Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

imminent Couch sell

245

Comments

  • NeGgaPlEaSe
    NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 6,017
    chuck said:

    NeGgaPlEaSe said:

    chuck said:

    Canadawg said:

    Next year could be
    1 Polk
    2 McMillan
    3 Jackson or Alexander or Davis

    and I'm good with that

    Very, very average group on the whole.
    McMillan and Polk are far from Average. Both are better than Petits. Jackson will be a senior and has improved significantly in both running routes getting open and making explosive plays.
    McMillan is still soft and unreliable about catching the ball. He has above average ability for sure but gives away about one play for every rwo he makes.

    Jackson is small and not exceptional in any way. He does ok for what he has, but it's not much imo.

    I love Polk but he doesnt do anything spectacular. He's just a solid guy with decent size.

    The group youre talking about is solid but only has one potential difference maker without Odunze. They need a guy like that.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Canadawg
    Canadawg Member Posts: 6,239 Standard Supporter
    chuck said:

    NeGgaPlEaSe said:

    chuck said:

    Canadawg said:

    Next year could be
    1 Polk
    2 McMillan
    3 Jackson or Alexander or Davis

    and I'm good with that

    Very, very average group on the whole.
    McMillan and Polk are far from Average. Both are better than Petits. Jackson will be a senior and has improved significantly in both running routes getting open and making explosive plays.
    McMillan is still soft and unreliable about catching the ball. He has above average ability for sure but gives away about one play for every rwo he makes.

    Jackson is small and not exceptional in any way. He does ok for what he has, but it's not much imo.

    I love Polk but he doesnt do anything spectacular. He's just a solid guy with decent size.

    The group youre talking about is solid but only has one potential difference maker without Odunze. They need a guy like that.
    I'd say Polk and McMillan have the ability to become full on #1 guys after another year. Not to mention the younger guys have not looked like jags in which case having 3 good recievers is better than having 1 elite one IMO
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,453
    chuck said:

    Canadawg said:

    Next year could be
    1 Polk
    2 McMillan
    3 Jackson or Alexander or Davis

    and I'm good with that

    Very, very average group on the whole.
    Huh?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,864 Swaye's Wigwam
    creepycoug said:

    chuck said:

    Canadawg said:

    Next year could be
    1 Polk
    2 McMillan
    3 Jackson or Alexander or Davis

    and I'm good with that

    Very, very average group on the whole.
    Huh?
    Polk is a good size receiver, not huge, with average speed. I know he's good, but he's not making guys miss with the ball or creating big plays on his own. He's good but not a star.

    McMillan has star stuff but still looks soft and drops balls regularly.

    Jackson is a jag.

    The other hopefuls aren't even getting reps, so who knows?

    Do you think that's an exceptional receiver room with mo Odunze?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Canadawg
    Canadawg Member Posts: 6,239 Standard Supporter
    It's also pretty clear that Shephard knows what he's doing which might be the most important part of how they will look next year
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NeGgaPlEaSe
    NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 6,017
    edited October 2022
    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    NeGgaPlEaSe said:

    chuck said:

    Canadawg said:

    Next year could be
    1 Polk
    2 McMillan
    3 Jackson or Alexander or Davis

    and I'm good with that

    Very, very average group on the whole.
    McMillan and Polk are far from Average. Both are better than Petits. Jackson will be a senior and has improved significantly in both running routes getting open and making explosive plays.
    Polk is nowhere near as good as Pettis. McMillan is getting there, but still not at his level. Him being a weirdo and sucking in the NFL is really causing some people to forget how dominant he was here.
    I don’t recall him doing much without Ross as a receiver. His return game is HOF status

    13 games 63 catches 761 yards 12.1 average
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 13,018
    edited October 2022
    doogville said:

    chuck said:

    NeGgaPlEaSe said:

    chuck said:

    Canadawg said:

    Next year could be
    1 Polk
    2 McMillan
    3 Jackson or Alexander or Davis

    and I'm good with that

    Very, very average group on the whole.
    McMillan and Polk are far from Average. Both are better than Petits. Jackson will be a senior and has improved significantly in both running routes getting open and making explosive plays.
    McMillan is still soft and unreliable about catching the ball. He has above average ability for sure but gives away about one play for every rwo he makes.

    Jackson is small and not exceptional in any way. He does ok for what he has, but it's not much imo.

    I love Polk but he doesnt do anything spectacular. He's just a solid guy with decent size.

    The group youre talking about is solid but only has one potential difference maker without Odunze. They need a guy like that.
    Yea, this Pettis slander will not stand.

    Polk flashes potential, but has had one great game in his career. And then he dissapeared.

    Jackson is a JAG and if he's our 3 next year, we whiffed hard in the portal.
    Jackson has the highest catches-per-target against McMillan and Polk and has the fewest drops. Jackson would be starting on every Pac-12 team except UW and USC
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter