Kari Lake tweet this morning

MelloDawg said:

TurdBomber said:

AOG said:

TurdBomber said:

Regardless of party, mail in voting and especially vote harvesting invite malarky and shenanigans by breaking the chain of custody and having no means of verifying a ballot was properly filled out by the person's name it bears. No ID, no precinct, signature verification is a joke, so it's mostly based on good faith, which the party who pushed Russian Collusion for 4 years is not entitled to.

If elections aren't secure, there's no way to validate them, and the party in power doesn't indict or investigate itself, so by the time Election Day rolls around, it's too late to challenge without a boatload of cash, volunteers, and a court willing to allow audits, which few are, because it's much easier to throw the problems back into the lap of the legislature and say, "you wanted this, you got it."

Speculation... the facts are that multiple studies have show that voter fraud is very very very rare... and it stands to reason. Who'd risk a felony from a few lousy votes? Personally I had to input my driver's license, they checked my signature

Good for you. In person voting is not a concern, like I said, voting by mail and vote harvesting are the issues.

Can't anyone explain, like you or @MelloDawg said has been done multiple times, where 26 million new votes came from in 2020. If there's an explanation that bests my speculation, I'd like to hear it, as I haven't yet, despite your confidence and assurances.

Sounds like it would hold up in a court of law to me. Judgment for the plaintiff.

MelloDawg said:

TurdBomber said:

AOG said:

TurdBomber said:

Regardless of party, mail in voting and especially vote harvesting invite malarky and shenanigans by breaking the chain of custody and having no means of verifying a ballot was properly filled out by the person's name it bears. No ID, no precinct, signature verification is a joke, so it's mostly based on good faith, which the party who pushed Russian Collusion for 4 years is not entitled to.

If elections aren't secure, there's no way to validate them, and the party in power doesn't indict or investigate itself, so by the time Election Day rolls around, it's too late to challenge without a boatload of cash, volunteers, and a court willing to allow audits, which few are, because it's much easier to throw the problems back into the lap of the legislature and say, "you wanted this, you got it."

Speculation... the facts are that multiple studies have show that voter fraud is very very very rare... and it stands to reason. Who'd risk a felony from a few lousy votes? Personally I had to input my driver's license, they checked my signature

Good for you. In person voting is not a concern, like I said, voting by mail and vote harvesting are the issues.

Can't anyone explain, like you or @MelloDawg said has been done multiple times, where 26 million new votes came from in 2020. If there's an explanation that bests my speculation, I'd like to hear it, as I haven't yet, despite your confidence and assurances.

Sounds like it would hold up in a court of law to me. Judgment for the plaintiff.

TurdBomber said:

AOG said:

Great news! Marjorie Taylor Crazy has declared Kari Lake the winner! And, she "could care less" what vile things you say about her.

Why are you so threatened by a woman, AOG?

Sledog said:

Some know it was crooked but are threatened with arrest...

https://www.theepochtimes.com/arizona-county-board-supervisor-says-he-voted-to-certify-election-under-duress_4892251.html

HHusky said:

AOG said:

TurdBomber said:

AOG said:

TurdBomber said:

Regardless of party, mail in voting and especially vote harvesting invite malarky and shenanigans by breaking the chain of custody and having no means of verifying a ballot was properly filled out by the person's name it bears. No ID, no precinct, signature verification is a joke, so it's mostly based on good faith, which the party who pushed Russian Collusion for 4 years is not entitled to.

If elections aren't secure, there's no way to validate them, and the party in power doesn't indict or investigate itself, so by the time Election Day rolls around, it's too late to challenge without a boatload of cash, volunteers, and a court willing to allow audits, which few are, because it's much easier to throw the problems back into the lap of the legislature and say, "you wanted this, you got it."

Speculation... the facts are that multiple studies have show that voter fraud is very very very rare... and it stands to reason. Who'd risk a felony from a few lousy votes? Personally I had to input my driver's license, they checked my signature

Good for you. In person voting is not a concern, like I said, voting by mail and vote harvesting are the issues.

Can't anyone explain, like you or @MelloDawg said has been done multiple times, where 26 million new votes came from in 2020. If there's an explanation that bests my speculation, I'd like to hear it, as I haven't yet, despite your confidence and assurances.

look man, stop citing anything but proof of fraud. There is no end to the way you can take reality, be selective of the facts, and come up with something that looks suspicious.... but basically here is some info https://www.brookings.edu/research/turnout-in-2020-spiked-among-both-democratic-and-republican-voting-groups-new-census-data-shows/

I know we're all shocked that TurdForBrains is still mindlessly repeating his question on the next page.

'Cuz he was really curious.

AOG said:

HHusky said:

AOG said:

TurdBomber said:

AOG said:

TurdBomber said:

Regardless of party, mail in voting and especially vote harvesting invite malarky and shenanigans by breaking the chain of custody and having no means of verifying a ballot was properly filled out by the person's name it bears. No ID, no precinct, signature verification is a joke, so it's mostly based on good faith, which the party who pushed Russian Collusion for 4 years is not entitled to.

If elections aren't secure, there's no way to validate them, and the party in power doesn't indict or investigate itself, so by the time Election Day rolls around, it's too late to challenge without a boatload of cash, volunteers, and a court willing to allow audits, which few are, because it's much easier to throw the problems back into the lap of the legislature and say, "you wanted this, you got it."

Speculation... the facts are that multiple studies have show that voter fraud is very very very rare... and it stands to reason. Who'd risk a felony from a few lousy votes? Personally I had to input my driver's license, they checked my signature

Good for you. In person voting is not a concern, like I said, voting by mail and vote harvesting are the issues.

Can't anyone explain, like you or @MelloDawg said has been done multiple times, where 26 million new votes came from in 2020. If there's an explanation that bests my speculation, I'd like to hear it, as I haven't yet, despite your confidence and assurances.

look man, stop citing anything but proof of fraud. There is no end to the way you can take reality, be selective of the facts, and come up with something that looks suspicious.... but basically here is some info https://www.brookings.edu/research/turnout-in-2020-spiked-among-both-democratic-and-republican-voting-groups-new-census-data-shows/

I know we're all shocked that TurdForBrains is still mindlessly repeating his question on the next page.

'Cuz he was really curious.

somebody should tip off ShitForBrainsBomber that there is this new invention since the internet called the "search engine." Altavista is a possibility. You type in things like "compare 2016 2020 election" and then you get links to a number of reports, typically from think-tanks run by a lot of people with Ivy League educations.

TurdBomber said:

AOG said:

HHusky said:

AOG said:

TurdBomber said:

AOG said:

TurdBomber said:

Regardless of party, mail in voting and especially vote harvesting invite malarky and shenanigans by breaking the chain of custody and having no means of verifying a ballot was properly filled out by the person's name it bears. No ID, no precinct, signature verification is a joke, so it's mostly based on good faith, which the party who pushed Russian Collusion for 4 years is not entitled to.

If elections aren't secure, there's no way to validate them, and the party in power doesn't indict or investigate itself, so by the time Election Day rolls around, it's too late to challenge without a boatload of cash, volunteers, and a court willing to allow audits, which few are, because it's much easier to throw the problems back into the lap of the legislature and say, "you wanted this, you got it."

Speculation... the facts are that multiple studies have show that voter fraud is very very very rare... and it stands to reason. Who'd risk a felony from a few lousy votes? Personally I had to input my driver's license, they checked my signature

Good for you. In person voting is not a concern, like I said, voting by mail and vote harvesting are the issues.

Can't anyone explain, like you or @MelloDawg said has been done multiple times, where 26 million new votes came from in 2020. If there's an explanation that bests my speculation, I'd like to hear it, as I haven't yet, despite your confidence and assurances.

look man, stop citing anything but proof of fraud. There is no end to the way you can take reality, be selective of the facts, and come up with something that looks suspicious.... but basically here is some info https://www.brookings.edu/research/turnout-in-2020-spiked-among-both-democratic-and-republican-voting-groups-new-census-data-shows/

I know we're all shocked that TurdForBrains is still mindlessly repeating his question on the next page.

