Slow news day, ladies?
Comments
-
lol
Fuck off -
Brett Baier pretends like being under oath when you're testifying against Trump in this hearing matters. Is this guy really that fucking stupid or is he that in the tank to help take Trump down? Or is he still ass hurt over the onscreen murder that Lake committed on him after he brought up the BS claims of the Drag Queen in AZ.RaceBannon said: -
Jake Tapper is asking questions of Rep. Raskin, the guy who tried to stop the certification of electors in 2016, about Trump's "attack" on secret service agents. Clearly he has no dog in the hunt. These corrupt media DIM operatives don't even hide it anymore.RaceBannon said: -
Didn't Raskin doctor some tweets at the rushed impeachment trial?46XiJCAB said:
Jake Tapper is asking questions of Rep. Raskin, the guy who tried to stop the certification of electors in 2016, about Trump's "attack" on secret service agents. Clearly he has no dog in the hunt. These corrupt media DIM operatives don't even hide it anymore.RaceBannon said: -
The definition of hearsay. And hh the lawyer believes in and posts every word of it as if it were fact.
And that is what hh based his post on.
Pathetic. -
Yes, caught and admitted it. But you can trust him on this. Isn't it interesting that they waited weeks before they had to scrape the bottom of the barrel with this gal to create "jaw-dropping" testimony. Yes the hearings have been so riveting that they kept the really good stuff until now. What a fucking joke.Bob_C said:
Didn't Raskin doctor some tweets at the rushed impeachment trial?46XiJCAB said:
Jake Tapper is asking questions of Rep. Raskin, the guy who tried to stop the certification of electors in 2016, about Trump's "attack" on secret service agents. Clearly he has no dog in the hunt. These corrupt media DIM operatives don't even hide it anymore.RaceBannon said: -
Yes.46XiJCAB said:
Brett Baier pretends like being under oath when you're testifying against Trump in this hearing matters. Is this guy really that fucking stupid or is he that in the tank to help take Trump down? Or is he still ass hurt over the onscreen murder that Lake committed on him after he brought up the BS claims of the Drag Queen in AZ.RaceBannon said: -
Schiff said he had personal knowledge of Trump's Russian collusion. Then he didn't.Bob_C said:
Didn't Raskin doctor some tweets at the rushed impeachment trial?46XiJCAB said:
Jake Tapper is asking questions of Rep. Raskin, the guy who tried to stop the certification of electors in 2016, about Trump's "attack" on secret service agents. Clearly he has no dog in the hunt. These corrupt media DIM operatives don't even hide it anymore.RaceBannon said: -
That one needs to play out still. Lots of Trump receptiveness out there still on that topic.WestlinnDuck said:
Schiff said he had personal knowledge of Trump's Russian collusion. Then he didn't.Bob_C said:
Didn't Raskin doctor some tweets at the rushed impeachment trial?46XiJCAB said:
Jake Tapper is asking questions of Rep. Raskin, the guy who tried to stop the certification of electors in 2016, about Trump's "attack" on secret service agents. Clearly he has no dog in the hunt. These corrupt media DIM operatives don't even hide it anymore.RaceBannon said: -
He's such a a good guy that he just wanted to give her a chance to respond to the question, "when did you stop beating your children, Kari." What a pathetic attempt that was but then Brett is still ass chapped over the AZ call and being consistently called out by Lake. He was once a pretty middle of the road guy but not where anything Trump is involved. He likes those DC cocktail party invites too much.WestlinnDuck said:
Yes.46XiJCAB said:
Brett Baier pretends like being under oath when you're testifying against Trump in this hearing matters. Is this guy really that fucking stupid or is he that in the tank to help take Trump down? Or is he still ass hurt over the onscreen murder that Lake committed on him after he brought up the BS claims of the Drag Queen in AZ.RaceBannon said: -
Heard it from a friend whoWestlinnDuck said:
Schiff said he had personal knowledge of Trump's Russian collusion. Then he didn't.Bob_C said:
Didn't Raskin doctor some tweets at the rushed impeachment trial?46XiJCAB said:
Jake Tapper is asking questions of Rep. Raskin, the guy who tried to stop the certification of electors in 2016, about Trump's "attack" on secret service agents. Clearly he has no dog in the hunt. These corrupt media DIM operatives don't even hide it anymore.RaceBannon said:
Heard it from a friend who
Heard it from another....
