1 in 3 jobs are temps?
Comments
-
2009 comparisons are valid because that was the end of the recession, no?RaceBannon said:Comparing numbers to 2009 is like comparing Sark to Ty.
60% of the people working is not good news. The Obama administration wouldn't have changed the way unemployment is counted if the numbers didn't suck so bad.
We're in recovery summer 5 now and the recovery is almost a phantom of the imagination of the 30% that still think Obama has a clue.
Matching the lowest rate since the 70's is horrible news no matter how you spin it. Now we need a Reagan to come along and clean things up.
And what 60% are you talking about? The 62.8% participation rate? The participation rate has been in the 60s forever even during King Ronald the Great's reign.
-
Woodchips could fix all of this you know.
-
recovery:
-
What part of lowest since the 70's did you miss?TheGlove said:
2009 comparisons are valid because that was the end of the recession, no?RaceBannon said:Comparing numbers to 2009 is like comparing Sark to Ty.
60% of the people working is not good news. The Obama administration wouldn't have changed the way unemployment is counted if the numbers didn't suck so bad.
We're in recovery summer 5 now and the recovery is almost a phantom of the imagination of the 30% that still think Obama has a clue.
Matching the lowest rate since the 70's is horrible news no matter how you spin it. Now we need a Reagan to come along and clean things up.
And what 60% are you talking about? The 62.8% participation rate? The participation rate has been in the 60s forever even during King Ronald the Great's reign.
What end of the recession? -
RaceBannon said:
What part of lowest since the 70's did you miss?TheGlove said:
2009 comparisons are valid because that was the end of the recession, no?RaceBannon said:Comparing numbers to 2009 is like comparing Sark to Ty.
60% of the people working is not good news. The Obama administration wouldn't have changed the way unemployment is counted if the numbers didn't suck so bad.
We're in recovery summer 5 now and the recovery is almost a phantom of the imagination of the 30% that still think Obama has a clue.
Matching the lowest rate since the 70's is horrible news no matter how you spin it. Now we need a Reagan to come along and clean things up.
And what 60% are you talking about? The 62.8% participation rate? The participation rate has been in the 60s forever even during King Ronald the Great's reign.
What end of the recession?
http://bit.ly/1pUCS5e -
The news said it so it must be true.RaceBannon said:
What part of lowest since the 70's did you miss?TheGlove said:
2009 comparisons are valid because that was the end of the recession, no?RaceBannon said:Comparing numbers to 2009 is like comparing Sark to Ty.
60% of the people working is not good news. The Obama administration wouldn't have changed the way unemployment is counted if the numbers didn't suck so bad.
We're in recovery summer 5 now and the recovery is almost a phantom of the imagination of the 30% that still think Obama has a clue.
Matching the lowest rate since the 70's is horrible news no matter how you spin it. Now we need a Reagan to come along and clean things up.
And what 60% are you talking about? The 62.8% participation rate? The participation rate has been in the 60s forever even during King Ronald the Great's reign.
What end of the recession? -
This is the most fired up I've seen you in awhile.TheGlove said:RaceBannon said:
What part of lowest since the 70's did you miss?TheGlove said:
2009 comparisons are valid because that was the end of the recession, no?RaceBannon said:Comparing numbers to 2009 is like comparing Sark to Ty.
60% of the people working is not good news. The Obama administration wouldn't have changed the way unemployment is counted if the numbers didn't suck so bad.
We're in recovery summer 5 now and the recovery is almost a phantom of the imagination of the 30% that still think Obama has a clue.
Matching the lowest rate since the 70's is horrible news no matter how you spin it. Now we need a Reagan to come along and clean things up.
And what 60% are you talking about? The 62.8% participation rate? The participation rate has been in the 60s forever even during King Ronald the Great's reign.
What end of the recession?
http://bit.ly/1pUCS5e -
Welcome to Obama's Europe.
-
Figures lie and liars figure and no administration since Nixon has lied as much as Obama
-
off my meds.DerekJohnson said:
This is the most fired up I've seen you in awhile.TheGlove said:RaceBannon said:
What part of lowest since the 70's did you miss?TheGlove said:
2009 comparisons are valid because that was the end of the recession, no?RaceBannon said:Comparing numbers to 2009 is like comparing Sark to Ty.
60% of the people working is not good news. The Obama administration wouldn't have changed the way unemployment is counted if the numbers didn't suck so bad.
We're in recovery summer 5 now and the recovery is almost a phantom of the imagination of the 30% that still think Obama has a clue.
Matching the lowest rate since the 70's is horrible news no matter how you spin it. Now we need a Reagan to come along and clean things up.
And what 60% are you talking about? The 62.8% participation rate? The participation rate has been in the 60s forever even during King Ronald the Great's reign.
What end of the recession?
http://bit.ly/1pUCS5e
