Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
The view from Illinois
DerekJohnson
Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,495 
Comments
-
great roundup of why Illinois will win
-
You can't expect to beat a big 10 power like Illinois on the road five years after 0-12.
Some of you nega's just have unrealistic expectations. These things take time. You can't expect to win road games OOC until 2018 when Sark has been here 10 years. -
I was quite impressed by the analysis. Great football discussion there.Meek said:great roundup of why Illinois will win
-
In a few weeks i will have 5 reason to share with Illinois fans why the huskies will win rather easily. Say, 34-17?
-
Which graduated and defensive players will feature on our O-Line this year!?MikeDamone said:In a few weeks i will have 5 reason to share with Illinois fans why the huskies will win rather easily. Say, 34-17?
-
BA in music and pursuing a masters in music education.
Too easy... -
An outcome that close on the scoreboard will have the Huskies on top of whatever an Illini is.
-
"Since this game is at Soldier Field in Chicago, Illinois will need to come out ready to play in order to win over Chicago."
Riveting. -
5 reasons has been funny for over 23 times. I love seeing fan reactions who take it seriously.MikeDamone said:In a few weeks i will have 5 reason to share with Illinois fans why the huskies will win rather easily. Say, 34-17?
Better yet is the Doogs who take it seriously and "agree".
-
we are only winning 7 games, but this is one we definitely win. this writer is pretty bias he should write for bleacher.DerekJohnson said:
Illinois is pathetic, who's their coach BTW. However, if this does turn out to be correct, this is the game the doogs finally understand sark's shit.
-
Better yet yet, the doog who chimes in to let others know its a ruse, and a joke.He_Needs_More_Time said:
5 reasons has been funny for over 23 times. I love seeing fan reactions who take it seriously.MikeDamone said:In a few weeks i will have 5 reason to share with Illinois fans why the huskies will win rather easily. Say, 34-17?
Better yet is the Doogs who take it seriously and "agree". -
You think the Doogs will give up on Sark that easily? If they weren't going to give up on him after the WSU loss they aren't after losing to Illinois.dhdawg said:
we are only winning 7 games, but this is one we definitely win. this writer is pretty bias he should write for bleacher.DerekJohnson said:
Illinois is pathetic, who's their coach BTW. However, if this does turn out to be correct, this is the game the doogs finally understand sark's shit.
At that point you'll be hearing "Time to make a QB change" threads. "Sometimes you have to go backwards before you can go forwards", "This team was 0-12, Sark is a victim of his own success. This takes time", "Hey we are in on recruit X, when we land him that will change our program", etc.
Doogs won't give up on Sark until he's fired. Then they'll claim they always knew he wasn't the right coach. -
The economy didn't hit Illinois as bad as it hit Washington....
-
Yes that's always good. I still laugh thinking of when Fetters chimed in with "Has 5 reasons jumped the shark yet?"MikeDamone said:
Better yet yet, the doog who chimes in to let others know its a ruse, and a joke.He_Needs_More_Time said:
5 reasons has been funny for over 23 times. I love seeing fan reactions who take it seriously.MikeDamone said:In a few weeks i will have 5 reason to share with Illinois fans why the huskies will win rather easily. Say, 34-17?
Better yet is the Doogs who take it seriously and "agree". -
you're right, I'm probably underestimating the idiocy of the doogs, however IMHO this would be a worse loss than the WSU game cause winning the WSU game would've meant 0He_Needs_More_Time said:
You think the Doogs will give up on Sark that easily? If they weren't going to give up on him after the WSU loss they aren't after losing to Illinois.dhdawg said:
we are only winning 7 games, but this is one we definitely win. this writer is pretty bias he should write for bleacher.DerekJohnson said:
Illinois is pathetic, who's their coach BTW. However, if this does turn out to be correct, this is the game the doogs finally understand sark's shit.
At that point you'll be hearing "Time to make a QB change" threads. "Sometimes you have to go backwards before you can go forwards", "This team was 0-12, Sark is a victim of his own success. This takes time", "Hey we are in on recruit X, when we land him that will change our program", etc.
Doogs won't give up on Sark until he's fired. Then they'll claim they always knew he wasn't the right coach.
-
Fetters said last year that "5 reasons jumped the shark 4 years ago". Fucking dipshit didn't realize the original Doogtarded version that Damone mocks every year was only 4 years old.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Yes that's always good. I still laugh thinking of when Fetters chimed in with "Has 5 reasons jumped the shark yet?"MikeDamone said:
Better yet yet, the doog who chimes in to let others know its a ruse, and a joke.He_Needs_More_Time said:
5 reasons has been funny for over 23 times. I love seeing fan reactions who take it seriously.MikeDamone said:In a few weeks i will have 5 reason to share with Illinois fans why the huskies will win rather easily. Say, 34-17?
Better yet is the Doogs who take it seriously and "agree".
Fetters is just a fat, bitter asshole. -
Huh?CheersWestDawg said:
Fetters said last year that "5 reasons jumped the shark 4 years ago". Fucking dipshit didn't realize the original Doogtarded version that Damone mocks every year was only 4 years old.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Yes that's always good. I still laugh thinking of when Fetters chimed in with "Has 5 reasons jumped the shark yet?"MikeDamone said:
Better yet yet, the doog who chimes in to let others know its a ruse, and a joke.He_Needs_More_Time said:
5 reasons has been funny for over 23 times. I love seeing fan reactions who take it seriously.MikeDamone said:In a few weeks i will have 5 reason to share with Illinois fans why the huskies will win rather easily. Say, 34-17?
Better yet is the Doogs who take it seriously and "agree".
Fetters is just a fat, bitter asshole.
-
That article is a joke....Illinois is gonna get smoked.
Wait.....5 reasons aren't real??? -
Oh, they're REAL alrightHuskyJW said:That article is a joke....Illinois is gonna get smoked.
Wait.....5 reasons aren't real???
-
What is the avg weight of our line this year?
-
IrishDawg22 said:
What is the avg weight of our line this year?
Do they have the attitude?
Are they ready to rumble? -
332 pounds...They have the attitude and they're ready to rumble.IrishDawg22 said:What is the avg weight of our line this year?
-
allcryinallillini's silence in this thread speaks volumes.
-
I hear they have a real nasty streakdtd said:IrishDawg22 said:What is the avg weight of our line this year?
Do they have the attitude?
Are they ready to rumble? -
You can't expect UW to compete at that elevation.
-
I would hope for a loss. You don't want to waste one of the seven wins on Illinois.dhdawg said:
we are only winning 7 games, but this is one we definitely win. this writer is pretty bias he should write for bleacher.DerekJohnson said:
Illinois is pathetic, who's their coach BTW. However, if this does turn out to be correct, this is the game the doogs finally understand sark's shit. -
I can't ever root for a UW loss. Regardless of how pissed I am at the administration, coaches, our fucktarded fan base I still can't bring myself to rooting for a loss.greenblood said:
I would hope for a loss. You don't want to waste one of the seven wins on Illinois.dhdawg said:
we are only winning 7 games, but this is one we definitely win. this writer is pretty bias he should write for bleacher.DerekJohnson said:
Illinois is pathetic, who's their coach BTW. However, if this does turn out to be correct, this is the game the doogs finally understand sark's shit.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
![[Deleted User]](https://w0.vanillicon.com/0207c5b8d9863e3a221f61582bd6bfa3_100.png)
