Tucker Carlson: The US is about to run out of diesel fuel
Comments
-
One of many consequences for having a "high character" dementia addled moron play president while under the control of petulant deviant children. If we do run out of diesel we will be supremely fucked.
-
Heating oil now $7.00 a gallon in the NE. Average tank size in 275 gallons and lasts less than two months. I don't want to hear one person that voted for the dementia patient say a damn word about it costing more than a thousand dollars more to fill their tank.
-
EV's are the answer I've heard. "Do it, do it now."Southerndawg said:One of many consequences for having a "high character" dementia addled moron play president while under the control of petulant deviant children. If we do run out of diesel we will be supremely fucked.
-
Solar panels are the answer I've heard. "Do it, do it now."WestlinnDuck said:Heating oil now $7.00 a gallon in the NE. Average tank size in 275 gallons and lasts less than two months. I don't want to hear one person that voted for the dementia patient say a damn word about it costing more than a thousand dollars more to fill their tank.
-
This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.
-
Mostly peaceful freezing to death.WestlinnDuck said:Heating oil now $7.00 a gallon in the NE. Average tank size in 275 gallons and lasts less than two months. I don't want to hear one person that voted for the dementia patient say a damn word about it costing more than a thousand dollars more to fill their tank.
-
Yes rechargeable semi's can travel extremely long distances everyone knows this.
-
Fuck offHHusky said:This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.
https://www.newsweek.com/us-only-has-just-days-diesel-left-before-supply-runs-out-1754851
Feel free to link where we aren't hack -
Most of what Tucker does is facts supported by either clips or interviews. Tucker killed it on Hunter's laptop with Bobulinski on his show with actual emails from the laptop. It was your team that had a general tenor that it was Russian disinformation. It's a fact that US hospitals were performing sex change operations on minors. It was your team that had a general tenor that this wasn't happening, in spite of it being posted on hospital websites. It was Tucker that nailed the Russian collusion hoax. It was your team that swallowed the lies and had a general tenor that it Trump was a Russian asset. It was Tucker that has been pushing the impact of dem policies on inflation on food and energy. It was your team that had a general tenor that there was no inflation, that it was transitory, that we should just cut back and enjoy it.HHusky said:This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.
So, your leftard Fox can't actually discuss topics on which Tucker has the facts wrong. Neither can you. -
Imagine an alleged lawyer not understanding that lawyers fight to win their cases by presenting arguments that they themselves most likely do not believe. But a jury may.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUZoli8oekg





