Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Yes this is real
Comments
-
4 degrees and doesn't know the difference between a count and an audit and calls those who do stupidHHusky said:
They are sometimes recounted as well.PurpleThrobber said:
No they aren't.HHusky said:
Elections are audited.WestlinnDuck said:
When you "find" ballots, the elections are not controlled. When you can't audit ballot results and fight any investigation into the election process, the election is not controlled. Most US corporations are regulated and subjected to Sarbanes-Oxley internal controls. Those like Enron and FTX were not subject to rigorous internal controls and look what happened. I want honest elections with strict internal controls and segregation of duties with auditable results. You don't. Most elections in the US are honest. But way too many are not and those control the future of our country.HHusky said:
Election ignoramus thinks elections are uncontrolled.WestlinnDuck said:No need for internal controls according to our mythical MBA. Look at how well Enron and FTX and Maricopa County turned out. It's only fake money and votes
No matter how much you plug your ears and stomp your pretty little feet, they are audited.
That's how they keep catching all those dumb mother fucking Republicans casting their dead relative's ballots.
They are re-counted.
A guy with an "MBA" should know what an audit entails.
You must be the smartest kid in remedial civics!
Long live the leftards -
The closest we got to a real audit was in Arizona. Only thing off limits were the machine passwords and an official canvassing of voters. Essentially all that matters.
-
Civics has nothing to do with audits.HHusky said:
They are sometimes recounted as well.PurpleThrobber said:
No they aren't.HHusky said:
Elections are audited.WestlinnDuck said:
When you "find" ballots, the elections are not controlled. When you can't audit ballot results and fight any investigation into the election process, the election is not controlled. Most US corporations are regulated and subjected to Sarbanes-Oxley internal controls. Those like Enron and FTX were not subject to rigorous internal controls and look what happened. I want honest elections with strict internal controls and segregation of duties with auditable results. You don't. Most elections in the US are honest. But way too many are not and those control the future of our country.HHusky said:
Election ignoramus thinks elections are uncontrolled.WestlinnDuck said:No need for internal controls according to our mythical MBA. Look at how well Enron and FTX and Maricopa County turned out. It's only fake money and votes
No matter how much you plug your ears and stomp your pretty little feet, they are audited.
That's how they keep catching all those dumb mother fucking Republicans casting their dead relative's ballots.
They are re-counted.
A guy with an "MBA" should know what an audit entails.
You must be the smartest kid in remedial civics!
Go ahead and add "audits" to your Russian state narrative homework.
-
You would need a list of ballots returned before counting and logged in and secured with sign offs. You would need a list of the vote counts. They should match. No ballots counted which were not logged in at secure site at the close of the polls. No postmarks. County has to have the ballots. No signature dates after the election day. Makes it tough to find ballots. No ballot harvesting. Clean voter rolls. All opposed by our mythical MBA. End vote by push mail.Bob_C said:The closest we got to a real audit was in Arizona. Only thing off limits were the machine passwords and an official canvassing of voters. Essentially all that matters.
-
Just string the outright lies and half-truths together and you have a Daddy voter.WestlinnDuck said:
You would need a list of ballots returned before counting and logged in and secured with sign offs. You would need a list of the vote counts. They should match. No ballots counted which were not logged in at secure site at the close of the polls. No postmarks. County has to have the ballots. No signature dates after the election day. Makes it tough to find ballots. No ballot harvesting. Clean voter rolls. All opposed by our mythical MBA. End vote by push mail.Bob_C said:The closest we got to a real audit was in Arizona. Only thing off limits were the machine passwords and an official canvassing of voters. Essentially all that matters.
Well done, Gasbag! -
We know in many elections chain of custody requirements are regularly ignored completely in the case of Georgia. If you "find" ballots obviously the chain of custody was broken.
-
Mail-in ballots aren't going anywhere. Easiest fix to give everyone their mail-in drug, is to stop using the mail, put scanners on drop boxes, scan in ID, then scan ballot, door opens. Post pickup audit that the counts match the scans and the scans match the underlying ballot. Creates an electronic chain of custody and a total ballot universe (with locations) and ensures no ballot harvesting.Sledog said:We know in many elections chain of custody requirements are regularly ignored completely in the case of Georgia. If you "find" ballots obviously the chain of custody was broken.
-
Speaking of that, how did the whole voter suppressiony, Jim Crow thing go in Georgia? How fucking stupid was that?HHusky said:
Just string the outright lies and half-truths together and you have a Daddy voter.WestlinnDuck said:
You would need a list of ballots returned before counting and logged in and secured with sign offs. You would need a list of the vote counts. They should match. No ballots counted which were not logged in at secure site at the close of the polls. No postmarks. County has to have the ballots. No signature dates after the election day. Makes it tough to find ballots. No ballot harvesting. Clean voter rolls. All opposed by our mythical MBA. End vote by push mail.Bob_C said:The closest we got to a real audit was in Arizona. Only thing off limits were the machine passwords and an official canvassing of voters. Essentially all that matters.
Well done, Gasbag! -
On cross exam, you would draw out the outright lies and half-truths. You suck at this.HHusky said:
Just string the outright lies and half-truths together and you have a Daddy voter.WestlinnDuck said:
You would need a list of ballots returned before counting and logged in and secured with sign offs. You would need a list of the vote counts. They should match. No ballots counted which were not logged in at secure site at the close of the polls. No postmarks. County has to have the ballots. No signature dates after the election day. Makes it tough to find ballots. No ballot harvesting. Clean voter rolls. All opposed by our mythical MBA. End vote by push mail.Bob_C said:The closest we got to a real audit was in Arizona. Only thing off limits were the machine passwords and an official canvassing of voters. Essentially all that matters.
Well done, Gasbag! -
It was Jim Crow 2.0. So not just Jim Crow. 2.0 is WAY worse. Biggest threat we face actually.hardhat said:
Speaking of that, how did the whole voter suppressiony, Jim Crow thing go in Georgia? How fucking stupid was that?HHusky said:
Just string the outright lies and half-truths together and you have a Daddy voter.WestlinnDuck said:
You would need a list of ballots returned before counting and logged in and secured with sign offs. You would need a list of the vote counts. They should match. No ballots counted which were not logged in at secure site at the close of the polls. No postmarks. County has to have the ballots. No signature dates after the election day. Makes it tough to find ballots. No ballot harvesting. Clean voter rolls. All opposed by our mythical MBA. End vote by push mail.Bob_C said:The closest we got to a real audit was in Arizona. Only thing off limits were the machine passwords and an official canvassing of voters. Essentially all that matters.
Well done, Gasbag!
