Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Biden wants $33B more to help Ukraine battle Russia

SFGbob
SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
Hey why not? We're just going to print it anyway.

Comments

  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,480 Founders Club
    But why does the US want to see an end to the conflict?

  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,642 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    Hey why not? We're just going to print it anyway.

    But not a dime for the US border. Fuck Joe Biden and the leftards that voted or cheated for him.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,560
    edited April 2022
    I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,642 Standard Supporter

    I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.

    Dictators like Xi don't have a strong history of making rational decisions. Xi is boxed in with debt and demographics and huge environmental problems.
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,171 Founders Club

    I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.

    Do you have a red line number? Why not a trillion dollars? How about $10 trillion? FMfyfe. As if even a fraction of the money is actually going in to fighting Russia. But as long as it makes you feel good.
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    You think 33 billion will be the last donation? How much is the next one? The government just spent a trillion on covid. At some point people on the edges of society will go nuts. The economy was -1.4% Complete disaster.
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,171 Founders Club
    jecornel said:

    You think 33 billion will be the last donation? How much is the next one? The government just spent a trillion on covid. At some point people on the edges of society will go nuts. The economy was -1.4% Complete disaster.

    He must be old and extremely wealthy or he simply doesn't understand the concept of devaluation.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    edited April 2022
    Remember, 10% off the top to “The Big Guy.” Just today Veggie went after Russian Oligarchs. He’s gonna make them pay. Seize their yachts. These are bad guys. Wealthy through ill gotten means.

    Hey Veggie, use their $Billions.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,875 Standard Supporter
    Biden admin is leaking that they have helped Ukraine by providing tech/intel for killing the generals, sink Moskva etc. They really are trying to start a war.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,642 Standard Supporter
    RoadTrip said:

    I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.

    Do you have a red line number? Why not a trillion dollars? How about $10 trillion? FMfyfe. As if even a fraction of the money is actually going in to fighting Russia. But as long as it makes you feel good.
    Remember the trillions we spent on Afghanistan and Iraq? Money well spent. If you are Raytheon.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,560
    edited April 2022
    RoadTrip said:

    I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.

    Do you have a red line number? Why not a trillion dollars? How about $10 trillion? FMfyfe. As if even a fraction of the money is actually going in to fighting Russia. But as long as it makes you feel good.
    We aren't giving them money directly. Aren't we using this money to provide them with anti tank and anti aircraft missiles? $33B is a drop in the bucket when it comes to the costs facing Russia. If the US can help cripple Russia, it will take an immediate military threat away. Ideally, this can lead to being able to cut back on some military spending, even though we probably won't. I don't have a hardline figure. I think it's LIPO time. We'll spend based on Russia's progress or lack there of.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,642 Standard Supporter
    Lots of cash for everyone. So, if Putin decided to mine the Strait of Hormuz as a retaliation, then what? That would cripple the West. At this point, I don't see the US working to give Putin an off ramp.

    =========

    As AP reports, Biden’s latest proposal - which the officials said was expected to last for five months - has more than $20 billion in military assistance for Ukraine and for bolstering defenses in nearby countries.

    There is also $8.5 billion in economic aid to help keep Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s government functioning and $3 billion for food and humanitarian programs to help civilians and other spending, said the officials, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly.

    The proposal would more than double the initial $13.6 billion package of defense and economic aid for Ukraine and Western allies that Congress enacted last month.

    Biden last week warned that $6.5 billion earmarked for security assistance for Ukraine could soon be “exhausted” and that Congress would need to approve supplemental funding. More than half of the approved money for weapons and equipment for Ukraine’s military has already been drawn down.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-live-president-biden-explains-why-ukraine-needs-another-33-billion-us-taxpayer

    RoadTrip said:

    I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.

    Do you have a red line number? Why not a trillion dollars? How about $10 trillion? FMfyfe. As if even a fraction of the money is actually going in to fighting Russia. But as long as it makes you feel good.
    We aren't giving them money directly. Aren't we using this money to provide them with anti tank and anti aircraft missiles? $33B is a drop in the bucket when it comes to the costs facing Russia. If the US can help cripple Russia, it will take an immediate military threat away. Ideally, this can lead to being able to cut back on some military spending, even though we probably won't. I don't have a hardline figure. I think it's LIPO time. We'll spend based on Russia's progress or lack there of.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,560
    edited April 2022

    Lots of cash for everyone. So, if Putin decided to mine the Strait of Hormuz as a retaliation, then what? That would cripple the West. At this point, I don't see the US working to give Putin an off ramp.