-
-
And yet another hoax our resident speed-limit IQ @heilhusky fell for hook, line, and sinker because…well…Orange Man Bad.
And because he’s a sh!tty lawyer.
-
But of courseHoustonHusky said:And yet another hoax our resident speed-limit IQ @heilhusky fell for hook, line, and sinker because…well…Orange Man Bad.
And because he’s a sh!tty lawyer.
-
The growing list of people that the Scammittee will never call to testify. That's why this whole thing is a joke. Gen. Milley said Trump never called on J6th about NG support, but the scammittee didn't bother to say that Trump authorized NG troops before J6th. Sounds like a guy planning a coup.HoustonHusky said:And yet another hoax our resident speed-limit IQ @heilhusky fell for hook, line, and sinker because…well…Orange Man Bad.
And because he’s a sh!tty lawyer. -
He's guilty. Why would he throw a fucking plate of food against a wall?
-
Wasn't a top 5 revelation for HH though, so it's cool that he fell for another lie.HoustonHusky said:And yet another hoax our resident speed-limit IQ @heilhusky fell for hook, line, and sinker because…well…Orange Man Bad.
And because he’s a sh!tty lawyer. -
Keep the hearsay content but flip the parties and somehow, I imagine it’s a different analysis.
In the meantime, something something Ray Epps. -
Lol, no Cheney would ever make a claim without being able to back it up.
-
She obviously testified to some hearsay. This isn't a trial.
That said, she had firsthand knowledge:
1. that Daddy knew there were guns and other weapons in the crowd;
2. that Daddy knew these were his people, not Antifa, BLM, et al.;
3. that the violence was expected and desired by Daddy and his circle, days in advance of Jan. 6;
4. that Daddy did want to go to the Capitol to oversee his coup and intended to; and
5. that Daddy did not want the violence stopped (and hoped Pence might be found by the mob?).
-
Of course this proceeding doesn't allow for any cross examination of the witness by the defendant nor any defense counsel at all.Bendintheriver said:The definition of hearsay. And hh the lawyer believes in and posts every word of it as if it were fact.
And that is what hh based his post on.
Pathetic. -
You would never accuse a leftard of being intellectually incurious along with being a lying hack. Same intense desire to insure that we have a honest elections.MelloDawg said:Keep the hearsay content but flip the parties and somehow, I imagine it’s a different analysis.
In the meantime, something something Ray Epps. -
Putting Raskin and Schiff on the committee revealed it for the farce it is.WestlinnDuck said:
Schiff said he had personal knowledge of Trump's Russian collusion. Then he didn't.Bob_C said:
Didn't Raskin doctor some tweets at the rushed impeachment trial?46XiJCAB said:
Jake Tapper is asking questions of Rep. Raskin, the guy who tried to stop the certification of electors in 2016, about Trump's "attack" on secret service agents. Clearly he has no dog in the hunt. These corrupt media DIM operatives don't even hide it anymore.RaceBannon said: -
Tell us how she "knew" that Trump knew there were guns in the crowd Dazzler?HHusky said:She obviously testified to some hearsay. This isn't a trial.
That said, she had firsthand knowledge:
1. that Daddy knew there were guns and other weapons in the crowd;
2. that Daddy knew these were his people, not Antifa, BLM, et al.;
3. that the violence was expected and desired by Daddy and his circle, days in advance of Jan. 6;
4. that Daddy did want to go to the Capitol to oversee his coup and intended to; and
5. that Daddy did not want the violence stopped (and hoped Pence might be found by the mob?). -
And flip 10% for the Big Guy to Trump and Mueller would be called out of retirement. Did you have a point?MelloDawg said:Keep the hearsay content but flip the parties and somehow, I imagine it’s a different analysis.
In the meantime, something something Ray Epps.
