I looked at Nate’s “forecast”. If you just give both sides the slam dunk races (greater than 80% odds) it becomes 80% overall probability for republicans to get at least 51. That said, PA is gonna get stolen so that’s not in the forecast.
And they have worked very hard to message that if you even question a Democrat win you are a domestic terrorist, so voting "irregularities" can just occur right out in the open now and if you question it, you should be on a watchlist.
I have no issue with pocketbook voting. In fact, I encourage it. It’s up to our congressional leadership to incentivize those individuals along a path that is economically best for our republic, and they are failing miserably.
Possibly because their failures are not fairly and freely exposed? We have a corrupt media and now a behemoth technocracy which is benefitting from the corruption in government. The people do not regain the liberty promissed by our constitution without bloodshed.
I looked at Nate’s “forecast”. If you just give both sides the slam dunk races (greater than 80% odds) it becomes 80% overall probability for republicans to get at least 51. That said, PA is gonna get stolen so that’s not in the forecast.
I miss the old Daily Show that skewered the mainstream media's election coverage. Now it's unfunny Trevor Noah Arc whining about MAGA Christian Nationalists.
I have no issue with pocketbook voting. In fact, I encourage it. It’s up to our congressional leadership to incentivize those individuals along a path that is economically best for our republic, and they are failing miserably.
Possibly because their failures are not fairly and freely exposed? We have a corrupt media and now a behemoth technocracy which is benefitting from the corruption in government. The people do not regain the liberty promissed by our constitution without bloodshed.
And that's not a prediction of anything to come in the near future. Look how bad things are in some our our 3rd world communist neighbors and their people are still taking the crumbs and living in squalor. As frustrating as all this is, I predict we are hundreds of years from the breaking point.
Charlie Kirk @charliekirk11 · 7m Maricopa County intentionally reduced the number of polling places to create issues like this. Stay in line. Vote in person. 16 182 68
Florida Rejects DOJ Plan to Place Monitors Inside Voting Locations
By Zachary Stieber
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) workers are not allowed inside polling locations, a Florida official has told the agency.
Brad McVay, general counsel for the Florida Department of State, told DOJ election official John Russ that Florida law does not permit DOJ monitors to be stationed inside of polling places after the DOJ announced it would monitor compliance with federal voting laws in three Florida counties.
“Earlier today, the Florida Department of State received copies of your letters to Miami-Dade and Broward Counties in which you seem to indicate that the Department of Justice will send monitors inside polling places in these counties. We also understand you sent a similar letter to Palm Beach County,” McVay wrote in a letter.
“But Department of Justice monitors are not permitted under Florida law.”
Florida law lists people who can enter a polling room or place and DOJ personnel “are not included on the list,” McVay said.
Certain DOJ workers, McVay acknowledged, might fit within the definition of law enforcement officers, who are allowed inside with permission of the local clerk. But “absent some evidence concerning the need for federal intrusion, or some federal statute that preempts Florida law, the presence of federal law enforcement inside polling places would be counterproductive and could potentially undermine confidence in the election,” he told Russ.
The letters to the counties do not demonstrate a need to place federal monitors in the counties, according to the lawyer. None of the counties are subject to any election-related federal agreements, and none have been accused of violating federal laws related to elections.
During a phone call on Monday night, the Department of Justice did not provide any specific authorization for the plan to insert monitors into polling locations, according to McVay.
“Accordingly, the Florida Department of State invokes its authority under section 101.58(2) of the Florida Statutes to send its own monitors to the three targeted jurisdictions. These monitors will ensure that there is no interference with the voting process,” he said.
The DOJ did not respond to a request for comment.
At least one other jurisdiction also pushed back against the DOJ’s plan.
Steve Korsmeyer, the clerk in Cole County, Missouri, told The Epoch Times via email that “the DOJ won’t be allowed into our polling locations.”
He cited state law 115.409, which lists categories of people who are allowed into polling places.
Korsmeyer “has rightfully declined to allow this over-reach and the secretary of state’s office fully supports him,” Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft, a Republican, said in a statement.
The DOJ said it was sending monitors to 64 jurisdictions across 24 states, including Pima County, Arizona; Cobb County, Georgia; and Flint, Michigan. It wasn’t clear how the states were chosen. The goal was to “monitor compliance with federal voting rights laws,” the department said.
