Left is now outraged at Trump for releasing warrant
"He didn't redact the names of the FBI agents on the warrant."
"He must be stopped."
"He's put a target on their back."
Kavanaugh says, "hold my beer."
Comments
-
Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?
Honest question.
My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.
Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.
-
Thud!
-
They are scared, they overreached like they always do. Biden has in one term lost two wars and angry parents are about to purge green haired teachers from their kid’s schools. Wait until the Covid and Trans trials start …
-
PurpleThrobber said:
Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?
Honest question.
My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.
Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.
So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?HHusky said:Thud!
It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.
Fuck off.
-
Thud!
you miss the pointPurpleThrobber said:PurpleThrobber said:Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?
Honest question.
My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.
Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.
So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?HHusky said:Thud!
It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.
Fuck off.
imagine my surprise -
And that's another Throbber first down.HHusky said:Thud!
you miss the pointPurpleThrobber said:PurpleThrobber said:Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?
Honest question.
My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.
Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.
So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?HHusky said:Thud!
It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.
Fuck off.
imagine my surprise
-
What I love is that the raid had nothing to do about January 6th or IRS allegations. But rather the possession of classified information of a past president. This is already backfiring in a shocking way.
-
congratsPurpleThrobber said:
And that's another Throbber first down.HHusky said:Thud!
you miss the pointPurpleThrobber said:PurpleThrobber said:Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?
Honest question.
My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.
Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.
So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?HHusky said:Thud!
It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.
Fuck off.
imagine my surprise -
They had zero probable cause for Jan 6th to get a warrant but if they somehow "find" something.... how did that get there...greenblood said:What I love is that the raid had nothing to do about January 6th or IRS allegations. But rather the possession of classified information of a past president. This is already backfiring in a shocking way.
-
Go work on your Russian state narrative homework, Dazzler.HHusky said:
congratsPurpleThrobber said:
And that's another Throbber first down.HHusky said:Thud!
you miss the pointPurpleThrobber said:PurpleThrobber said:Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?
Honest question.
My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.
Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.
So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?HHusky said:Thud!
It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.
Fuck off.
imagine my surprise