'Cuz he was really curious.

somebody should tip off ShitForBrainsBomber that there is this new invention since the internet called the "search engine." Altavista is a possibility. You type in things like "compare 2016 2020 election" and then you get links to a number of reports, typically from think-tanks run by a lot of people with Ivy League educations.

So the answer is that you're too lazy or incapable of answering a basic simple question, and still swallow "Ivy League educations" - the Homes for Woke Culture and Racial Segregation - as credible sources for your information.

UW_Doog_Bot said:

Swaye said:

I'm surprised any of you keep arguing with Team Prog over this. They will never change their minds. They WANT no chain of custody. They WANT opportunity for fraud. Just like they are trying to change election laws to lets felons and illegals vote, etc. They have no valid reasons for wanting less verification, thus security, in the system. And because their position is indefensible, I mean who could possibly be against one citizen one verifiable vote, they have forced Jim Crow 2.0 into the lexicon. Same as it's always been. If your position has no basis in fairness, but you can't say that, blame racism. The progs here know that all the legislative efforts to loosen vote security are by design, to ensure Dems get elected. And if you complain about it, you must be a racist.

Republicans are going to have to figure out a way to win in this environment, and then when finally in power do not puss out, stand up to the charges of racism, and fix election laws state by state. See DeSantis, Ron, for ways to do that.

This but also.

It's obvious these people have no values or principles.

They don't care if they are hypocrites. They don't care if they are liars. They don't care if they've been proven wrong and given a [Citation]. They don't care if they apply moving standards and goalposts. They don't care if something is purely partisan. It's all just a means to an end for people who lack any internal morality.

They are partisans and appartchiks who have internalized the party propaganda as part of their identity. They are demoocrats.



@MelloDawg @HHusky @BearsWiin consistently demonstrate it by parroting the party line. All while maintaining a delusional sense of moral and intellectual superiority.

TurdBomber said:

MelloDawg said:

TurdBomber said:

AOG said:

TurdBomber said:

Regardless of party, mail in voting and especially vote harvesting invite malarky and shenanigans by breaking the chain of custody and having no means of verifying a ballot was properly filled out by the person's name it bears. No ID, no precinct, signature verification is a joke, so it's mostly based on good faith, which the party who pushed Russian Collusion for 4 years is not entitled to.

If elections aren't secure, there's no way to validate them, and the party in power doesn't indict or investigate itself, so by the time Election Day rolls around, it's too late to challenge without a boatload of cash, volunteers, and a court willing to allow audits, which few are, because it's much easier to throw the problems back into the lap of the legislature and say, "you wanted this, you got it."

Speculation... the facts are that multiple studies have show that voter fraud is very very very rare... and it stands to reason. Who'd risk a felony from a few lousy votes? Personally I had to input my driver's license, they checked my signature

Good for you. In person voting is not a concern, like I said, voting by mail and vote harvesting are the issues.

Can't anyone explain, like you or @MelloDawg said has been done multiple times, where 26 million new votes came from in 2020. If there's an explanation that bests my speculation, I'd like to hear it, as I haven't yet, despite your confidence and assurances.

Sounds like it would hold up in a court of law to me. Judgment for the plaintiff.

Still haven't explained where 26 million new voters came from in 2022. Why are you ducking the question?

How many weeks will pass without an answer from those of you who claim and believe all mail-in-voting elections are squeaky clean and were in 2020 and 2022?

UW_Doog_Bot said:

MelloDawg said:

TurdBomber said:

MelloDawg said:

TurdBomber said:

AOG said:

TurdBomber said:

Regardless of party, mail in voting and especially vote harvesting invite malarky and shenanigans by breaking the chain of custody and having no means of verifying a ballot was properly filled out by the person's name it bears. No ID, no precinct, signature verification is a joke, so it's mostly based on good faith, which the party who pushed Russian Collusion for 4 years is not entitled to.