DOJ has sent monitors to states for years, including in 18 states in the 2020 election.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, said on Glenn Beck’s radio show that “it’s a pretty unusual move for the federal government to come into a state.”
Asked if he could reject the workers, Paxton said he thought the federal civil rights act gave the U.S. attorney general the power to send monitors into state polling locations.
Charlie Kirk @charliekirk11 · 7m Maricopa County intentionally reduced the number of polling places to create issues like this. Stay in line. Vote in person. 16 182 68
Pima County did the same thing. The recorder openly encouraged people to canvas for a corrupt Dimocrat congressman who has been there 20 years and fake news ignored it.
Something tells me that real audits are going to be an acceptable way to determine winners this time.
There’s still going to be bullshit. 2020 was an extraordinary example of what can be accomplished when there is no fear of repercussion. The media has to care for the general public to care and 2020 was an unprecedented play in the media failing the general population by omission of what was happening on the ground in places like AZ, Michigan, and Wisconsin.
I still don’t think it’s going to be enough to stop the GOP from taking both halls tomorrow night, but stranger things have happened, as recently as 2 years ago.
Trump was so reviled by so many people that they were like eh....a little fraud this time is no biggie compared to trump
Comments
And so the cheating begins!
Mostly peaceful cheating. Anecdotal.
Shills are sporting boners.
Meanwhile at the DNC headquarters...
@charliekirk11
·
7m
Maricopa County intentionally reduced the number of polling places to create issues like this. Stay in line. Vote in person.
16
182
68
By Zachary Stieber
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) workers are not allowed inside polling locations, a Florida official has told the agency.
Brad McVay, general counsel for the Florida Department of State, told DOJ election official John Russ that Florida law does not permit DOJ monitors to be stationed inside of polling places after the DOJ announced it would monitor compliance with federal voting laws in three Florida counties.
“Earlier today, the Florida Department of State received copies of your letters to Miami-Dade and Broward Counties in which you seem to indicate that the Department of Justice will send monitors inside polling places in these counties. We also understand you sent a similar letter to Palm Beach County,” McVay wrote in a letter.
“But Department of Justice monitors are not permitted under Florida law.”
Florida law lists people who can enter a polling room or place and DOJ personnel “are not included on the list,” McVay said.
Certain DOJ workers, McVay acknowledged, might fit within the definition of law enforcement officers, who are allowed inside with permission of the local clerk. But “absent some evidence concerning the need for federal intrusion, or some federal statute that preempts Florida law, the presence of federal law enforcement inside polling places would be counterproductive and could potentially undermine confidence in the election,” he told Russ.
The letters to the counties do not demonstrate a need to place federal monitors in the counties, according to the lawyer. None of the counties are subject to any election-related federal agreements, and none have been accused of violating federal laws related to elections.
During a phone call on Monday night, the Department of Justice did not provide any specific authorization for the plan to insert monitors into polling locations, according to McVay.
“Accordingly, the Florida Department of State invokes its authority under section 101.58(2) of the Florida Statutes to send its own monitors to the three targeted jurisdictions. These monitors will ensure that there is no interference with the voting process,” he said.
The DOJ did not respond to a request for comment.
At least one other jurisdiction also pushed back against the DOJ’s plan.
Steve Korsmeyer, the clerk in Cole County, Missouri, told The Epoch Times via email that “the DOJ won’t be allowed into our polling locations.”
He cited state law 115.409, which lists categories of people who are allowed into polling places.
Korsmeyer “has rightfully declined to allow this over-reach and the secretary of state’s office fully supports him,” Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft, a Republican, said in a statement.
The DOJ said it was sending monitors to 64 jurisdictions across 24 states, including Pima County, Arizona; Cobb County, Georgia; and Flint, Michigan. It wasn’t clear how the states were chosen. The goal was to “monitor compliance with federal voting rights laws,” the department said.
DOJ has sent monitors to states for years, including in 18 states in the 2020 election.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, said on Glenn Beck’s radio show that “it’s a pretty unusual move for the federal government to come into a state.”
Asked if he could reject the workers, Paxton said he thought the federal civil rights act gave the U.S. attorney general the power to send monitors into state polling locations.