Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Some one help me out here. Why did the P12 switch from a North and South division alignment to a

EwaDawg
EwaDawg Member Posts: 4,467
in Hardcore Husky Board
jumble of 12 teams?
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • Joey
    Joey Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,594 Founders Club
    Because they’re dum dums
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SpoonieLuv
    SpoonieLuv Member Posts: 5,470

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WoolleyDoog
    WoolleyDoog Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,927 Founders Club
    Hey, North Division champs again. Hang the fucking banner. Maybe it will trigger Criscobal.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • godawgst
    godawgst Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,614 Swaye's Wigwam
    To increase (or at minimum enhance) changes we could get at least one team in playoff.

    If Lanning doesn't screw the pooch vs. us and Beavs Pac12 would have had #4 SC vs #5 Ducks in Champ game with winner assured of spot.



    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LawDawg1
    LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,946
    I thought it was to appease USC and UCLA. Regardless, one year in the purpose of putting the top two teams was a standard Pac 12 fail. UW has one less loss, beat the team that Utah lost to in the tiebreaker, and has a higher playoff ranking.

    I’d like Vorel and Caple to ask Uw AD what pressure they will put on Pac 12 to fix this shit. Fucking tiebreaker in this scenario should simply be head to head, and if that doesn’t do it, then playoff ranking.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,880 Standard Supporter
    godawgst said:

    To increase (or at minimum enhance) changes we could get at least one team in playoff.

    If Lanning doesn't screw the pooch vs. us and Beavs Pac12 would have had #4 SC vs #5 Ducks in Champ game with winner assured of spot.



    This. Don't want the possibility of an 8 win division champ getting the title and screwing up the playoff chances.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LawDawg1
    LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,946
    BleachedAnusDawg said:

    godawgst said:

    To increase (or at minimum enhance) changes we could get at least one team in playoff.

    If Lanning doesn't screw the pooch vs. us and Beavs Pac12 would have had #4 SC vs #5 Ducks in Champ game with winner assured of spot.



    This. Don't want the possibility of an 8 win division champ getting the title and screwing up the playoff chances.
    Then the fucktarded tie breaker should be based on playoff ranking.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter