Aranda, Campell, & DeBoer - What is your order of preference?
Comments
-
1. DeBoer || 2. Aranda || 3. CampbellI admittedly never saw this when the OP put it up there. And I admittedly voted with revisionist history and have no shame in doing so.
-
1. DeBoer || 2. Aranda || 3. CampbellFirst and right?
-
1. Aranda || 2. DeBoer || 3. CampbellAranda still has a Sugar Bowl win and Top 5 finish in the AP.
Still, let's hope DeBoer is better -
1. Aranda || 2. DeBoer || 3. CampbellI would have been happy with Aranda. But I definitely wanted DeBoner over Campbell the fraud.
-
1. Aranda || 2. Campbell || 3. DeBoer
I’m still withholding judgement until it’s been proven this wasn’t photoshopped.Mad_Son said:17% of us made the right choice of DeBoer first.
-
1. Aranda || 2. Campbell || 3. DeBoerBump.
-
1. DeBoer || 2. Aranda || 3. CampbellThere is no hope for this program. Coaches who are true winners wouldn't want to come here. They see the AD's priorities are on things other than winning. The current administration (both upper and lower campuses) is not willing to do what it takes. It never will. This university is DOOMED.gif to wallow in mediocrity, at best, for the foreseeable future.
UWAD might get lucky some time in the future and hire a shit-hot coach. He? will win big and then run off to a bigger, better program. -
1. Aranda || 2. Campbell || 3. DeBoer
It chintrigued melongduckdong said:
The entire poll hurt my eyesGladstone said:
-
1. DeBoer || 2. Campbell ||3. ArandaNone of the above
-
1. Aranda || 2. DeBoer || 3. CampbellAranda is 3-2 at Baylor, 1-1 in conference
Campbell is 3-3 at Iowa State, 0-3 in conference
DeBoer is 4-2 at UW, 1-2 in conference -
1. Aranda || 2. DeBoer || 3. Campbell
So the new coach is as good or better than the coaches that already have their guys in there. Thanks.whatshouldicareabout said:Aranda is 3-2 at Baylor, 1-1 in conference
Campbell is 3-3 at Iowa State, 0-3 in conference
DeBoer is 4-2 at UW, 1-2 in conference -
1. Campbell || 2. DeBoer || 3. Aranda
The moral of the story is UW looses. Always.EwaDawg said:
So the new coach is as good or better than the coaches that already have their guys in there. Thanks.whatshouldicareabout said:Aranda is 3-2 at Baylor, 1-1 in conference
Campbell is 3-3 at Iowa State, 0-3 in conference
DeBoer is 4-2 at UW, 1-2 in conference -
1. Campbell || 2. DeBoer || 3. ArandaCampbell is 3-3. You guys think there's a lot of loser talk going on right now. Imagine a 3-3 UW team this year with Campbell talking about how close the locker room is.
-
the story is that all three coaches just need more tim to get their guys in there, and every loss was to a GOOD team.
next year the defense will be flying around, receivers catching everything and the young QBs will step up. -
1. Aranda || 2. DeBoer || 3. Campbell
Doesn't matter who is the best, all 3 suckEwaDawg said:
So the new coach is as good or better than the coaches that already have their guys in there. Thanks.whatshouldicareabout said:Aranda is 3-2 at Baylor, 1-1 in conference
Campbell is 3-3 at Iowa State, 0-3 in conference
DeBoer is 4-2 at UW, 1-2 in conference -
1. Aranda || 2. Campbell || 3. DeBoerAranda's Carebears gave up 43 points and 6ypc to a TUFF Mountaineers team.
Starting to look like the order of preference here didn't matter all that much... -
1. DeBoer || 2. Campbell ||3. Aranda
DeBoer is leading this battle of the midgets 4-2 to 3-3NorwegianHusky said:Aranda's Carebears gave up 43 points and 6ypc to a TUFF Mountaineers team.
Starting to look like the order of preference here didn't matter all that much... -
1. DeBoer || 2. Aranda || 3. Campbell
-
1. Aranda || 2. DeBoer || 3. CampbellAppreciate when's BUMPs make me look stupid. @PurpleBaze is an ego terrorist.
At least I had Campbell in last. That's my only solace. -
1. DeBoer || 2. Aranda || 3. Campbell
I LOL'ed at "ego terrorist".Swaye said:Appreciate when's BUMPs make me look stupid. @PurpleBaze is an ego terrorist.
At least I had Campbell in last. That's my only solace. -
-
1. DeBoer || 2. Campbell ||3. Aranda
-
1. DeBoer || 2. Aranda || 3. CampbellBunch of reactionary retards.
-
1. DeBoer || 2. Aranda || 3. CampbellI didn't see this poast initially, but I just now voted given the evidence at hand. Tuff choice
-
1. DeBoer || 2. Aranda || 3. CampbellCanadawg said:
I change my vote to Campbell, Aranda, Deboer.
Campbell is the only one with any kind of a track record. The others are hopeful shot in the darks to have any consistency.
-
1. DeBoer || 2. Aranda || 3. Campbell
Ooph. Campbell had the track record of being a gump 7-5 ISU coach who won a NY6 against the worst opponent of all time, "Rep the North" orygunPurpleBaze said:Canadawg said:I change my vote to Campbell, Aranda, Deboer.
Campbell is the only one with any kind of a track record. The others are hopeful shot in the darks to have any consistency.
DeBoner transformed offenses everywhere he went and had "Cal pick 6" Haener looking like a Heisman finalist -
1. DeBoer || 2. Aranda || 3. Campbell
This wasn't hard. Aranda I could almost see at the time. Campbell would've been the most cowardly hire possible and an acceptance of playing for 4th place simply because we were afraid of some perceived risk with Deboer.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Ooph. Campbell had the track record of being a gump 7-5 ISU coach who won a NY6 against the worst opponent of all time, "Rep the North" orygunPurpleBaze said:Canadawg said:I change my vote to Campbell, Aranda, Deboer.
Campbell is the only one with any kind of a track record. The others are hopeful shot in the darks to have any consistency.
DeBoner transformed offenses everywhere he went and had "Cal pick 6" Haener looking like a Heisman finalist -
1. DeBoer || 2. Aranda || 3. Campbell
is this .gif from ET (rip) at Point Defiance Zoo?PurpleBaze said:
edit: it can't nvm -
1. DeBoer || 2. Aranda || 3. CampbellThis is why it's important not to vote
-
1. DeBoer || 2. Aranda || 3. Campbell
Agree. Lotta Campbell and Aranda loving dumb asses up in here.Sources said:This is why it's important not to vote
