Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Sussman trial is a fraud

124

Comments

  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    Recusal was requested? link?
    Fuck off.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,462
    trublue said:

    Answer the question.

    You alleged Sled lied about his court experience and called him a mall cop, you stupid ass. I know the truth.

    I’ve never been involved in a civil case . . . all criminal cases in federal court.

    You’ve never been involved in a criminal case as a lawyer.

    In my experience, each side can excuse a specified number of potential jurors. The rest of the questions posed by the judge are pretty standard.

    Please don’t call anyone else a liar or throw out pejoratives in an attempt to demean Sled’s hard work and public service; particularly when you don’t know him and have zero experience in criminal court.


    Since what you've described is jury selection in both civil and criminal matters, it is irrelevant that I have tried civil matters rather than criminal.

    Sled claimed that jurors are excused for cause for any reason under the Sun. That's bullshit.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,462
    46XiJCAB said:

    Fuck off.
    Don't be like that, PDX.
  • trubluetrublue Member Posts: 3,042
    HHusky said:

    Since what you've described is jury selection in both civil and criminal matters, it is irrelevant that I have tried civil matters rather than criminal.

    Sled claimed that jurors are excused for cause for any reason under the Sun. That's bullshit.
    One of the questions in the selection process:
    Do you know or have you had any contact with the prosecution team?

    Woman who attended the same wedding said she had met me.

    She was dismissed from the jury pool pronto.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,462
    edited May 2022
    trublue said:

    One of the questions in the selection process:
    Do you know or have you had any contact with the prosecution team?

    Woman who attended the same wedding said she had met me.

    She was dismissed from the jury pool pronto.
    First of all, she'd met you. That's a distinction right there.

    Are you really telling me she was dismissed for cause without being asked anything else?

  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 16,978 Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    Since what you've described is jury selection in both civil and criminal matters, it is irrelevant that I have tried civil matters rather than criminal.

    Sled claimed that jurors are excused for cause for any reason under the Sun. That's bullshit.
    Thank you. File that for later when Gertrude says otherwise.
  • trubluetrublue Member Posts: 3,042
    She was dismissed from the jury pool without follow-up questions.

    All potential jurors are asked about criminal records. One guy said he could be impartial despite his criminal record. When asked what he had been convicted of: Rioting outside the Federal Courthouse in Eugene after the Rodney King verdict.

  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,994 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Feel free to explain how jury selection in a criminal case differs from jury selection in a civil matter.
    Ever get the feeling the Dazzler doesn't want to answer questions about his lack of actual trial experience?

    Fortunately his evasive lack of responses tell us all we need to know.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,462

    Ever get the feeling the Dazzler doesn't want to answer questions about his lack of actual trial experience?

    Fortunately his evasive lack of responses tell us all we need to know.
    The vast majority of all cases never go to trial. And in the business/commercial arena, which I practice in, cases are more likely to be subject to arbitration by contract. I’ve arbitrated significantly more cases than I’ve tried.

    Nonetheless, I have tried probably 15-20 cases and have directly observed or been involved in many times that range of jury selections.

    I bow to your greater experience, of course.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    HHusky said:

    The vast majority of all cases never go to trial. And in the business/commercial arena, which I practice in, cases are more likely to be subject to arbitration by contract. I’ve arbitrated significantly more cases than I’ve tried.

    Nonetheless, I have tried probably 15-20 cases and have directly observed or been involved in many times that range of jury selections.

    I bow to your greater experience, of course.
    JFC ma'am. You should stop digging and take the L.

    The only people who tried to rig the 2016 election were the Dems with a phony dossier. The gaslighting has been epic. Interesting that CNN and MSNBC aren't covering the trail.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,181

    JFC ma'am. You should stop digging and take the L.

    The only people who tried to rig the 2016 election were the Dems with a phony dossier. The gaslighting has been epic. Interesting that CNN and MSNBC aren't covering the trail.
    NYTimes completely ignored Mook's testimony about Hillary signing off on pushing the bogus Alfa Bank story.
  • trubluetrublue Member Posts: 3,042
    edited May 2022
    HHusky said:

    The vast majority of all cases never go to trial. And in the business/commercial arena, which I practice in, cases are more likely to be subject to arbitration by contract. I’ve arbitrated significantly more cases than I’ve tried.

    Nonetheless, I have tried probably 15-20 cases and have directly observed or been involved in many times that range of jury selections.

    I bow to your greater experience, of course.
    “The vast majority of cases never go to trial . . .”

    No shit, Batman.

    BTW: We were discussing criminal prosecutions, NOT arbitration(s).

    Please explain the circumstances where you have directly observed or have been involved in many times that range (15-20) of jury selections in cases that were not yours.


  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,462
    edited May 2022
    trublue said:

    “The vast majority of cases never go to trial . . .”

    No shit, Batman.

    BTW: We were discussing criminal prosecution, NOT arbitration(s).
    Do I detect a lack of civility on your part after you expressly complained about my civility or lack thereof?

    The issue was jury selection. You have been free to state any reason why my experience selecting juries is not applicable to a criminal jury selection. You have chosen not to do so. I know why you haven't; so do you.
  • trubluetrublue Member Posts: 3,042
    HHusky said:

    You've obviously lied about your courtroom experience, Mall Cop.
    Now that it’s been established you know little, if anything, about the practice of criminal law in state or federal court, how about apologizing to the retired Peace Officer, you blowhard?
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,462
    trublue said:

    Now that it’s been established you know little, if anything, about the practice of criminal law in state or federal court, how about apologizing to the retired Peace Officer, you blowhard?
    Jury selection is jury selection, Detective.

    You said so yourself.
  • trubluetrublue Member Posts: 3,042
    edited May 2022
    You called Sled a liar and showed your civility by calling him a mall cop, asshole.

    I’m very impressed with your vast experience participating in arbitrations.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,462
    edited May 2022
    trublue said:

    You called Sled a mall cop, asshole.

    That's not likely to end anytime soon, Detective.
  • trubluetrublue Member Posts: 3,042
    HHusky said:

    You've obviously lied about your courtroom experience, Mall Cop.
    You’ve proven which of you lacks courtroom experience.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,462
    trublue said:

    You’ve proven which of you lacks courtroom experience.
    Mall cop is full of shit.

    And with all due respect, go fuck yourself.
Sign In or Register to comment.