Torn between two lovers . . .
Comments
-
I realize that anything other than lockstep adherence to your leader is foreign to you but people disagree all the time if they aren't leftist scumbags
Hope this helps -
Who cares?
Shapiro wasn't a Trump guy and didn't vote for him in 2016. He then tolerated him and supported many of his policies. He has been consistent in his criticism of how trump acted after the 2020 election. But you're pea brain thinks this is some big gotcha moment. -
But Ben's a squish, right?RaceBannon said:I realize that anything other than lockstep adherence to your leader is foreign to you but people disagree all the time if they aren't leftist scumbags
Hope this helps -
Pawz?MikeDamone said:Who cares?
-
“The documentary does not make the claim that I think a lot of people are attributing to the documentary,” Shapiro, who also had critiques for some of the fact-checkers, said. “In other words, the process is corrupt and people are violating the law in how they are moving these ballots, but that does not mean that the ballots are being cast by dead people or that they are being punched by somebody in the backroom somewhere.”
Shapiro argued more than cell phone data is needed to prove that “mules” were passing on fraudulent ballots in favor of Biden. He admitted his opinion might make “nobody happy,” considering his conservative audience.
I think the data is really interesting. I think that it’s really suspicious for sure. I think that it is dispositive that this alone shifted the election … or that the election was stolen in the sense that actual fraudulent ballots made the difference between victory and loss for Donald Trump in these states. I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.
Shapiro said he requires more data, but also noted there should be enough suspicious activity for law enforcement to look into the claims.
I would agree with every word of this. Vote harvesting, which is illegal in most states is what won the election for Biden. Once the mail in ballots went out, the fix was in. Dazzler because he is a boot licking toady thinks all conservatives are the same.
-
I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.
ringing endorsement
-
So? Why would he endorse something he disagrees with, ma'am?HHusky said:I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.
ringing endorsement -
So if Ben Shapiro said he believed it H would too
-
Shapiro supports cleaning up our voter rolls and voter ID and is in favor of a greater investigation into the ballot stuffing, just like you right Dazzler? Or does your "agreement" with Shapiro only go so far?HHusky said:I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.
ringing endorsement -
Your argument is with several of the other gals on your team.MikeDamone said:
So? Why would he endorse something he disagrees with, ma'am?HHusky said:I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.
ringing endorsement
