Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
T. Lyons
HFNY
Member Posts: 5,381
It looks like the WR and ND are no longer considering each other (ND may be full now) so he is down to UW and Miami. Unless Miami tries to buy him, I think he pops to UW.
Comments
-
He looks fast. Hope he comes here. There was another wr we were in on that just committed to ucla. I think the dominos have fallen.
-
And besides Lyons, Juco CB Channing Canada (great porn name) is taking an OV this weekend.
-
That's the guy I really wantHFNY said:And besides Lyons, Juco CB Channing Canada (great porn name) is taking an OV this weekend.
-
Yes I CanadaHFNY said:And besides Lyons, Juco CB Channing Canada (great porn name) is taking an OV this weekend.
-
Another new offer out to a JC CB:
https://247sports.com/Recruitment/Kendel-Dolby-159375/RecruitInterests/ -
I realize the portal changes how quickly you can rebuild a program … but doesn’t it feel like there’s going to be a very definitive bottoming out of young developing talent on this roster at some point in the near future?
-
I'm not sure I follow you, do you mean that the newish staff is focusing more on transfers and Jucos and less on getting in high school kids that they can develop for a year or two before they start?Tequilla said:I realize the portal changes how quickly you can rebuild a program … but doesn’t it feel like there’s going to be a very definitive bottoming out of young developing talent on this roster at some point in the near future?
-
Pretty muchHFNY said:
I'm not sure I follow you, do you mean that the newish staff is focusing more on transfers and Jucos and less on getting in high school kids that they can develop for a year or two before they start?Tequilla said:I realize the portal changes how quickly you can rebuild a program … but doesn’t it feel like there’s going to be a very definitive bottoming out of young developing talent on this roster at some point in the near future?
I view JCs and transfers as routes to augment gaps in your roster and not as an annual solution
The more years that you lean on JCs and transfers to field a roster the more that you’re effectively going to require more numbers to fill those holes
That doesn’t even account for the lack of depth (big factor in ASU loss) that this approach almost assuredly will result in -
82 of the 114 players on this year's team are underclassmen and we have 18 commits for this year's class. I think the coaches realize they need someone to bridge the gap next year given how our freshmen and sophomore DBs played this year. I'm not seeing the JUCO or Portal route helping out any other position groups, so it might not be a major concernTequilla said:
Pretty muchHFNY said:
I'm not sure I follow you, do you mean that the newish staff is focusing more on transfers and Jucos and less on getting in high school kids that they can develop for a year or two before they start?Tequilla said:I realize the portal changes how quickly you can rebuild a program … but doesn’t it feel like there’s going to be a very definitive bottoming out of young developing talent on this roster at some point in the near future?
I view JCs and transfers as routes to augment gaps in your roster and not as an annual solution
The more years that you lean on JCs and transfers to field a roster the more that you’re effectively going to require more numbers to fill those holes
That doesn’t even account for the lack of depth (big factor in ASU loss) that this approach almost assuredly will result in -
Let’s look at the numbers after the season … I suspect there are going to be some players portaling out as wellwhatshouldicareabout said:
82 of the 114 players on this year's team are underclassmen and we have 18 commits for this year's class. I think the coaches realize they need someone to bridge the gap next year given how our freshmen and sophomore DBs played this year. I'm not seeing the JUCO or Portal route helping out any other position groups, so it might not be a major concernTequilla said:
Pretty muchHFNY said:
I'm not sure I follow you, do you mean that the newish staff is focusing more on transfers and Jucos and less on getting in high school kids that they can develop for a year or two before they start?Tequilla said:I realize the portal changes how quickly you can rebuild a program … but doesn’t it feel like there’s going to be a very definitive bottoming out of young developing talent on this roster at some point in the near future?
I view JCs and transfers as routes to augment gaps in your roster and not as an annual solution
The more years that you lean on JCs and transfers to field a roster the more that you’re effectively going to require more numbers to fill those holes
That doesn’t even account for the lack of depth (big factor in ASU loss) that this approach almost assuredly will result in -
Definitely, at least two DBs and maybe 1 OL, 1 DL will portal out.
I see at least two DBs coming in via JC or portals coming in and maybe a QB depending on what happens with Lincoln K. Probably 1 more player at another position (DE or LB). But still that would only be 4 or 5.Tequilla said:
Let’s look at the numbers after the season … I suspect there are going to be some players portaling out as wellwhatshouldicareabout said:
82 of the 114 players on this year's team are underclassmen and we have 18 commits for this year's class. I think the coaches realize they need someone to bridge the gap next year given how our freshmen and sophomore DBs played this year. I'm not seeing the JUCO or Portal route helping out any other position groups, so it might not be a major concernTequilla said:
Pretty muchHFNY said:
I'm not sure I follow you, do you mean that the newish staff is focusing more on transfers and Jucos and less on getting in high school kids that they can develop for a year or two before they start?Tequilla said:I realize the portal changes how quickly you can rebuild a program … but doesn’t it feel like there’s going to be a very definitive bottoming out of young developing talent on this roster at some point in the near future?
