Home› The Fisching Hole (Recruiting)

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

T. Lyons

HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 5,371
in The Fisching Hole (Recruiting)
It looks like the WR and ND are no longer considering each other (ND may be full now) so he is down to UW and Miami. Unless Miami tries to buy him, I think he pops to UW.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • AtomicDawgAtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,324
    He looks fast. Hope he comes here. There was another wr we were in on that just committed to ucla. I think the dominos have fallen.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,497
    HFNY said:

    And besides Lyons, Juco CB Channing Canada (great porn name) is taking an OV this weekend.

    That's the guy I really want
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,828
    HFNY said:

    And besides Lyons, Juco CB Channing Canada (great porn name) is taking an OV this weekend.

    Yes I Canada
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 5,371
    Another new offer out to a JC CB:

    https://247sports.com/Recruitment/Kendel-Dolby-159375/RecruitInterests/
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 20,088
    I realize the portal changes how quickly you can rebuild a program … but doesn’t it feel like there’s going to be a very definitive bottoming out of young developing talent on this roster at some point in the near future?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 5,371
    Tequilla said:

    I realize the portal changes how quickly you can rebuild a program … but doesn’t it feel like there’s going to be a very definitive bottoming out of young developing talent on this roster at some point in the near future?

    I'm not sure I follow you, do you mean that the newish staff is focusing more on transfers and Jucos and less on getting in high school kids that they can develop for a year or two before they start?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 20,088
    HFNY said:

    Tequilla said:

    I realize the portal changes how quickly you can rebuild a program … but doesn’t it feel like there’s going to be a very definitive bottoming out of young developing talent on this roster at some point in the near future?

    I'm not sure I follow you, do you mean that the newish staff is focusing more on transfers and Jucos and less on getting in high school kids that they can develop for a year or two before they start?
    Pretty much

    I view JCs and transfers as routes to augment gaps in your roster and not as an annual solution

    The more years that you lean on JCs and transfers to field a roster the more that you’re effectively going to require more numbers to fill those holes

    That doesn’t even account for the lack of depth (big factor in ASU loss) that this approach almost assuredly will result in
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,984
    Tequilla said:

    HFNY said:

    Tequilla said:

    I realize the portal changes how quickly you can rebuild a program … but doesn’t it feel like there’s going to be a very definitive bottoming out of young developing talent on this roster at some point in the near future?

    I'm not sure I follow you, do you mean that the newish staff is focusing more on transfers and Jucos and less on getting in high school kids that they can develop for a year or two before they start?
    Pretty much

    I view JCs and transfers as routes to augment gaps in your roster and not as an annual solution

    The more years that you lean on JCs and transfers to field a roster the more that you’re effectively going to require more numbers to fill those holes

    That doesn’t even account for the lack of depth (big factor in ASU loss) that this approach almost assuredly will result in
    82 of the 114 players on this year's team are underclassmen and we have 18 commits for this year's class. I think the coaches realize they need someone to bridge the gap next year given how our freshmen and sophomore DBs played this year. I'm not seeing the JUCO or Portal route helping out any other position groups, so it might not be a major concern
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 20,088
    whatshouldicareabout said:

    Tequilla said:

    HFNY said:

    Tequilla said:

    I realize the portal changes how quickly you can rebuild a program … but doesn’t it feel like there’s going to be a very definitive bottoming out of young developing talent on this roster at some point in the near future?

    I'm not sure I follow you, do you mean that the newish staff is focusing more on transfers and Jucos and less on getting in high school kids that they can develop for a year or two before they start?
    Pretty much

    I view JCs and transfers as routes to augment gaps in your roster and not as an annual solution

    The more years that you lean on JCs and transfers to field a roster the more that you’re effectively going to require more numbers to fill those holes

    That doesn’t even account for the lack of depth (big factor in ASU loss) that this approach almost assuredly will result in
    82 of the 114 players on this year's team are underclassmen and we have 18 commits for this year's class. I think the coaches realize they need someone to bridge the gap next year given how our freshmen and sophomore DBs played this year. I'm not seeing the JUCO or Portal route helping out any other position groups, so it might not be a major concern
    Let’s look at the numbers after the season … I suspect there are going to be some players portaling out as well
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 5,371
    Definitely, at least two DBs and maybe 1 OL, 1 DL will portal out.

    I see at least two DBs coming in via JC or portals coming in and maybe a QB depending on what happens with Lincoln K. Probably 1 more player at another position (DE or LB). But still that would only be 4 or 5.
    Tequilla said:

    whatshouldicareabout said:

    Tequilla said:

    HFNY said:

    Tequilla said:

    I realize the portal changes how quickly you can rebuild a program … but doesn’t it feel like there’s going to be a very definitive bottoming out of young developing talent on this roster at some point in the near future?

    I'm not sure I follow you, do you mean that the newish staff is focusing more on transfers and Jucos and less on getting in high school kids that they can develop for a year or two before they start?
    Pretty much

    I view JCs and transfers as routes to augment gaps in your roster and not as an annual solution

    The more years that you lean on JCs and transfers to field a roster the more that you’re effectively going to require more numbers to fill those holes

    That doesn’t even account for the lack of depth (big factor in ASU loss) that this approach almost assuredly will result in
    82 of the 114 players on this year's team are underclassmen and we have 18 commits for this year's class. I think the coaches realize they need someone to bridge the gap next year given how our freshmen and sophomore DBs played this year. I'm not seeing the JUCO or Portal route helping out any other position groups, so it might not be a major concern
    Let’s look at the numbers after the season … I suspect there are going to be some players portaling out as well
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,984
    Tequilla said:

    whatshouldicareabout said:

    Tequilla said:

    HFNY said:

    Tequilla said:

    I realize the portal changes how quickly you can rebuild a program … but doesn’t it feel like there’s going to be a very definitive bottoming out of young developing talent on this roster at some point in the near future?

    I'm not sure I follow you, do you mean that the newish staff is focusing more on transfers and Jucos and less on getting in high school kids that they can develop for a year or two before they start?
    Pretty much

    I view JCs and transfers as routes to augment gaps in your roster and not as an annual solution

    The more years that you lean on JCs and transfers to field a roster the more that you’re effectively going to require more numbers to fill those holes

    That doesn’t even account for the lack of depth (big factor in ASU loss) that this approach almost assuredly will result in
    82 of the 114 players on this year's team are underclassmen and we have 18 commits for this year's class. I think the coaches realize they need someone to bridge the gap next year given how our freshmen and sophomore DBs played this year. I'm not seeing the JUCO or Portal route helping out any other position groups, so it might not be a major concern
    Let’s look at the numbers after the season … I suspect there are going to be some players portaling out as well
    Yeah, I'm expecting 6-8 players portaling after the season, plus a few others retiring. I still think DB is the only one where we'd consider a portal or JUCO, thought I wouldn't be surprised what happens with QB when Keinholz flips to tOSU.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 20,088
    whatshouldicareabout said:

    Tequilla said:

    whatshouldicareabout said:

    Tequilla said:

    HFNY said:

    Tequilla said:

    I realize the portal changes how quickly you can rebuild a program … but doesn’t it feel like there’s going to be a very definitive bottoming out of young developing talent on this roster at some point in the near future?

    I'm not sure I follow you, do you mean that the newish staff is focusing more on transfers and Jucos and less on getting in high school kids that they can develop for a year or two before they start?
    Pretty much

    I view JCs and transfers as routes to augment gaps in your roster and not as an annual solution

    The more years that you lean on JCs and transfers to field a roster the more that you’re effectively going to require more numbers to fill those holes

    That doesn’t even account for the lack of depth (big factor in ASU loss) that this approach almost assuredly will result in
    82 of the 114 players on this year's team are underclassmen and we have 18 commits for this year's class. I think the coaches realize they need someone to bridge the gap next year given how our freshmen and sophomore DBs played this year. I'm not seeing the JUCO or Portal route helping out any other position groups, so it might not be a major concern
    Let’s look at the numbers after the season … I suspect there are going to be some players portaling out as well
    Yeah, I'm expecting 6-8 players portaling after the season, plus a few others retiring. I still think DB is the only one where we'd consider a portal or JUCO, thought I wouldn't be surprised what happens with QB when Keinholz flips to tOSU.
    With the way things are with programs and portals I’d baseline 10+ for basically any program

    Perhaps I’ll go through the roster after the season and look at what players I think are an early departure risk for whatever reason
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CallMeBigErnCallMeBigErn Member Posts: 8,028
    Tequilla said:

    whatshouldicareabout said:

    Tequilla said:

    whatshouldicareabout said:

    Tequilla said:

    HFNY said:

    Tequilla said:

    I realize the portal changes how quickly you can rebuild a program … but doesn’t it feel like there’s going to be a very definitive bottoming out of young developing talent on this roster at some point in the near future?