Meanwhile normal Americans are pissed Biden is waging his war on carbon based energy at their expense. -
She was backstage at the rally.SFGbob said:
Tell us how she "knew" that Trump knew there were guns in the crowd Dazzler?HHusky said:She obviously testified to some hearsay. This isn't a trial.
That said, she had firsthand knowledge:
1. that Daddy knew there were guns and other weapons in the crowd;
2. that Daddy knew these were his people, not Antifa, BLM, et al.;
3. that the violence was expected and desired by Daddy and his circle, days in advance of Jan. 6;
4. that Daddy did want to go to the Capitol to oversee his coup and intended to; and
5. that Daddy did not want the violence stopped (and hoped Pence might be found by the mob?). -
You would think that an honest investigation might raise these point along with the hidden footage. I pity your mythical clients.HHusky said:She obviously testified to some hearsay. This isn't a trial.
That said, she had firsthand knowledge:
1. that Daddy knew there were guns and other weapons in the crowd; You think? Funny how none of them were used except for the fire extinguisher to kill Sicknick.
2. that Daddy knew these were his people, not Antifa, BLM, et al.; Because antifa and blm riots were okay? How many molotov cocktails were thrown to burn down the capitol? Who were the black clad dudes leading the charge into the Capitol
3. that the violence was expected and desired by Daddy and his circle, days in advance of Jan. 6;
4. that Daddy did want to go to the Capitol to oversee his coup and intended to; and Link? Funny if he wanted to go to the Capitol you would think he would have told the crowd to meet him there.
5. that Daddy did not want the violence stopped (and hoped Pence might be found by the mob?). Evidence? We know that Pelosi didn't want the Capitol secured and neither did the National Guard or the FBI and Ray Epps. Maybe he was "receptive" to Pence being found by the mob. Just no evidence. -
Well that fucking seals it!!!HHusky said:
She was backstage at the rally.SFGbob said:
Tell us how she "knew" that Trump knew there were guns in the crowd Dazzler?HHusky said:She obviously testified to some hearsay. This isn't a trial.
That said, she had firsthand knowledge:
1. that Daddy knew there were guns and other weapons in the crowd;
2. that Daddy knew these were his people, not Antifa, BLM, et al.;
3. that the violence was expected and desired by Daddy and his circle, days in advance of Jan. 6;
4. that Daddy did want to go to the Capitol to oversee his coup and intended to; and
5. that Daddy did not want the violence stopped (and hoped Pence might be found by the mob?).
Dazzler Ace attorney solves the case. -
Thin
Things a deranged lunatic would believe and poast. You need help. I’d say call a friend but we know you don’t have any. Unhinged.HHusky said:She obviously testified to some hearsay. This isn't a trial.
That said, she had firsthand knowledge:
1. that Daddy knew there were guns and other weapons in the crowd;
2. that Daddy knew these were his people, not Antifa, BLM, et al.;
3. that the violence was expected and desired by Daddy and his circle, days in advance of Jan. 6;
4. that Daddy did want to go to the Capitol to oversee his coup and intended to; and
5. that Daddy did not want the violence stopped (and hoped Pence might be found by the mob?).
And yet she wanted to work for Daddy in FL. -
Of course there was no defense counsel available to question the witness about how she "knew" all of these things. Dazzler likes his show trials.46XiJCAB said:Thin
Things a deranged lunatic would believe and poast. You need help. I’d say call a friend but we know you don’t have any. Unhinged.HHusky said:She obviously testified to some hearsay. This isn't a trial.
That said, she had firsthand knowledge:
1. that Daddy knew there were guns and other weapons in the crowd;
2. that Daddy knew these were his people, not Antifa, BLM, et al.;
3. that the violence was expected and desired by Daddy and his circle, days in advance of Jan. 6;
4. that Daddy did want to go to the Capitol to oversee his coup and intended to; and
5. that Daddy did not want the violence stopped (and hoped Pence might be found by the mob?).
And yet she wanted to work for Daddy in FL.
Weird how Trump "knew" there were guns and yet nobody was arrested with a gun and the only person shot with a gun was a Trump supporter and Dazzler cheered her shooting.