    =========

    As AP reports, Biden’s latest proposal - which the officials said was expected to last for five months - has more than $20 billion in military assistance for Ukraine and for bolstering defenses in nearby countries.

    There is also $8.5 billion in economic aid to help keep Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s government functioning and $3 billion for food and humanitarian programs to help civilians and other spending, said the officials, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly.

    The proposal would more than double the initial $13.6 billion package of defense and economic aid for Ukraine and Western allies that Congress enacted last month.

    Biden last week warned that $6.5 billion earmarked for security assistance for Ukraine could soon be “exhausted” and that Congress would need to approve supplemental funding. More than half of the approved money for weapons and equipment for Ukraine’s military has already been drawn down.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-live-president-biden-explains-why-ukraine-needs-another-33-billion-us-taxpayer

    RoadTrip said:

    I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.

    Do you have a red line number? Why not a trillion dollars? How about $10 trillion? FMfyfe. As if even a fraction of the money is actually going in to fighting Russia. But as long as it makes you feel good.
    We aren't giving them money directly. Aren't we using this money to provide them with anti tank and anti aircraft missiles? $33B is a drop in the bucket when it comes to the costs facing Russia. If the US can help cripple Russia, it will take an immediate military threat away. Ideally, this can lead to being able to cut back on some military spending, even though we probably won't. I don't have a hardline figure. I think it's LIPO time. We'll spend based on Russia's progress or lack there of.
    well shit...

    Couldn't the Ukrainians just sell the abandoned Russian tanks for scrap?
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,171 Founders Club

    Lots of cash for everyone. So, if Putin decided to mine the Strait of Hormuz as a retaliation, then what? That would cripple the West. At this point, I don't see the US working to give Putin an off ramp.

    =========

    As AP reports, Biden’s latest proposal - which the officials said was expected to last for five months - has more than $20 billion in military assistance for Ukraine and for bolstering defenses in nearby countries.

    There is also $8.5 billion in economic aid to help keep Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s government functioning and $3 billion for food and humanitarian programs to help civilians and other spending, said the officials, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly.

    The proposal would more than double the initial $13.6 billion package of defense and economic aid for Ukraine and Western allies that Congress enacted last month.

    Biden last week warned that $6.5 billion earmarked for security assistance for Ukraine could soon be “exhausted” and that Congress would need to approve supplemental funding. More than half of the approved money for weapons and equipment for Ukraine’s military has already been drawn down.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-live-president-biden-explains-why-ukraine-needs-another-33-billion-us-taxpayer

    RoadTrip said:

    I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.

    Do you have a red line number? Why not a trillion dollars? How about $10 trillion? FMfyfe. As if even a fraction of the money is actually going in to fighting Russia. But as long as it makes you feel good.
    We aren't giving them money directly. Aren't we using this money to provide them with anti tank and anti aircraft missiles? $33B is a drop in the bucket when it comes to the costs facing Russia. If the US can help cripple Russia, it will take an immediate military threat away. Ideally, this can lead to being able to cut back on some military spending, even though we probably won't. I don't have a hardline figure. I think it's LIPO time. We'll spend based on Russia's progress or lack there of.
    Oh yes, we must make the comedian another billionaire. Everyone knows the presidency in the Ukraine pays well.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    SFGbob said:

    Hey why not? We're just going to print it anyway.

    I’m hearing the republicans won’t cooperate to get the deficit down.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    jecornel said:

    You think 33 billion will be the last donation? How much is the next one? The government just spent a trillion on covid. At some point people on the edges of society will go nuts. The economy was -1.4% Complete disaster.

    What are you talking about? We're loaded. We about ready to forgive rich people's student load debt. We can print money with the best of them.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    Hey why not? We're just going to print it anyway.

    I’m hearing the republicans won’t cooperate to get the deficit down.
    If the rich would just pay their fair share we wouldn't have this deficit.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    Lots of cash for everyone. So, if Putin decided to mine the Strait of Hormuz as a retaliation, then what? That would cripple the West. At this point, I don't see the US working to give Putin an off ramp.

