Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
#OurJoeKent
Comments
-
I am the original better of the Field, thank you.LoneStarDawg said:I understand Damone likes to play the odds and bet the field like iDawg, it’s just a bitch move to think the best move is to appease. Forcing these mentally broken people to go down with their ideological ship is an obligation of sane people. Controlled opposition RINOs are a bigger problem than the left.
-
Glad you acknowledge it's a bitch move.MelloDawg said:
Not that it is new information, but still.
-
I already answered your questionMikeDamone said: -
It’s the best bet a person can make in golf.pawz said:
Not that it is new information, but still. -
Imagine getting a sandy vag and being an angry cunt someone suggests that the far right candidate won't do as well in the 3rd as the incumbent. Your dumb ass is acting like I'm going to die for the dem. Fuck offLoneStarDawg said:
@DerekJohnson is even being a cunt here as well. He's usually more measured and avoids emotional reasoning and logical fallacies. Seems like suggesting a far right platform won't appeal to a purple district is a bridge to far.
As I said. My friend who was spent 5 decades in GOP party leadership. Is an attorney (a real one) and handicaps elections as a hobby sates that given that Trump was +5 vs. Biden, he thinks Kent won't do as well against the dem but will still win. The dems are doing much better down ballot. And neither of them will hold their seat in 2026.
But I guess just stating that is a bitch move trying to appease. Some of you have lost your fucking minds. -
populist with no corporate PAC support != far right
And I recall you stating he’d lose and Kevin McCarthy can’t afford to lose a RINO in his controlled opposition grift -
Joe Kent isn’t Trump and isn’t far right. Trump lost the suburban white women in Vancouver. Kent won’t. His demeanor and delivery are much more palatable.MikeDamone said:
@DerekJohnson is even being a cunt here as well. He's usually more measured and avoids emotional reasoning and logical fallacies. Seems like suggesting a far right platform won't appeal to a purple district is a bridge to far.
As I said. My friend who was spent 5 decades in GOP party leadership. Is an attorney (a real one) and handicaps elections as a hobby sates that given that Trump was +5 vs. Biden, he thinks Kent won't do as well against the dem but will still win. The dems are doing much better down ballot. And neither of them will hold their seat in 2026.
But I guess just stating that is a bitch move trying to appease. Some of you have lost your fucking minds.
It may be close because PDX carpetbaggers keep flooding the area. I won’t be making any bold predictions for 2026.
The only person filled with emotion here seems to be you. You’ve attacked me for defending Kent and pointing out the smears against a honorable vet.
I’ve not come at you once. Take a breath man. -
You're taking my critique very personally. As if you think I'm lashing out at you.MikeDamone said:
@DerekJohnson is even being a cunt here as well. He's usually more measured and avoids emotional reasoning and logical fallacies. Seems like suggesting a far right platform won't appeal to a purple district is a bridge to far.
As I said. My friend who was spent 5 decades in GOP party leadership. Is an attorney (a real one) and handicaps elections as a hobby sates that given that Trump was +5 vs. Biden, he thinks Kent won't do as well against the dem but will still win. The dems are doing much better down ballot. And neither of them will hold their seat in 2026.
But I guess just stating that is a bitch move trying to appease. Some of you have lost your fucking minds.
I merely stated that Trump could absolutely win it all if he gets the nomination. There is a massive backlash toward the Dems and Trump has much support. You stated that if Trump gets the nomination it will lead to a Dem victory in 2024. I have my opinion and you have yours. You said let's bet on the prez election (if he ends up with the nomination), and I said sure no problem, we can bet. -
Well, you did make it personalDerekJohnson said:
I merely stated that Trump could absolutely win it all if he gets the nomination. There is a massive backlash toward the Dems and Trump has much support. You stated that if Trump gets the nomination it will lead to a Dem victory in 2024. I have my opinion and you have yours. You said let's bet on the prez election (if he ends up with the nomination), and I said sure no problem, we can bet.
-
Why did you and lone star get upset and feel the need to "defend" Kent.46XiJCAB said:
It may be close because PDX carpetbaggers keep flooding the area. I won’t be making any bold predictions for 2026.
The only person filled with emotion here seems to be you. You’ve attacked me for defending Kent and pointing out the smears against a honorable vet.
I’ve not come at you once. Take a breath man.
Whether or not he's far right isn't the question. That's the perception. He is widely seen here as just that. My original and main point is it will be a closer race if kent is the candidate. I'm not sure why that made some of you lose your shit to the point of saying if not Kent then you'd rather have then dem and lone star saying the dem would be a one term representative. Which is likely untrue looking at the past if the 3rd as well as future forecast.
I'll leave you with what my friend sent me. He's more knowledgeable than any one here about it.
