Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
We need a general tweet of the day thread
Comments
-
-
This is why the weatherman always says temperatures may be lower in outlying areas. Much of the supposed increase in average daily temperatures in the US are because of higher night time temperatures. The urban heat island effect is real and our government doesn't care about corrupt temperature data because it supports the global warming climate fraud. Sort of like the government commitment to honest elections and to the SCIENCE of a pandemic response.
https://ace.mu.nu/
I heard from the folks over at The Heartland Institute who informed me that they were about to release a major research report showing just how badly corrupted NOAA’s weather stations are. That report was published two days ago. Here is a link to the story at their website.
This is a link to the actual report: “Corrupted Climate Stations: The Official U.S. Temperature Record Remains Fatally Flawed
In Heartland’s own words, “Official NOAA temperature stations produce corrupted data due to purposeful placement in man-made hot spots.”
Just how flawed are NOAA’s weather stations?
This report finds approximately 96 percent of U.S. temperature stations fail to meet what the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) considers to be “acceptable,” uncorrupted placement. These findings strongly undermine the legitimacy and the magnitude of the official consensus on long-term climate warming trends.
So just what measurements is Heartland using to discern that the stations don’t meet NOAA’s guidelines? They used NOAA’s own Site Information Handbook.
More from Heartland’s report:
The report was compiled via satellite and in-person survey visits to NOAA weather stations that contribute to the “official” land temperature data in the United States. The research shows that 96% of these stations are corrupted by localized effects of urbanization – producing heat-bias because of their close proximity to asphalt, machinery, and other heat-producing, heat-trapping, or heat-accentuating objects. Placing temperature stations in such locations violates NOAA’s own published standards and strongly undermines the legitimacy and the magnitude of the official consensus on long-term climate warming trends in the United States.
Yeah, it’s hard to put much faith in “climate science” when government-funded climate scientists willingly use corrupted data to produce the result they want. (Or to be more specific, to produce the result they are being paid to produce.)
“With a 96 percent warm-bias in U.S. temperature measurements, it is impossible to use any statistical methods to derive an accurate climate trend for the U.S.” said Heartland Institute Senior Fellow Anthony Watts, the director of the study.
The report is actually a follow-up to a report done in 2009, which proved quite embarrassing to the climate community. As documented in this new report, some of the most egregious stations they reported on in 2009 were subsequently closed or moved by NOAA. But as shown in this picture from Cody, Wyoming, NOAA didn’t put much effort into improving the quality of the sites. This one was moved from atop a concrete dam to an asphalt parking lot.
Despite a few changes in locations, NOAA’s overall station placements have gotten much worse.
There are an abundance of photos showing weather stations that are obviously not reliable due to how they are situated, but the report also does the scientific work that NOAA apparently won’t do, grading these flawed stations using NOAA’s own guidelines. They fail consistently.
Here is just one example from Arco, Idaho. The temperature station is on a tiny strip of weeds between a parking lot and a sunlit wall. Below this photo is an infrared photo showing the captured heat of the building. Don’t forget that retained heat in the building doesn’t just affect high temps, it also inflates daily lows as the building releases its warmth overnight.
Take a look at this weather station, which sits at the top of a sunlit rock wall in Colfax, CA. Those rocks are holding a lot of heat. And get this, this weather station formerly sat in a grass field at this firehouse, but during a building renovation the weather station was moved to this corrupted site.
-
I drove to Chandler to visit snowbird family once. I had to leave at 5:30 am. The temp. dropped 10 degrees once I got outside of town and into farmland. There wasn't a major elevation change (probably 300-400 feet less). I really questioned where all the global warming data is coming from. Say that in mixed company and you're a right wing rube according to fags like Hhusky though.
-
Weather really should be taken among many stations. Relying on 1 station for municipalities is ridiculous and the number of weather stations that dot the landscape are many. Any meteorologist worth their salt will tell you placement of weather stations has an impact.
-
Back in the day you took the official temperature in the shade. Direct sun was a no no for obvious reasons
Now not so much -
-
Fighting climate fascism is the issue of our day
I'll keep saying it until everyone gets it -
Climate is just one avenue. There's plenty of others.RaceBannon said:Fighting all fascism is the issue of our day
I'll keep saying it until everyone gets it -
But climate is so versatileUW_Doog_Bot said:
Climate is just one avenue. There's plenty of others.RaceBannon said:Fighting all fascism is the issue of our day
I'll keep saying it until everyone gets it -
Sure, but I see a lot less religious fervor and compliance when compared to the Covid Cult.RaceBannon said:
But climate is so versatileUW_Doog_Bot said:
Climate is just one avenue. There's plenty of others.RaceBannon said:Fighting all fascism is the issue of our day
I'll keep saying it until everyone gets it
One more lab made virus release and we are either in fascism or civil war.
If you think they don't have round 2 tee'd up...





