Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Tucker Carlson: The US is about to run out of diesel fuel

2

Comments

  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,917
    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    Homerun.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,818 Founders Club
    MelloDawg said:

    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    Homerun.
    Another diesel fuel shortage denier?

    Sad

    How do you explain all the other sources?

    @Sources
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,710 Standard Supporter
    25 days reserve is inadequate. But hey we don't need oil! Electric trucks are rolling as we speak.

    To a stop.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    MelloDawg said:

    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    Homerun.
    Hi
    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    Link, please . . .
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    Cheap energy has been great for civilization. I for one want it to continue. I also don’t want 7 year old kids mining lithium.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,358 Founders Club
    MelloDawg said:

    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    Homerun.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,980 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    Another classic dazzler take that aged well.

    https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/101409/truckers-in-parts-of-the-country-only-being-allowed-a-half-tank-of-diesel#latest
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    Shall we put this on your tab, madam?




    This claim — even Fox admits that Carlson is a liar who cannot be believed! — has become such a common trope among liberals that it is impossible to count how many times I have heard it. And that is because the liberal sector of the corporate media blared this claim in headlines over and over after the lawsuit against Fox was dismissed.

    https://greenwald.substack.com/p/a-court-ruled-rachel-maddows-viewers





    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter