Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Tucker Carlson: The US is about to run out of diesel fuel

DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 63,622 Founders Club
in Tug Tavern
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUZoli8oekg
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,402 Standard Supporter
    Heating oil now $7.00 a gallon in the NE. Average tank size in 275 gallons and lasts less than two months. I don't want to hear one person that voted for the dementia patient say a damn word about it costing more than a thousand dollars more to fill their tank.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Southerndawg said:

    One of many consequences for having a "high character" dementia addled moron play president while under the control of petulant deviant children. If we do run out of diesel we will be supremely fucked.

    EV's are the answer I've heard. "Do it, do it now."
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    WestlinnDuck said:

    Heating oil now $7.00 a gallon in the NE. Average tank size in 275 gallons and lasts less than two months. I don't want to hear one person that voted for the dementia patient say a damn word about it costing more than a thousand dollars more to fill their tank.

    Solar panels are the answer I've heard. "Do it, do it now."
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,989
    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,280 Standard Supporter
    WestlinnDuck said:

    Heating oil now $7.00 a gallon in the NE. Average tank size in 275 gallons and lasts less than two months. I don't want to hear one person that voted for the dementia patient say a damn word about it costing more than a thousand dollars more to fill their tank.

    Mostly peaceful freezing to death.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,402 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    Most of what Tucker does is facts supported by either clips or interviews. Tucker killed it on Hunter's laptop with Bobulinski on his show with actual emails from the laptop. It was your team that had a general tenor that it was Russian disinformation. It's a fact that US hospitals were performing sex change operations on minors. It was your team that had a general tenor that this wasn't happening, in spite of it being posted on hospital websites. It was Tucker that nailed the Russian collusion hoax. It was your team that swallowed the lies and had a general tenor that it Trump was a Russian asset. It was Tucker that has been pushing the impact of dem policies on inflation on food and energy. It was your team that had a general tenor that there was no inflation, that it was transitory, that we should just cut back and enjoy it.

    So, your leftard Fox can't actually discuss topics on which Tucker has the facts wrong. Neither can you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Imagine an alleged lawyer not understanding that lawyers fight to win their cases by presenting arguments that they themselves most likely do not believe. But a jury may.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MelloDawgMelloDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,711 Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    Homerun.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,083 Founders Club
    MelloDawg said:

    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    Homerun.
    Another diesel fuel shortage denier?

    Sad

    How do you explain all the other sources?

    @Sources
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,977 Standard Supporter
    25 days reserve is inadequate. But hey we don't need oil! Electric trucks are rolling as we speak.

    To a stop.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • trubluetrublue Member Posts: 3,042
    MelloDawg said:

    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    Homerun.
    Hi
    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    Link, please . . .
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jecorneljecornel Member Posts: 9,727
    Cheap energy has been great for civilization. I for one want it to continue. I also don’t want 7 year old kids mining lithium.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,304 Founders Club
    MelloDawg said:

    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    Homerun.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,402 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    Another classic dazzler take that aged well.

    https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/101409/truckers-in-parts-of-the-country-only-being-allowed-a-half-tank-of-diesel#latest
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • hardhathardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    Shall we put this on your tab, madam?




    This claim — even Fox admits that Carlson is a liar who cannot be believed! — has become such a common trope among liberals that it is impossible to count how many times I have heard it. And that is because the liberal sector of the corporate media blared this claim in headlines over and over after the lawsuit against Fox was dismissed.

    https://greenwald.substack.com/p/a-court-ruled-rachel-maddows-viewers





    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.