Left is now outraged at Trump for releasing warrant

"He didn't redact the names of the FBI agents on the warrant."
"He must be stopped."
"He's put a target on their back."
Kavanaugh says, "hold my beer."
Comments
-
Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?
Honest question.
My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.
Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.
-
Thud!
-
They are scared, they overreached like they always do. Biden has in one term lost two wars and angry parents are about to purge green haired teachers from their kid’s schools. Wait until the Covid and Trans trials start …
-
PurpleThrobber said:
Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?
Honest question.
My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.
Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.
So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?HHusky said:Thud!
It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.
Fuck off.
-
Thud!
you miss the pointPurpleThrobber said:PurpleThrobber said:Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?
Honest question.
My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.
Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.
So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?HHusky said:Thud!
It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.
Fuck off.
imagine my surprise -
And that's another Throbber first down.HHusky said:Thud!
you miss the pointPurpleThrobber said:PurpleThrobber said:Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?
Honest question.
My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.
Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.
So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?HHusky said:Thud!
It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.
Fuck off.
imagine my surprise
-
What I love is that the raid had nothing to do about January 6th or IRS allegations. But rather the possession of classified information of a past president. This is already backfiring in a shocking way.
-
congratsPurpleThrobber said:
And that's another Throbber first down.HHusky said:Thud!
you miss the pointPurpleThrobber said:PurpleThrobber said:Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?
Honest question.
My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.
Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.
So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?HHusky said:Thud!
It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.
Fuck off.
imagine my surprise -
They had zero probable cause for Jan 6th to get a warrant but if they somehow "find" something.... how did that get there...greenblood said:What I love is that the raid had nothing to do about January 6th or IRS allegations. But rather the possession of classified information of a past president. This is already backfiring in a shocking way.
-
Go work on your Russian state narrative homework, Dazzler.HHusky said:
congratsPurpleThrobber said:
And that's another Throbber first down.HHusky said:Thud!
you miss the pointPurpleThrobber said:PurpleThrobber said:Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?
Honest question.
My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.
Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.
So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?HHusky said:Thud!
It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.
Fuck off.
imagine my surprise
-
congratsPurpleThrobber said:
And that's another Throbber first down.HHusky said:Thud!
you miss the pointPurpleThrobber said:PurpleThrobber said:Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?
Honest question.
My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.
Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.
So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?HHusky said:Thud!
It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.
Fuck off.
imagine my surprise
I'll wait for you to get your ammo.PurpleThrobber said:
Go work on your Russian state narrative homework, Dazzler.HHusky said:
congratsPurpleThrobber said:
And that's another Throbber first down.HHusky said:Thud!
you miss the pointPurpleThrobber said:PurpleThrobber said:Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?
Honest question.
My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.
Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.
So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?HHusky said:Thud!
It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.
Fuck off.
imagine my surprise
I'm sporting that way. -
Your homework is six months past due.HHusky said:
congratsPurpleThrobber said:
And that's another Throbber first down.HHusky said:Thud!
you miss the pointPurpleThrobber said:PurpleThrobber said:Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?
Honest question.
My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.
Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.
So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?HHusky said:Thud!
It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.
Fuck off.
imagine my surprise
I'll wait for you to get your ammo.PurpleThrobber said:
Go work on your Russian state narrative homework, Dazzler.HHusky said:
congratsPurpleThrobber said:
And that's another Throbber first down.HHusky said:Thud!
you miss the pointPurpleThrobber said:PurpleThrobber said:Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?
Honest question.
My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.
Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.
So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?HHusky said:Thud!
It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.
Fuck off.
imagine my surprise
I'm sporting that way.
Fuck off.
-
Weird how Dazzler can never give us the explanation for that.PurpleThrobber said:
Go work on your Russian state narrative homework, Dazzler.HHusky said:
congratsPurpleThrobber said:
And that's another Throbber first down.HHusky said:Thud!
you miss the pointPurpleThrobber said:PurpleThrobber said:Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?
Honest question.
My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.
Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.
So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?HHusky said:Thud!
It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.
Fuck off.
imagine my surprise
It’s as if Dazzler is no different than the moron in the video talking about how Trump needs to be in jail for all the provable crimes he has committed and then when asked to list those “crimes” he loses his voice -
I'm gonna go check out those nuclear documents on my phone.SFGbob said:
Weird how Dazzler can never give us the explanation for that.PurpleThrobber said:
Go work on your Russian state narrative homework, Dazzler.HHusky said:
congratsPurpleThrobber said:
And that's another Throbber first down.HHusky said:Thud!
you miss the pointPurpleThrobber said:PurpleThrobber said:Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?
Honest question.
My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.
Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.
So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?HHusky said:Thud!
It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.
Fuck off.
imagine my surprise
It’s as if Dazzler is no different than the moron in the video talking about how Trump needs to be in jail for all the provable crimes he has committed and then when asked to list those “crimes” he loses his voice
It's no big deal! -
The declassified ones?HHusky said:
I'm gonna go check out those nuclear documents on my phone.SFGbob said:
Weird how Dazzler can never give us the explanation for that.PurpleThrobber said:
Go work on your Russian state narrative homework, Dazzler.HHusky said:
congratsPurpleThrobber said:
And that's another Throbber first down.HHusky said:Thud!
you miss the pointPurpleThrobber said:PurpleThrobber said:Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?
Honest question.
My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.
Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.
So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?HHusky said:Thud!
It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.
Fuck off.
imagine my surprise
It’s as if Dazzler is no different than the moron in the video talking about how Trump needs to be in jail for all the provable crimes he has committed and then when asked to list those “crimes” he loses his voice
It's no big deal! -
You should be more concerned with the Chinese owning the Big Guy.46XiJCAB said:
The declassified ones?HHusky said:
I'm gonna go check out those nuclear documents on my phone.SFGbob said:
Weird how Dazzler can never give us the explanation for that.PurpleThrobber said:
Go work on your Russian state narrative homework, Dazzler.HHusky said:
congratsPurpleThrobber said:
And that's another Throbber first down.HHusky said:Thud!
you miss the pointPurpleThrobber said:PurpleThrobber said:Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?
Honest question.
My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.
Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.
So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?HHusky said:Thud!
It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.
Fuck off.
imagine my surprise
It’s as if Dazzler is no different than the moron in the video talking about how Trump needs to be in jail for all the provable crimes he has committed and then when asked to list those “crimes” he loses his voice
It's no big deal! -
Come see Herr Dazzler struggle in every thread. He hasn’t struggled this badly since yesterday.
-
Exactly.PurpleThrobber said:Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?
Honest question.
My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.
Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.
Which group endorses the Red Guard tactics and online Pogroms? The Right?
Or the mother-fucking, scum-sucking Left, who only attack in mobs because every last one of them is an intellectual lightweight (See @HHusky) and a fucking pussy who can't throw a punch because their fathers abandoned them from sheer embarrassment without teaching them to fight.
Fuck Off Faggy Libs.