Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Another leak
Comments
-
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc -
You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.MelloDawg said:
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
"Force"? -
MustHHusky said:
You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.MelloDawg said:
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
"Force"?
Defend
EVERYTHING -
ironicRaceBannon said:
MustHHusky said:
You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.MelloDawg said:
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
"Force"?
Defend
EVERYTHING -
Serve the rest of the living presidents. Lay it out there for all to see.
Or hide like bitches behind the deep state.
-
ahhhh, deep state made Daddy do it.PurpleThrobber said:Serve the rest of the living presidents. Lay it out there for all to see.
Or hide like bitches behind the deep state. -
Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.HHusky said:
You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.MelloDawg said:
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
"Force"?
Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process. -
What force was used?SFGbob said:
Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.HHusky said:
You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.MelloDawg said:
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
"Force"?
Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it? -
Because maybe he didn't agree to it and it is a process not you raid a former President...HHusky said:
What force was used?SFGbob said:
Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.HHusky said:
You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.MelloDawg said:
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
"Force"?
Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it? -
You’re right, he should have bleach bitted it and then you be defending it.HHusky said:
What force was used?SFGbob said:
Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.HHusky said:
You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.MelloDawg said:
I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.SFGbob said:
There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support itMelloDawg said:
What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”SFGbob said:
No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.MelloDawg said:
Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?46XiJCAB said:
Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.SFGbob said:
Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.
Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.
Banana Republic.
I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
"Force"?
Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it?