-
Defending Kent against the smears of establishment GOP PAC's is getting upset? Come on man. By the tim Kent is running for his 3rd term, if he pulls this thing out, I'll be living in a reliable red state. Until then I want him as my Rep.MikeDamone said:
Whether or not he's far right isn't the question. That's the perception. He is widely seen here as just that. My original and main point is it will be a closer race if kent is the candidate. I'm not sure why that made some of you lose your shit to the point of saying if not Kent then you'd rather have then dem and lone star saying the dem would be a one term representative. Which is likely untrue looking at the past if the 3rd as well as future forecast.
I'll leave you with what my friend sent me. He's more knowledgeable than any one here about it.
I've supported JHB in every campaign she's run except this one. Her vote for the J6th Committee helped to put a 69 y/o grandmother with cancer in prison for 2 months for walking into our Capitol. We're just supposed to ignore that? Naw. That's also why I defend Kent because he would have never cast that vote. -
This is an impressive way to spin that day.46XiJCAB said:
I've supported JHB in every campaign she's run except this one. Her vote for the J6th Committee helped to put a 69 y/o grandmother with cancer in prison for 2 months for walking into our Capitol. We're just supposed to ignore that? Naw. That's also why I defend Kent because he would have never cast that vote. -
We're not talking about "that day" you dumbass. This is about ONE woman who walked in with others, was identified, and is not sitting in prison for two months. For trespassing. If you can't see that that is wrong, then you're a POS and part of the problem.MelloDawg said: -
And JHB voted to jail only her? Sounds like a pretty specific line item to put in a bill.46XiJCAB said: -
You mean other than the impressive way the FBI and the MSM are spinning that day?MelloDawg said:
Centrist my ass.
-
Well, I wasn’t there that day so I can’t speak to what really happened. Do you have a first hand account?pawz said:
Centrist my ass. -
Try watching all the cell phone video that was banned from social media and ignored by the MSM. Revolver.news has quite a bit of it on hand to peruse.MelloDawg said:
-
MelloDawg said:
Run and hide in your lukewarmness, "centrist". You know not neither the time or day of your reckoning.
-
Perhaps I shall. I’m all in favor of equal time and balanced accounting of the facts.pawz said: -
Yes. Upset. As in it stuck a nerve. My point isn't who you want or who I want. I'm just looking at the district demographics and tends and making some predictions. You're making an argument for Kent when that's not what the conversation is even about. Kent doesn't need to be defended here. My friend nailed it and I posted what he said. You got emotional and upset and started going on about Sark and 7-6. JFC.46XiJCAB said:
I've supported JHB in every campaign she's run except this one. Her vote for the J6th Committee helped to put a 69 y/o grandmother with cancer in prison for 2 months for walking into our Capitol. We're just supposed to ignore that? Naw. That's also why I defend Kent because he would have never cast that vote. -
MelloDawg said:
Are you? We shall see.
The best part of these articles is not having to rely on punditry alone, it's the numerous videos for one to see for themselves with their own two eyes.
Apologies to @GrandpaSankey
https://www.revolver.news/2021/10/meet-ray-epps-the-fed-protected-provocateur-who-appears-to-have-led-the-very-first-1-6-attack-on-the-u-s-capitol/
https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/
-
Yeah but....pawz said:
Are you? We shall see.
The best part of these articles is not having to rely on punditry alone, it's the numerous videos for one to see for themselves with their own two eyes.
Apologies to @GrandpaSankey
https://www.revolver.news/2021/10/meet-ray-epps-the-fed-protected-provocateur-who-appears-to-have-led-the-very-first-1-6-attack-on-the-u-s-capitol/
https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/
CASES!!!
-
She never thought about the overarching consequences of her vote. She was appealing to dumbfuck voters like you. HTH.MelloDawg said: -
This is happening whoever is in WA-03 seat -
I never mentioned Sark. Get your story straight. You’re slipping. Upvotes from @MelloDouche and Haie are the tell.MikeDamone said:
Tim for you to recalibrate. This is about Kent and the GOP establishment wanting desperately to defeat a Trump endorsed candidate.
Hell, they’ll probably fund the DIM candidate if Kent pulls this out. You talk about the future as if the GOP gives a shit. It’s all about controlling their caucus. They won’t be able to control Kent. -
If doing the right thing had no negative consequences, even you girls might start doing the right thing.46XiJCAB said: -
You and lone star are having a completely different argument against a point I didn't make and have put together a nice strawman to go after. Enjoy46XiJCAB said:
Tim for you to recalibrate. This is about Kent and the GOP establishment wanting desperately to defeat a Trump endorsed candidate.
Hell, they’ll probably fund the DIM candidate if Kent pulls this out. You talk about the future as if the GOP gives a shit. It’s all about controlling their caucus. They won’t be able to control Kent.
It was lone star who made the stupid Sark comment. -
Naw. This started when you called me a snowflake and emotional for defending Kent. Then the BidenBros shit.MikeDamone said:
It was lone star who made the stupid Sark comment.
I never did any of that. I kept my comments about Kent, JHB, GOP establishment smears and her votes. That’s it.
You started the name calling. -
I took my $25 in business and Joe Kent shirt to Home Depot just to spite Damone’s employer -
You guys realize there are titties in the Wam, right?