Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Another leak
Comments
-
You mean washed it with a ragSFGbob said:
You’re right, he should have bleach bitted it and then you be defending it.HHusky said:
What force was used?SFGbob said:
Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.HHusky said:
You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.MelloDawg said:
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
"Force"?
Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it? -
Former Presidents are above the law potd.Goduckies said:
Because maybe he didn't agree to it and it is a process not you raid a former President...HHusky said:
What force was used?SFGbob said:
Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.HHusky said:
You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.MelloDawg said:
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
"Force"?
Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it? -
Dazzler actually had the gall to claim Hillary never lied to the public about her emails.Goduckies said:
You mean washed it with a ragSFGbob said:
You’re right, he should have bleach bitted it and then you be defending it.HHusky said:
What force was used?SFGbob said:
Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.HHusky said:
You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.MelloDawg said:
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
"Force"?
Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it? -
What? When did he lose his 4th ammendment rights?HHusky said:
Former Presidents are above the law potd.Goduckies said:
Because maybe he didn't agree to it and it is a process not you raid a former President...HHusky said:
What force was used?SFGbob said:
Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.HHusky said:
You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.MelloDawg said:
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
"Force"?
Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it? -
Madam, the 4th Amendment does not say you are only subject to search if you feel like it.Goduckies said:
What? When did he lose his 4th ammendment rights?HHusky said:
Former Presidents are above the law potd.Goduckies said:
Because maybe he didn't agree to it and it is a process not you raid a former President...HHusky said:
What force was used?SFGbob said:
Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.HHusky said:
You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.MelloDawg said:
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
"Force"?
Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it? -
SFGbob said:
Dazzler actually had the gall to claim Hillary never lied to the public about her emails.Goduckies said:
You mean washed it with a ragSFGbob said:
You’re right, he should have bleach bitted it and then you be defending it.HHusky said:
What force was used?SFGbob said:
Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.HHusky said:
You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.MelloDawg said:
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
"Force"?
Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it?
-
The FBI had the subpoena on June 19th when Trump let them have access. Do you ever get anything right?HHusky said:
What force was used?SFGbob said:
Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.HHusky said:
You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.MelloDawg said:
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
"Force"?
Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it? -
Things a Hillary cuck would poast.HHusky said:SFGbob said:
Dazzler actually had the gall to claim Hillary never lied to the public about her emails.Goduckies said:
You mean washed it with a ragSFGbob said:
You’re right, he should have bleach bitted it and then you be defending it.HHusky said:
What force was used?SFGbob said:
Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.HHusky said:
You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.MelloDawg said:
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
"Force"?
Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it? -
Why did Daddy still have the stuff taken on Monday?46XiJCAB said:
The FBI had the subpoena on June 19th when Trump let them have access. Do you ever get anything right?HHusky said:
What force was used?SFGbob said:
Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.HHusky said:
You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.MelloDawg said:
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
"Force"?
Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it? -
Correct but it establishes you from having a fishing expedition done to you like this... they violated that right because they found a sham judge.HHusky said:
Madam, the 4th Amendment does not say you are only subject to search if you feel like it.Goduckies said:
What? When did he lose his 4th ammendment rights?HHusky said:
Former Presidents are above the law potd.Goduckies said:
Because maybe he didn't agree to it and it is a process not you raid a former President...HHusky said:
What force was used?SFGbob said:
Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.HHusky said:
You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.MelloDawg said:
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
"Force"?
Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it? -
We need to see the Affidavit/probable cause statement they used to get this warrant.MelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic. -
Just saw a local news report on the FBI Mar-a-Lago raid. They might as well put Trump in prison tonight.
He was in possession of highly classified documents. Document meant to be stored in a secured facility. Possession of these documents a possible violation of the espionage act.
Of course all of the tape they ran was of Corrupt Media piling on. When you play Ben Rhodes talking about Trump’s time is up, you know it’s lying time. -
Astonishingly and uncharacteristically correct.Sledog said:
We need to see the Affidavit/probable cause statement they used to get this warrant.MelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic. -
No warrants. Strange.
No two tiered justice system in our country.
-
No doubt Dazzler is now declaring victory.HHusky said:SFGbob said:
Dazzler actually had the gall to claim Hillary never lied to the public about her emails.Goduckies said:
You mean washed it with a ragSFGbob said:
You’re right, he should have bleach bitted it and then you be defending it.HHusky said:
What force was used?SFGbob said:
Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.HHusky said:
You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.MelloDawg said:
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
"Force"?
Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it?
Care to address your pathetic knee padding lie Dazzler? -
Because the warrant let them take anything they wanted. Imagine sucking the Stassi cock of the Biden admin that wrote and processed a warrant the allowed the government to take anything they wantedHHusky said:
Why did Daddy still have the stuff taken on Monday?46XiJCAB said:
The FBI had the subpoena on June 19th when Trump let them have access. Do you ever get anything right?HHusky said:
What force was used?SFGbob said:
Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.HHusky said:
You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.MelloDawg said:
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
"Force"?
Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it? -
Comey said it was okay. Dazzler was satisfied. He believes in Laws.Sledog said:
No warrants. Strange.
No two tiered justice system in our country. -
Actual quote from FBI raider. “Don’t forget Melania’s closet.”SFGbob said:
Because the warrant let them take anything they wanted. Imagine sucking the Stassi cock of the Biden admin that wrote and processed a warrant the allowed the government to take anything they wantedHHusky said:
Why did Daddy still have the stuff taken on Monday?46XiJCAB said:
The FBI had the subpoena on June 19th when Trump let them have access. Do you ever get anything right?HHusky said:
What force was used?SFGbob said:
Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.HHusky said:
You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.MelloDawg said:
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
"Force"?
Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it?
Not a fishing expedition. -
I heard they knew exactly what they were looking for. In Melania’s closet.SFGbob said:
Because the warrant let them take anything they wanted. Imagine sucking the Stassi cock of the Biden admin that wrote and processed a warrant the allowed the government to take anything they wantedHHusky said:
Why did Daddy still have the stuff taken on Monday?46XiJCAB said:
The FBI had the subpoena on June 19th when Trump let them have access. Do you ever get anything right?HHusky said:
What force was used?SFGbob said:
Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.HHusky said:
You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.MelloDawg said:
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
"Force"?
Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it? -
46XiJCAB said:
I heard they knew exactly what they were looking for. In Melania’s closet.SFGbob said:
Because the warrant let them take anything they wanted. Imagine sucking the Stassi cock of the Biden admin that wrote and processed a warrant the allowed the government to take anything they wantedHHusky said:
Why did Daddy still have the stuff taken on Monday?46XiJCAB said:
The FBI had the subpoena on June 19th when Trump let them have access. Do you ever get anything right?HHusky said:
What force was used?SFGbob said:
Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.HHusky said:
You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.MelloDawg said:
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
"Force"?
Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it?
-
She's the mole.46XiJCAB said:
I heard they knew exactly what they were looking for. In Melania’s closet.SFGbob said:
Because the warrant let them take anything they wanted. Imagine sucking the Stassi cock of the Biden admin that wrote and processed a warrant the allowed the government to take anything they wantedHHusky said:
Why did Daddy still have the stuff taken on Monday?46XiJCAB said:
The FBI had the subpoena on June 19th when Trump let them have access. Do you ever get anything right?HHusky said:
What force was used?SFGbob said:
Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.HHusky said:
You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.MelloDawg said:
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
"Force"?
Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it? -
I thought this was going to be a thread about Joe shitting his pants again.46XiJCAB said:Apparently 20 boxes taken and contents leaked to the WSJ.
Get ready this is where they finally get Trump.
Again.