    =========

    As AP reports, Biden’s latest proposal - which the officials said was expected to last for five months - has more than $20 billion in military assistance for Ukraine and for bolstering defenses in nearby countries.

    There is also $8.5 billion in economic aid to help keep Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s government functioning and $3 billion for food and humanitarian programs to help civilians and other spending, said the officials, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly.

    The proposal would more than double the initial $13.6 billion package of defense and economic aid for Ukraine and Western allies that Congress enacted last month.

    Biden last week warned that $6.5 billion earmarked for security assistance for Ukraine could soon be “exhausted” and that Congress would need to approve supplemental funding. More than half of the approved money for weapons and equipment for Ukraine’s military has already been drawn down.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-live-president-biden-explains-why-ukraine-needs-another-33-billion-us-taxpayer

    RoadTrip said:

    I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.

    Do you have a red line number? Why not a trillion dollars? How about $10 trillion? FMfyfe. As if even a fraction of the money is actually going in to fighting Russia. But as long as it makes you feel good.
    We aren't giving them money directly. Aren't we using this money to provide them with anti tank and anti aircraft missiles? $33B is a drop in the bucket when it comes to the costs facing Russia. If the US can help cripple Russia, it will take an immediate military threat away. Ideally, this can lead to being able to cut back on some military spending, even though we probably won't. I don't have a hardline figure. I think it's LIPO time. We'll spend based on Russia's progress or lack there of.
    Are we even trying to negotiate a cease fire?
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    SFGbob said:

    Lots of cash for everyone. So, if Putin decided to mine the Strait of Hormuz as a retaliation, then what? That would cripple the West. At this point, I don't see the US working to give Putin an off ramp.

    =========

    As AP reports, Biden’s latest proposal - which the officials said was expected to last for five months - has more than $20 billion in military assistance for Ukraine and for bolstering defenses in nearby countries.

    There is also $8.5 billion in economic aid to help keep Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s government functioning and $3 billion for food and humanitarian programs to help civilians and other spending, said the officials, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly.

    The proposal would more than double the initial $13.6 billion package of defense and economic aid for Ukraine and Western allies that Congress enacted last month.

    Biden last week warned that $6.5 billion earmarked for security assistance for Ukraine could soon be “exhausted” and that Congress would need to approve supplemental funding. More than half of the approved money for weapons and equipment for Ukraine’s military has already been drawn down.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-live-president-biden-explains-why-ukraine-needs-another-33-billion-us-taxpayer

    RoadTrip said:

    I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.

    Do you have a red line number? Why not a trillion dollars? How about $10 trillion? FMfyfe. As if even a fraction of the money is actually going in to fighting Russia. But as long as it makes you feel good.
    We aren't giving them money directly. Aren't we using this money to provide them with anti tank and anti aircraft missiles? $33B is a drop in the bucket when it comes to the costs facing Russia. If the US can help cripple Russia, it will take an immediate military threat away. Ideally, this can lead to being able to cut back on some military spending, even though we probably won't. I don't have a hardline figure. I think it's LIPO time. We'll spend based on Russia's progress or lack there of.
    Are we even trying to negotiate a cease fire?
    NO. Not until the military industrial complex and Pentagon give The Veggie in Chief the okay sign.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,642 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    jecornel said:

    You think 33 billion will be the last donation? How much is the next one? The government just spent a trillion on covid. At some point people on the edges of society will go nuts. The economy was -1.4% Complete disaster.

    What are you talking about? We're loaded. We about ready to forgive rich people's student load debt. We can print money with the best of them.
    Thank god that Milton Friedman isn't in charge anymore and the dementia patient has repealed the law of gravity and printing money will no longer be the cause of inflation.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    jecornel said:

    You think 33 billion will be the last donation? How much is the next one? The government just spent a trillion on covid. At some point people on the edges of society will go nuts. The economy was -1.4% Complete disaster.

    What are you talking about? We're loaded. We about ready to forgive rich people's student load debt. We can print money with the best of them.
    Thank god that Milton Friedman isn't in charge anymore and the dementia patient has repealed the law of gravity and printing money will no longer be the cause of inflation.
    Weird how the guy who was all about voting for the more fiscally responsible alternative doesn't have a problem with any of this spending.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,642 Standard Supporter
    Let's play reverse the players. We are in Iraq and the Russian's are giving long range missiles to Iran who import them into Iraq and then are launching missiles into American military bases in Poland and Germany. They also take out a US aircraft carrier operating in international waters which Russian intelligence identified and located for Iran. What then happens?
    SFGbob said:

    Lots of cash for everyone. So, if Putin decided to mine the Strait of Hormuz as a retaliation, then what? That would cripple the West. At this point, I don't see the US working to give Putin an off ramp.

    =========

    As AP reports, Biden’s latest proposal - which the officials said was expected to last for five months - has more than $20 billion in military assistance for Ukraine and for bolstering defenses in nearby countries.

    There is also $8.5 billion in economic aid to help keep Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s government functioning and $3 billion for food and humanitarian programs to help civilians and other spending, said the officials, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly.

    The proposal would more than double the initial $13.6 billion package of defense and economic aid for Ukraine and Western allies that Congress enacted last month.

    Biden last week warned that $6.5 billion earmarked for security assistance for Ukraine could soon be “exhausted” and that Congress would need to approve supplemental funding. More than half of the approved money for weapons and equipment for Ukraine’s military has already been drawn down.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-live-president-biden-explains-why-ukraine-needs-another-33-billion-us-taxpayer

    RoadTrip said:

    I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.

    Do you have a red line number? Why not a trillion dollars? How about $10 trillion? FMfyfe. As if even a fraction of the money is actually going in to fighting Russia. But as long as it makes you feel good.
    We aren't giving them money directly. Aren't we using this money to provide them with anti tank and anti aircraft missiles? $33B is a drop in the bucket when it comes to the costs facing Russia. If the US can help cripple Russia, it will take an immediate military threat away. Ideally, this can lead to being able to cut back on some military spending, even though we probably won't. I don't have a hardline figure. I think it's LIPO time. We'll spend based on Russia's progress or lack there of.
    Are we even trying to negotiate a cease fire?
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,480 Founders Club

    Let's play reverse the players. We are in Iraq and the Russian's are giving long range missiles to Iran who import them into Iraq and then are launching missiles into American military bases in Poland and Germany. They also take out a US aircraft carrier operating in international waters which Russian intelligence identified and located for Iran. What then happens?

    SFGbob said:

    Lots of cash for everyone. So, if Putin decided to mine the Strait of Hormuz as a retaliation, then what? That would cripple the West. At this point, I don't see the US working to give Putin an off ramp.

    =========

    As AP reports, Biden’s latest proposal - which the officials said was expected to last for five months - has more than $20 billion in military assistance for Ukraine and for bolstering defenses in nearby countries.

    There is also $8.5 billion in economic aid to help keep Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s government functioning and $3 billion for food and humanitarian programs to help civilians and other spending, said the officials, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly.

    The proposal would more than double the initial $13.6 billion package of defense and economic aid for Ukraine and Western allies that Congress enacted last month.

    Biden last week warned that $6.5 billion earmarked for security assistance for Ukraine could soon be “exhausted” and that Congress would need to approve supplemental funding. More than half of the approved money for weapons and equipment for Ukraine’s military has already been drawn down.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-live-president-biden-explains-why-ukraine-needs-another-33-billion-us-taxpayer

    RoadTrip said:

    I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.

    Do you have a red line number? Why not a trillion dollars? How about $10 trillion? FMfyfe. As if even a fraction of the money is actually going in to fighting Russia. But as long as it makes you feel good.
    We aren't giving them money directly. Aren't we using this money to provide them with anti tank and anti aircraft missiles? $33B is a drop in the bucket when it comes to the costs facing Russia. If the US can help cripple Russia, it will take an immediate military threat away. Ideally, this can lead to being able to cut back on some military spending, even though we probably won't. I don't have a hardline figure. I think it's LIPO time. We'll spend based on Russia's progress or lack there of.
    Are we even trying to negotiate a cease fire?
    In before @GDS FO vote.

  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 8,001 Standard Supporter
    edited April 2022
    Sledog said:

    Biden admin is leaking that they have helped Ukraine by providing tech/intel for killing the generals, sink Moskva etc. They really are trying to start a war.

    Yeah that's dumb to admit... we all knew it, but don't announce it you idiots.