Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Tucker Carlson: The US is about to run out of diesel fuel

«1

Comments

  • Options
    WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 14,215
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    Heating oil now $7.00 a gallon in the NE. Average tank size in 275 gallons and lasts less than two months. I don't want to hear one person that voted for the dementia patient say a damn word about it costing more than a thousand dollars more to fill their tank.
  • Options
    46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment

    One of many consequences for having a "high character" dementia addled moron play president while under the control of petulant deviant children. If we do run out of diesel we will be supremely fucked.

    EV's are the answer I've heard. "Do it, do it now."
  • Options
    46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment

    Heating oil now $7.00 a gallon in the NE. Average tank size in 275 gallons and lasts less than two months. I don't want to hear one person that voted for the dementia patient say a damn word about it costing more than a thousand dollars more to fill their tank.

    Solar panels are the answer I've heard. "Do it, do it now."
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,348
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.
  • Options
    PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 42,175
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes

    Heating oil now $7.00 a gallon in the NE. Average tank size in 275 gallons and lasts less than two months. I don't want to hear one person that voted for the dementia patient say a damn word about it costing more than a thousand dollars more to fill their tank.

    Mostly peaceful freezing to death.
  • Options
    WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 14,215
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    Most of what Tucker does is facts supported by either clips or interviews. Tucker killed it on Hunter's laptop with Bobulinski on his show with actual emails from the laptop. It was your team that had a general tenor that it was Russian disinformation. It's a fact that US hospitals were performing sex change operations on minors. It was your team that had a general tenor that this wasn't happening, in spite of it being posted on hospital websites. It was Tucker that nailed the Russian collusion hoax. It was your team that swallowed the lies and had a general tenor that it Trump was a Russian asset. It was Tucker that has been pushing the impact of dem policies on inflation on food and energy. It was your team that had a general tenor that there was no inflation, that it was transitory, that we should just cut back and enjoy it.

    So, your leftard Fox can't actually discuss topics on which Tucker has the facts wrong. Neither can you.
  • Options
    46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Imagine an alleged lawyer not understanding that lawyers fight to win their cases by presenting arguments that they themselves most likely do not believe. But a jury may.
  • Options
    MelloDawgMelloDawg Member Posts: 6,200
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    Homerun.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 102,226
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    MelloDawg said:

    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    Homerun.
    Another diesel fuel shortage denier?

    Sad

    How do you explain all the other sources?

    @Sources
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 31,384
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes
    25 days reserve is inadequate. But hey we don't need oil! Electric trucks are rolling as we speak.

    To a stop.
  • Options
    trubluetrublue Member Posts: 3,042
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    MelloDawg said:

    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    Homerun.
    Hi
    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    Link, please . . .
  • Options
    jecorneljecornel Member Posts: 9,642
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment
    Standard Supporter
    Cheap energy has been great for civilization. I for one want it to continue. I also don’t want 7 year old kids mining lithium.
  • Options
    SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,244
    5 Awesomes First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment
    Founders Club
    MelloDawg said:

    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    Homerun.

  • Options
    WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 14,215
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    Another classic dazzler take that aged well.

    https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/101409/truckers-in-parts-of-the-country-only-being-allowed-a-half-tank-of-diesel#latest
  • Options
    hardhathardhat Member Posts: 8,343
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    HHusky said:

    This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.

    Shall we put this on your tab, madam?




    This claim — even Fox admits that Carlson is a liar who cannot be believed! — has become such a common trope among liberals that it is impossible to count how many times I have heard it. And that is because the liberal sector of the corporate media blared this claim in headlines over and over after the lawsuit against Fox was dismissed.

    https://greenwald.substack.com/p/a-court-ruled-rachel-maddows-viewers





Sign In or Register to comment.