple times, where 26 million new votes came from in 2020. If there's an explanation that bests my speculation, I'd like to hear it, as I haven't yet, despite your confidence and assurances.

look man, stop citing anything but proof of fraud. There is no end to the way you can take reality, be selective of the facts, and come up with something that looks suspicious.... but basically here is some info https://www.brookings.edu/research/turnout-in-2020-spiked-among-both-democratic-and-republican-voting-groups-new-census-data-shows/

I know we're all shocked that TurdForBrains is still mindlessly repeating his question on the next page.

'Cuz he was really curious.

somebody should tip off ShitForBrainsBomber that there is this new invention since the internet called the "search engine." Altavista is a possibility. You type in things like "compare 2016 2020 election" and then you get links to a number of reports, typically from think-tanks run by a lot of people with Ivy League educations.

So the answer is that you're too lazy or incapable of answering a basic simple question, and still swallow "Ivy League educations" - the Homes for Woke Culture and Racial Segregation - as credible sources for your information.

Of course I am incapable on my own of answering the question since I don't have fucking data in front of me. That's why, einstein, you look it up.

Libtard Hallmark.

JFC that's fucking Gold.

26 million “new” votes POTD

'04 122 million votes
'08 130 million votes
'12 127 million votes
'16 129 million votes
'20 155 million votes

Nothing to see here, say the libtards. It's 2023. Move on.

HHusky said:

TurdBomber said:

'04 122 million votes
'08 130 million votes
'12 127 million votes
'16 129 million votes
'20 155 million votes

Nothing to see here, say the libtards. It's 2023. Move on.

Two low voter participation rate elections followed by one that saw relatively high voter participation by recent standards. Voter participation over 60% is too far fetched for TurdForBrains.

Largest increase in past 2020 years was 8 million who turned out for Obama. Ever seen a more compelling candidate?

Yes! In 2020! A geriatric fool from his basement who couldn't draw flies in public trounces Hillary's count by 15 million votes.

81 Million Votes!! Who can reasonably question that? More compelling and popular candidate than Obama!

Wanna buy a bridge?