    I'm not sure I follow you, do you mean that the newish staff is focusing more on transfers and Jucos and less on getting in high school kids that they can develop for a year or two before they start?
    Pretty much

    I view JCs and transfers as routes to augment gaps in your roster and not as an annual solution

    The more years that you lean on JCs and transfers to field a roster the more that you’re effectively going to require more numbers to fill those holes

    That doesn’t even account for the lack of depth (big factor in ASU loss) that this approach almost assuredly will result in
    82 of the 114 players on this year's team are underclassmen and we have 18 commits for this year's class. I think the coaches realize they need someone to bridge the gap next year given how our freshmen and sophomore DBs played this year. I'm not seeing the JUCO or Portal route helping out any other position groups, so it might not be a major concern
    Let’s look at the numbers after the season … I suspect there are going to be some players portaling out as well
    Yeah, I'm expecting 6-8 players portaling after the season, plus a few others retiring. I still think DB is the only one where we'd consider a portal or JUCO, thought I wouldn't be surprised what happens with QB when Keinholz flips to tOSU.
    With the way things are with programs and portals I’d baseline 10+ for basically any program

    Perhaps I’ll go through the roster after the season and look at what players I think are an early departure risk for whatever reason
    Your posts make me wonder why I learned to read.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DoogerMcFarlandDoogerMcFarland Member Posts: 745
    Tequilla said:

    whatshouldicareabout said:

    Tequilla said:

    whatshouldicareabout said:

    Tequilla said:

    HFNY said:

    Tequilla said:

    I realize the portal changes how quickly you can rebuild a program … but doesn’t it feel like there’s going to be a very definitive bottoming out of young developing talent on this roster at some point in the near future?

    I'm not sure I follow you, do you mean that the newish staff is focusing more on transfers and Jucos and less on getting in high school kids that they can develop for a year or two before they start?
    Pretty much

    I view JCs and transfers as routes to augment gaps in your roster and not as an annual solution

    The more years that you lean on JCs and transfers to field a roster the more that you’re effectively going to require more numbers to fill those holes

    That doesn’t even account for the lack of depth (big factor in ASU loss) that this approach almost assuredly will result in
    82 of the 114 players on this year's team are underclassmen and we have 18 commits for this year's class. I think the coaches realize they need someone to bridge the gap next year given how our freshmen and sophomore DBs played this year. I'm not seeing the JUCO or Portal route helping out any other position groups, so it might not be a major concern
    Let’s look at the numbers after the season … I suspect there are going to be some players portaling out as well
    Yeah, I'm expecting 6-8 players portaling after the season, plus a few others retiring. I still think DB is the only one where we'd consider a portal or JUCO, thought I wouldn't be surprised what happens with QB when Keinholz flips to tOSU.
    With the way things are with programs and portals I’d baseline 10+ for basically any program

    Perhaps I’ll go through the roster after the season and look at what players I think are an early departure risk for whatever reason
    I'm on the edge of my seat.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 20,088
    CallMeBigErn said:

    Tequilla said:

    whatshouldicareabout said:

    Tequilla said:

    whatshouldicareabout said:

    Tequilla said:

    HFNY said:

    Tequilla said:

    I realize the portal changes how quickly you can rebuild a program … but doesn’t it feel like there’s going to be a very definitive bottoming out of young developing talent on this roster at some point in the near future?

    I'm not sure I follow you, do you mean that the newish staff is focusing more on transfers and Jucos and less on getting in high school kids that they can develop for a year or two before they start?
    Pretty much

    I view JCs and transfers as routes to augment gaps in your roster and not as an annual solution

    The more years that you lean on JCs and transfers to field a roster the more that you’re effectively going to require more numbers to fill those holes

    That doesn’t even account for the lack of depth (big factor in ASU loss) that this approach almost assuredly will result in
    82 of the 114 players on this year's team are underclassmen and we have 18 commits for this year's class. I think the coaches realize they need someone to bridge the gap next year given how our freshmen and sophomore DBs played this year. I'm not seeing the JUCO or Portal route helping out any other position groups, so it might not be a major concern
    Let’s look at the numbers after the season … I suspect there are going to be some players portaling out as well
    Yeah, I'm expecting 6-8 players portaling after the season, plus a few others retiring. I still think DB is the only one where we'd consider a portal or JUCO, thought I wouldn't be surprised what happens with QB when Keinholz flips to tOSU.
    With the way things are with programs and portals I’d baseline 10+ for basically any program

    Perhaps I’ll go through the roster after the season and look at what players I think are an early departure risk for whatever reason
    Your posts make me wonder why I learned to read.
    If you go stare into the sun long enough you won’t have that problem anymore
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,937
    😉
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 5,371
    backthepack said:

    😉

    So you're saying Lyons is going to pop to the Huskies soon huh?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,937
    HFNY said:

    backthepack said:

    😉

    So you're saying Lyons is going to pop to the Huskies soon huh?
    Miami people are saying he doesn't want to leave the west coast
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.