Tucker Carlson: The US is about to run out of diesel fuel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUZoli8oekgComments
-
One of many consequences for having a "high character" dementia addled moron play president while under the control of petulant deviant children. If we do run out of diesel we will be supremely fucked.
-
Heating oil now $7.00 a gallon in the NE. Average tank size in 275 gallons and lasts less than two months. I don't want to hear one person that voted for the dementia patient say a damn word about it costing more than a thousand dollars more to fill their tank.
-
EV's are the answer I've heard. "Do it, do it now."Southerndawg said:One of many consequences for having a "high character" dementia addled moron play president while under the control of petulant deviant children. If we do run out of diesel we will be supremely fucked.
-
Solar panels are the answer I've heard. "Do it, do it now."WestlinnDuck said:Heating oil now $7.00 a gallon in the NE. Average tank size in 275 gallons and lasts less than two months. I don't want to hear one person that voted for the dementia patient say a damn word about it costing more than a thousand dollars more to fill their tank.
-
This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.
-
Mostly peaceful freezing to death.WestlinnDuck said:Heating oil now $7.00 a gallon in the NE. Average tank size in 275 gallons and lasts less than two months. I don't want to hear one person that voted for the dementia patient say a damn word about it costing more than a thousand dollars more to fill their tank.
-
Yes rechargeable semi's can travel extremely long distances everyone knows this.
-
Fuck offHHusky said:This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.
https://www.newsweek.com/us-only-has-just-days-diesel-left-before-supply-runs-out-1754851
Feel free to link where we aren't hack -
Most of what Tucker does is facts supported by either clips or interviews. Tucker killed it on Hunter's laptop with Bobulinski on his show with actual emails from the laptop. It was your team that had a general tenor that it was Russian disinformation. It's a fact that US hospitals were performing sex change operations on minors. It was your team that had a general tenor that this wasn't happening, in spite of it being posted on hospital websites. It was Tucker that nailed the Russian collusion hoax. It was your team that swallowed the lies and had a general tenor that it Trump was a Russian asset. It was Tucker that has been pushing the impact of dem policies on inflation on food and energy. It was your team that had a general tenor that there was no inflation, that it was transitory, that we should just cut back and enjoy it.HHusky said:This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.
So, your leftard Fox can't actually discuss topics on which Tucker has the facts wrong. Neither can you. -
Imagine an alleged lawyer not understanding that lawyers fight to win their cases by presenting arguments that they themselves most likely do not believe. But a jury may.
-
Homerun.HHusky said:This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.
-
Another diesel fuel shortage denier?MelloDawg said:
Homerun.HHusky said:This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.
Sad
How do you explain all the other sources?
@Sources -
25 days reserve is inadequate. But hey we don't need oil! Electric trucks are rolling as we speak.
To a stop. -
HiMelloDawg said:
Homerun.HHusky said:This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.
HHusky said:This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.
Link, please . . .HHusky said:This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.
-
MelloDawg said:
Homerun.HHusky said:This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.
-
Cheap energy has been great for civilization. I for one want it to continue. I also don’t want 7 year old kids mining lithium.
-
Hey, it's not your kids doing the mining, it's some colored kids in Africa so it's okay. Just as long as we don't have to see it, we are saving the world by unsafe and environmentally damaging mining in third world countries provided it is chicom state owned mining companies and not environmentally sensitive American mining companies we can all sleep soundly at night that our hands are clean.jecornel said:Cheap energy has been great for civilization. I for one want it to continue. I also don’t want 7 year old kids mining lithium.
-
MelloDawg said:
Homerun.HHusky said:This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.
-
Another classic dazzler take that aged well.HHusky said:This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.
https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/101409/truckers-in-parts-of-the-country-only-being-allowed-a-half-tank-of-diesel#latest -
Shall we put this on your tab, madam?HHusky said:This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.
This claim — even Fox admits that Carlson is a liar who cannot be believed! — has become such a common trope among liberals that it is impossible to count how many times I have heard it. And that is because the liberal sector of the corporate media blared this claim in headlines over and over after the lawsuit against Fox was dismissed.
https://greenwald.substack.com/p/a-court-ruled-rachel-maddows-viewers
-
Running out of diesel fuel = caravan of nefarious migrants at the southern border.
-
Both bad for the taxpayers and working Americans. You are neither so no worries until the lube supplies start running low, then you are going to really have to bite theMelloDawg said:Running out of diesel fuel = caravan of nefarious migrants at the southern border.
bulletpillow. -
Care to clarify? Is it your conspiracy theory that there is no diesel shortage despite it being widely reported other places than Tucker?MelloDawg said:Running out of diesel fuel = caravan of nefarious migrants at the southern border.
Or is your conspiracy theory that the mass illegal immigration under Biden is not true despite being widely reported by numerous sources?
Are you a liar or stupid? Thanks in advance for your thoughtful fact filled reply -
With no diesel, how is Paul Pelosi going to get his hammers delivered? Drone?MelloDawg said:Running out of diesel fuel = caravan of nefarious migrants at the southern border.
-
How much jet fuel, which is very similar to diesel, are we burning while we fly illegals all over the country. Literally kidnap them. Then fly them to red states and give them free phones, debit cards, food stamps etc.?MelloDawg said:Running out of diesel fuel = caravan of nefarious migrants at the southern border.
Where was all this spending appropriated?
How can you sell out your nation for illegal criminal aliens? Shitbags one and all! -
-
Uhhhh. They HAVE rallied around one central issue... AbortionRaceBannon said: -
It’s never their shitty policies, it’s always the messaging. That tells you all you need to know about that POS fake ass party.
-
Yeah, the dazzler, mello and JW are always on message. The board is chocked with their fact filled support for their central message and policies.46XiJCAB said:It’s never their shitty policies, it’s always the messaging. That tells you all you need to know about that POS fake ass party.