If elections aren't secure, there's no way to validate them, and the party in power doesn't indict or investigate itself, so by the time Election Day rolls around, it's too late to challenge without a boatload of cash, volunteers, and a court willing to allow audits, which few are, because it's much easier to throw the problems back into the lap of the legislature and say, "you wanted this, you got it."

Speculation... the facts are that multiple studies have show that voter fraud is very very very rare... and it stands to reason. Who'd risk a felony from a few lousy votes? Personally I had to input my driver's license, they checked my signature

Good for you. In person voting is not a concern, like I said, voting by mail and vote harvesting are the issues.

Can't anyone explain, like you or @MelloDawg said has been done multiple times, where 26 million new votes came from in 2020. If there's an explanation that bests my speculation, I'd like to hear it, as I haven't yet, despite your confidence and assurances.

Sounds like it would hold up in a court of law to me. Judgment for the plaintiff.

Still haven't explained where 26 million new voters came from in 2022. Why are you ducking the question?

How many weeks will pass without an answer from those of you who claim and believe all mail-in-voting elections are squeaky clean and were in 2020 and 2022?

There have been explanations in links provided in this thread. That said, the “fraud cuz a pipe burst in Georgia and something something Venezuela and Dominion and the mules again” explanation is just easier to compute for some.

In other news, it’s almost 2023.

And yet you swallowed "studies show" without [Citation]. Studies...

Right along party lines.

TurdBomber said:

AOG said:

TurdBomber said:

AOG said:

HHusky said:

AOG said:

TurdBomber said:

AOG said:

TurdBomber said:

Regardless of party, mail in voting and especially vote harvesting invite malarky and shenanigans by breaking the chain of custody and having no means of verifying a ballot was properly filled out by the person's name it bears. No ID, no precinct, signature verification is a joke, so it's mostly based on good faith, which the party who pushed Russian Collusion for 4 years is not entitled to.

If elections aren't secure, there's no way to validate them, and the party in power doesn't indict or investigate itself, so by the time Election Day rolls around, it's too late to challenge without a boatload of cash, volunteers, and a court willing to allow audits, which few are, because it's much easier to throw the problems back into the lap of the legislature and say, "you wanted this, you got it."

Speculation... the facts are that multiple studies have show that voter fraud is very very very rare... and it stands to reason. Who'd risk a felony from a few lousy votes? Personally I had to input my driver's license, they checked my signature

Good for you. In person voting is not a concern, like I said, voting by mail and vote harvesting are the issues.

Can't anyone explain, like you or @MelloDawg said has been done multiple times, where 26 million new votes came from in 2020. If there's an explanation that bests my speculation, I'd like to hear it, as I haven't yet, despite your confidence and assurances.

look man, stop citing anything but proof of fraud. There is no end to the way you can take reality, be selective of the facts, and come up with something that looks suspicious.... but basically here is some info https://www.brookings.edu/research/turnout-in-2020-spiked-among-both-democratic-and-republican-voting-groups-new-census-data-shows/

I know we're all shocked that TurdForBrains is still mindlessly repeating his question on the next page.

'Cuz he was really curious.

somebody should tip off ShitForBrainsBomber that there is this new invention since the internet called the "search engine." Altavista is a possibility. You type in things like "compare 2016 2020 election" and then you get links to a number of reports, typically from think-tanks run by a lot of people with Ivy League educations.

So the answer is that you're too lazy or incapable of answering a basic simple question, and still swallow "Ivy League educations" - the Homes for Woke Culture and Racial Segregation - as credible sources for your information.

Of course I am incapable on my own of answering the question since I don't have fucking data in front of me. That's why, einstein, you look it up.

Libtard Hallmark.

JFC that's fucking Gold.

HHusky said:

TurdBomber said:

'04 122 million votes
'08 130 million votes
'12 127 million votes
'16 129 million votes
'20 155 million votes

Nothing to see here, say the libtards. It's 2023. Move on.

Two low voter participation rate elections followed by one that saw relatively high voter participation by recent standards. Voter participation over 60% is too far fetched for TurdForBrains.