I view JCs and transfers as routes to augment gaps in your roster and not as an annual solution
The more years that you lean on JCs and transfers to field a roster the more that you’re effectively going to require more numbers to fill those holes
That doesn’t even account for the lack of depth (big factor in ASU loss) that this approach almost assuredly will result in -
Yeah, I'm expecting 6-8 players portaling after the season, plus a few others retiring. I still think DB is the only one where we'd consider a portal or JUCO, thought I wouldn't be surprised what happens with QB when Keinholz flips to tOSU.Tequilla said:
Let’s look at the numbers after the season … I suspect there are going to be some players portaling out as wellwhatshouldicareabout said:
82 of the 114 players on this year's team are underclassmen and we have 18 commits for this year's class. I think the coaches realize they need someone to bridge the gap next year given how our freshmen and sophomore DBs played this year. I'm not seeing the JUCO or Portal route helping out any other position groups, so it might not be a major concernTequilla said:
Pretty muchHFNY said:
I'm not sure I follow you, do you mean that the newish staff is focusing more on transfers and Jucos and less on getting in high school kids that they can develop for a year or two before they start?Tequilla said:I realize the portal changes how quickly you can rebuild a program … but doesn’t it feel like there’s going to be a very definitive bottoming out of young developing talent on this roster at some point in the near future?
I view JCs and transfers as routes to augment gaps in your roster and not as an annual solution
The more years that you lean on JCs and transfers to field a roster the more that you’re effectively going to require more numbers to fill those holes
That doesn’t even account for the lack of depth (big factor in ASU loss) that this approach almost assuredly will result in -
With the way things are with programs and portals I’d baseline 10+ for basically any programwhatshouldicareabout said:
Yeah, I'm expecting 6-8 players portaling after the season, plus a few others retiring. I still think DB is the only one where we'd consider a portal or JUCO, thought I wouldn't be surprised what happens with QB when Keinholz flips to tOSU.Tequilla said:
Let’s look at the numbers after the season … I suspect there are going to be some players portaling out as wellwhatshouldicareabout said:
82 of the 114 players on this year's team are underclassmen and we have 18 commits for this year's class. I think the coaches realize they need someone to bridge the gap next year given how our freshmen and sophomore DBs played this year. I'm not seeing the JUCO or Portal route helping out any other position groups, so it might not be a major concernTequilla said:
Pretty muchHFNY said:
I'm not sure I follow you, do you mean that the newish staff is focusing more on transfers and Jucos and less on getting in high school kids that they can develop for a year or two before they start?Tequilla said:I realize the portal changes how quickly you can rebuild a program … but doesn’t it feel like there’s going to be a very definitive bottoming out of young developing talent on this roster at some point in the near future?
I view JCs and transfers as routes to augment gaps in your roster and not as an annual solution
The more years that you lean on JCs and transfers to field a roster the more that you’re effectively going to require more numbers to fill those holes
That doesn’t even account for the lack of depth (big factor in ASU loss) that this approach almost assuredly will result in
Perhaps I’ll go through the roster after the season and look at what players I think are an early departure risk for whatever reason -
Your posts make me wonder why I learned to read.Tequilla said:
With the way things are with programs and portals I’d baseline 10+ for basically any programwhatshouldicareabout said:
Yeah, I'm expecting 6-8 players portaling after the season, plus a few others retiring. I still think DB is the only one where we'd consider a portal or JUCO, thought I wouldn't be surprised what happens with QB when Keinholz flips to tOSU.Tequilla said:
Let’s look at the numbers after the season … I suspect there are going to be some players portaling out as wellwhatshouldicareabout said:
82 of the 114 players on this year's team are underclassmen and we have 18 commits for this year's class. I think the coaches realize they need someone to bridge the gap next year given how our freshmen and sophomore DBs played this year. I'm not seeing the JUCO or Portal route helping out any other position groups, so it might not be a major concernTequilla said:
Pretty muchHFNY said:
I'm not sure I follow you, do you mean that the newish staff is focusing more on transfers and Jucos and less on getting in high school kids that they can develop for a year or two before they start?Tequilla said:I realize the portal changes how quickly you can rebuild a program … but doesn’t it feel like there’s going to be a very definitive bottoming out of young developing talent on this roster at some point in the near future?
I view JCs and transfers as routes to augment gaps in your roster and not as an annual solution
The more years that you lean on JCs and transfers to field a roster the more that you’re effectively going to require more numbers to fill those holes
That doesn’t even account for the lack of depth (big factor in ASU loss) that this approach almost assuredly will result in
Perhaps I’ll go through the roster after the season and look at what players I think are an early departure risk for whatever reason -
I'm on the edge of my seat.Tequilla said:
With the way things are with programs and portals I’d baseline 10+ for basically any programwhatshouldicareabout said:
Yeah, I'm expecting 6-8 players portaling after the season, plus a few others retiring. I still think DB is the only one where we'd consider a portal or JUCO, thought I wouldn't be surprised what happens with QB when Keinholz flips to tOSU.Tequilla said:
Let’s look at the numbers after the season … I suspect there are going to be some players portaling out as wellwhatshouldicareabout said:
82 of the 114 players on this year's team are underclassmen and we have 18 commits for this year's class. I think the coaches realize they need someone to bridge the gap next year given how our freshmen and sophomore DBs played this year. I'm not seeing the JUCO or Portal route helping out any other position groups, so it might not be a major concernTequilla said:
Pretty muchHFNY said:
I'm not sure I follow you, do you mean that the newish staff is focusing more on transfers and Jucos and less on getting in high school kids that they can develop for a year or two before they start?Tequilla said:I realize the portal changes how quickly you can rebuild a program … but doesn’t it feel like there’s going to be a very definitive bottoming out of young developing talent on this roster at some point in the near future?
I view JCs and transfers as routes to augment gaps in your roster and not as an annual solution
The more years that you lean on JCs and transfers to field a roster the more that you’re effectively going to require more numbers to fill those holes
That doesn’t even account for the lack of depth (big factor in ASU loss) that this approach almost assuredly will result in
Perhaps I’ll go through the roster after the season and look at what players I think are an early departure risk for whatever reason -
If you go stare into the sun long enough you won’t have that problem anymoreCallMeBigErn said:
Your posts make me wonder why I learned to read.Tequilla said:
With the way things are with programs and portals I’d baseline 10+ for basically any programwhatshouldicareabout said:
Yeah, I'm expecting 6-8 players portaling after the season, plus a few others retiring. I still think DB is the only one where we'd consider a portal or JUCO, thought I wouldn't be surprised what happens with QB when Keinholz flips to tOSU.Tequilla said:
Let’s look at the numbers after the season … I suspect there are going to be some players portaling out as wellwhatshouldicareabout said:
82 of the 114 players on this year's team are underclassmen and we have 18 commits for this year's class. I think the coaches realize they need someone to bridge the gap next year given how our freshmen and sophomore DBs played this year. I'm not seeing the JUCO or Portal route helping out any other position groups, so it might not be a major concernTequilla said:
Pretty muchHFNY said:
I'm not sure I follow you, do you mean that the newish staff is focusing more on transfers and Jucos and less on getting in high school kids that they can develop for a year or two before they start?Tequilla said:I realize the portal changes how quickly you can rebuild a program … but doesn’t it feel like there’s going to be a very definitive bottoming out of young developing talent on this roster at some point in the near future?
I view JCs and transfers as routes to augment gaps in your roster and not as an annual solution
The more years that you lean on JCs and transfers to field a roster the more that you’re effectively going to require more numbers to fill those holes
That doesn’t even account for the lack of depth (big factor in ASU loss) that this approach almost assuredly will result in
Perhaps I’ll go through the roster after the season and look at what players I think are an early departure risk for whatever reason -
-
So you're saying Lyons is going to pop to the Huskies soon huh?backthepack said:😉
-
Miami people are saying he doesn't want to leave the west coastHFNY said:
So you're saying Lyons is going to pop to the Huskies soon huh?backthepack said:😉
-
Like how Kaho wanted to be closer to family and then moved from Nevada to Alabama?backthepack said:
Miami people are saying he doesn't want to leave the west coastHFNY said:
So you're saying Lyons is going to pop to the Huskies soon huh?backthepack said:😉
-
This guy has been a tease since the summer. Not over until he signs.
-
Where he had a stellar special teams career!whatshouldicareabout said:
Like how Kaho wanted to be closer to family and then moved from Nevada to Alabama?backthepack said:
Miami people are saying he doesn't want to leave the west coastHFNY said:
So you're saying Lyons is going to pop to the Huskies soon huh?backthepack said:😉
-
Lyons is leaving a spot open for Colorado, which was his most recent offer.
"So what’s crazy is, the day they offered me. I actually just hit them up randomly an hour previous to that. Hearing that Deion was going to get the head spot, I just hit up Colorado saying I wanted to see what it's like playing for Deion."
-
Looking for an excuse to go somewhere else.RDR said:
Lyons is leaving a spot open for Colorado, which was his most recent offer.
"So what’s crazy is, the day they offered me. I actually just hit them up randomly an hour previous to that. Hearing that Deion was going to get the head spot, I just hit up Colorado saying I wanted to see what it's like playing for Deion." -
Should someone tell him about the Transfer Portal?
I mean this is only the most liberating era of college athletics with the ability to move without eligibility issues.
-
Yeah, and apparently Colorado said “Let’s get a commitment graphic made for you” and he had to tell them he didn’t even have an offer yet.RDR said:
Lyons is leaving a spot open for Colorado, which was his most recent offer.
"So what’s crazy is, the day they offered me. I actually just hit them up randomly an hour previous to that. Hearing that Deion was going to get the head spot, I just hit up Colorado saying I wanted to see what it's like playing for Deion."
-
Huffman and Wiltfong crystal dongs
-
Great get, I like his upside. He has some McMillan in him.
