I've been doin some thinking about Lynyrd Skynyrd

YellowSnow said:

Fishpo31 said:

YellowSnow said:

Back in 1997 when I saw the Stones at the Dome, I came up with the Yella Snow 3 / 5 rule. Essentially, if you have 3 / 5 or more of the original lineup including the key founding members, you can keep the band's name. Stones with Jagger, Richards, and Watts still feels like the Stones.

AC /DC and VH are more complicated. I think AC DC pulled the lead singer change off better than anyone and were able to continue to be artistically and commercially relevant. I hate Sammy Hagar but VH was still huge in the late 80s.

Skynyrd though always seemed like a tribute band though. Bear in mind, the only founding member killed on the plane was Ronnie VZ. Gary didn't join until like 1976. Maybe if they has brought in Ronnie's brother right after the crash and decided to keep on going it would have felt different. Something more akin to what AC DC did when their front man died.

Agree. For me, it comes down to are they creating new stuff, or riding the money grab train. AC/DC, VH, and others made new, relevant music.

The big boys (Stones, Who) continued after losing guys, and there are differences, but the legacy is strong. I wouldn’t pay to see either now. The replacement drummers are outstanding, but Charlie and Moon were so distinct in their playing, it’s not close for me.

LZ with Jason Bonham sounded like LZ, but that’s another story…

It is one reason I respect Grohl. He made something new, and continues to do so. A lot of those bands are relegated to the casinos now, playing the “hits”, with one ore two OG’s in the lineup….

LZ's reunions were very minimal. They never really tarnished their reputation.

And when the Beatles were done, they were done.

WHO are nothing but cheesy nostalgia these days and I say that as a guy would would probably rank Pete Townshend as his all time favorite rock song writer.

I'll probably do a poll next week about best classic rock era artist "renaissance" period.

DerekJohnson said:

YellowSnow said:

Back in 1997 when I saw the Stones at the Dome, I came up with the Yella Snow 3 / 5 rule. Essentially, if you have 3 / 5 or more of the original lineup including the key founding members, you can keep the band's name. Stones with Jagger, Richards, and Watts still feels like the Stones.

AC /DC and VH are more complicated. I think AC DC pulled the lead singer change off better than anyone and were able to continue to be artistically and commercially relevant. I hate Sammy Hagar but VH was still huge in the late 80s.

Skynyrd though always seemed like a tribute band though. Bear in mind, the only founding member killed on the plane was Ronnie VZ. Gary didn't join until like 1976. Maybe if they has brought in Ronnie's brother right after the crash and decided to keep on going it would have felt different. Something more akin to what AC DC did when their front man died.

I read that Cassie had actually booked a reservation for a commercial flight but then at the last minute joined the band mates on the plane. She was very worried about the 10' sparks coming out of an engine two days earlier.