Biden wants $33B more to help Ukraine battle Russia

Comments
-
But why does the US want to see an end to the conflict?
-
But not a dime for the US border. Fuck Joe Biden and the leftards that voted or cheated for him.SFGbob said:Hey why not? We're just going to print it anyway.
-
I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.
-
Dictators like Xi don't have a strong history of making rational decisions. Xi is boxed in with debt and demographics and huge environmental problems.greenblood said:I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.
-
Do you have a red line number? Why not a trillion dollars? How about $10 trillion? FMfyfe. As if even a fraction of the money is actually going in to fighting Russia. But as long as it makes you feel good.greenblood said:I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.
-
You think 33 billion will be the last donation? How much is the next one? The government just spent a trillion on covid. At some point people on the edges of society will go nuts. The economy was -1.4% Complete disaster.
-
He must be old and extremely wealthy or he simply doesn't understand the concept of devaluation.jecornel said:You think 33 billion will be the last donation? How much is the next one? The government just spent a trillion on covid. At some point people on the edges of society will go nuts. The economy was -1.4% Complete disaster.
-
Russia has nukes
Making them desperate seems like a bad idea -
Remember, 10% off the top to “The Big Guy.” Just today Veggie went after Russian Oligarchs. He’s gonna make them pay. Seize their yachts. These are bad guys. Wealthy through ill gotten means.
Hey Veggie, use their $Billions. -
Biden admin is leaking that they have helped Ukraine by providing tech/intel for killing the generals, sink Moskva etc. They really are trying to start a war.
-
Remember the trillions we spent on Afghanistan and Iraq? Money well spent. If you are Raytheon.RoadTrip said:
Do you have a red line number? Why not a trillion dollars? How about $10 trillion? FMfyfe. As if even a fraction of the money is actually going in to fighting Russia. But as long as it makes you feel good.greenblood said:I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.
-
We aren't giving them money directly. Aren't we using this money to provide them with anti tank and anti aircraft missiles? $33B is a drop in the bucket when it comes to the costs facing Russia. If the US can help cripple Russia, it will take an immediate military threat away. Ideally, this can lead to being able to cut back on some military spending, even though we probably won't. I don't have a hardline figure. I think it's LIPO time. We'll spend based on Russia's progress or lack there of.RoadTrip said:
Do you have a red line number? Why not a trillion dollars? How about $10 trillion? FMfyfe. As if even a fraction of the money is actually going in to fighting Russia. But as long as it makes you feel good.greenblood said:I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.
-
Lots of cash for everyone. So, if Putin decided to mine the Strait of Hormuz as a retaliation, then what? That would cripple the West. At this point, I don't see the US working to give Putin an off ramp.
=========
As AP reports, Biden’s latest proposal - which the officials said was expected to last for five months - has more than $20 billion in military assistance for Ukraine and for bolstering defenses in nearby countries.
There is also $8.5 billion in economic aid to help keep Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s government functioning and $3 billion for food and humanitarian programs to help civilians and other spending, said the officials, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly.
The proposal would more than double the initial $13.6 billion package of defense and economic aid for Ukraine and Western allies that Congress enacted last month.
Biden last week warned that $6.5 billion earmarked for security assistance for Ukraine could soon be “exhausted” and that Congress would need to approve supplemental funding. More than half of the approved money for weapons and equipment for Ukraine’s military has already been drawn down.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-live-president-biden-explains-why-ukraine-needs-another-33-billion-us-taxpayergreenblood said:
We aren't giving them money directly. Aren't we using this money to provide them with anti tank and anti aircraft missiles? $33B is a drop in the bucket when it comes to the costs facing Russia. If the US can help cripple Russia, it will take an immediate military threat away. Ideally, this can lead to being able to cut back on some military spending, even though we probably won't. I don't have a hardline figure. I think it's LIPO time. We'll spend based on Russia's progress or lack there of.RoadTrip said:
Do you have a red line number? Why not a trillion dollars? How about $10 trillion? FMfyfe. As if even a fraction of the money is actually going in to fighting Russia. But as long as it makes you feel good.greenblood said:I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.
-
well shit...WestlinnDuck said:Lots of cash for everyone. So, if Putin decided to mine the Strait of Hormuz as a retaliation, then what? That would cripple the West. At this point, I don't see the US working to give Putin an off ramp.
=========
As AP reports, Biden’s latest proposal - which the officials said was expected to last for five months - has more than $20 billion in military assistance for Ukraine and for bolstering defenses in nearby countries.
There is also $8.5 billion in economic aid to help keep Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s government functioning and $3 billion for food and humanitarian programs to help civilians and other spending, said the officials, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly.
The proposal would more than double the initial $13.6 billion package of defense and economic aid for Ukraine and Western allies that Congress enacted last month.
Biden last week warned that $6.5 billion earmarked for security assistance for Ukraine could soon be “exhausted” and that Congress would need to approve supplemental funding. More than half of the approved money for weapons and equipment for Ukraine’s military has already been drawn down.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-live-president-biden-explains-why-ukraine-needs-another-33-billion-us-taxpayergreenblood said:
We aren't giving them money directly. Aren't we using this money to provide them with anti tank and anti aircraft missiles? $33B is a drop in the bucket when it comes to the costs facing Russia. If the US can help cripple Russia, it will take an immediate military threat away. Ideally, this can lead to being able to cut back on some military spending, even though we probably won't. I don't have a hardline figure. I think it's LIPO time. We'll spend based on Russia's progress or lack there of.RoadTrip said:
Do you have a red line number? Why not a trillion dollars? How about $10 trillion? FMfyfe. As if even a fraction of the money is actually going in to fighting Russia. But as long as it makes you feel good.greenblood said:I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.
Couldn't the Ukrainians just sell the abandoned Russian tanks for scrap? -
Oh yes, we must make the comedian another billionaire. Everyone knows the presidency in the Ukraine pays well.WestlinnDuck said:Lots of cash for everyone. So, if Putin decided to mine the Strait of Hormuz as a retaliation, then what? That would cripple the West. At this point, I don't see the US working to give Putin an off ramp.
=========
As AP reports, Biden’s latest proposal - which the officials said was expected to last for five months - has more than $20 billion in military assistance for Ukraine and for bolstering defenses in nearby countries.
There is also $8.5 billion in economic aid to help keep Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s government functioning and $3 billion for food and humanitarian programs to help civilians and other spending, said the officials, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly.
The proposal would more than double the initial $13.6 billion package of defense and economic aid for Ukraine and Western allies that Congress enacted last month.
Biden last week warned that $6.5 billion earmarked for security assistance for Ukraine could soon be “exhausted” and that Congress would need to approve supplemental funding. More than half of the approved money for weapons and equipment for Ukraine’s military has already been drawn down.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-live-president-biden-explains-why-ukraine-needs-another-33-billion-us-taxpayergreenblood said:
We aren't giving them money directly. Aren't we using this money to provide them with anti tank and anti aircraft missiles? $33B is a drop in the bucket when it comes to the costs facing Russia. If the US can help cripple Russia, it will take an immediate military threat away. Ideally, this can lead to being able to cut back on some military spending, even though we probably won't. I don't have a hardline figure. I think it's LIPO time. We'll spend based on Russia's progress or lack there of.RoadTrip said:
Do you have a red line number? Why not a trillion dollars? How about $10 trillion? FMfyfe. As if even a fraction of the money is actually going in to fighting Russia. But as long as it makes you feel good.greenblood said:I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.
-
I’m hearing the republicans won’t cooperate to get the deficit down.SFGbob said:Hey why not? We're just going to print it anyway.
-
What are you talking about? We're loaded. We about ready to forgive rich people's student load debt. We can print money with the best of them.jecornel said:You think 33 billion will be the last donation? How much is the next one? The government just spent a trillion on covid. At some point people on the edges of society will go nuts. The economy was -1.4% Complete disaster.
-
If the rich would just pay their fair share we wouldn't have this deficit.MikeDamone said:
I’m hearing the republicans won’t cooperate to get the deficit down.SFGbob said:Hey why not? We're just going to print it anyway.
-
Are we even trying to negotiate a cease fire?WestlinnDuck said:Lots of cash for everyone. So, if Putin decided to mine the Strait of Hormuz as a retaliation, then what? That would cripple the West. At this point, I don't see the US working to give Putin an off ramp.
=========
As AP reports, Biden’s latest proposal - which the officials said was expected to last for five months - has more than $20 billion in military assistance for Ukraine and for bolstering defenses in nearby countries.
There is also $8.5 billion in economic aid to help keep Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s government functioning and $3 billion for food and humanitarian programs to help civilians and other spending, said the officials, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly.
The proposal would more than double the initial $13.6 billion package of defense and economic aid for Ukraine and Western allies that Congress enacted last month.
Biden last week warned that $6.5 billion earmarked for security assistance for Ukraine could soon be “exhausted” and that Congress would need to approve supplemental funding. More than half of the approved money for weapons and equipment for Ukraine’s military has already been drawn down.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-live-president-biden-explains-why-ukraine-needs-another-33-billion-us-taxpayergreenblood said:
We aren't giving them money directly. Aren't we using this money to provide them with anti tank and anti aircraft missiles? $33B is a drop in the bucket when it comes to the costs facing Russia. If the US can help cripple Russia, it will take an immediate military threat away. Ideally, this can lead to being able to cut back on some military spending, even though we probably won't. I don't have a hardline figure. I think it's LIPO time. We'll spend based on Russia's progress or lack there of.RoadTrip said:
Do you have a red line number? Why not a trillion dollars? How about $10 trillion? FMfyfe. As if even a fraction of the money is actually going in to fighting Russia. But as long as it makes you feel good.greenblood said:I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.
-
NO. Not until the military industrial complex and Pentagon give The Veggie in Chief the okay sign.SFGbob said:
Are we even trying to negotiate a cease fire?WestlinnDuck said:Lots of cash for everyone. So, if Putin decided to mine the Strait of Hormuz as a retaliation, then what? That would cripple the West. At this point, I don't see the US working to give Putin an off ramp.
=========
As AP reports, Biden’s latest proposal - which the officials said was expected to last for five months - has more than $20 billion in military assistance for Ukraine and for bolstering defenses in nearby countries.
There is also $8.5 billion in economic aid to help keep Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s government functioning and $3 billion for food and humanitarian programs to help civilians and other spending, said the officials, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly.
The proposal would more than double the initial $13.6 billion package of defense and economic aid for Ukraine and Western allies that Congress enacted last month.
Biden last week warned that $6.5 billion earmarked for security assistance for Ukraine could soon be “exhausted” and that Congress would need to approve supplemental funding. More than half of the approved money for weapons and equipment for Ukraine’s military has already been drawn down.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-live-president-biden-explains-why-ukraine-needs-another-33-billion-us-taxpayergreenblood said:
We aren't giving them money directly. Aren't we using this money to provide them with anti tank and anti aircraft missiles? $33B is a drop in the bucket when it comes to the costs facing Russia. If the US can help cripple Russia, it will take an immediate military threat away. Ideally, this can lead to being able to cut back on some military spending, even though we probably won't. I don't have a hardline figure. I think it's LIPO time. We'll spend based on Russia's progress or lack there of.RoadTrip said:
Do you have a red line number? Why not a trillion dollars? How about $10 trillion? FMfyfe. As if even a fraction of the money is actually going in to fighting Russia. But as long as it makes you feel good.greenblood said:I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.
-
Thank god that Milton Friedman isn't in charge anymore and the dementia patient has repealed the law of gravity and printing money will no longer be the cause of inflation.SFGbob said:
What are you talking about? We're loaded. We about ready to forgive rich people's student load debt. We can print money with the best of them.jecornel said:You think 33 billion will be the last donation? How much is the next one? The government just spent a trillion on covid. At some point people on the edges of society will go nuts. The economy was -1.4% Complete disaster.
-
Weird how the guy who was all about voting for the more fiscally responsible alternative doesn't have a problem with any of this spending.WestlinnDuck said:
Thank god that Milton Friedman isn't in charge anymore and the dementia patient has repealed the law of gravity and printing money will no longer be the cause of inflation.SFGbob said:
What are you talking about? We're loaded. We about ready to forgive rich people's student load debt. We can print money with the best of them.jecornel said:You think 33 billion will be the last donation? How much is the next one? The government just spent a trillion on covid. At some point people on the edges of society will go nuts. The economy was -1.4% Complete disaster.
-
Let's play reverse the players. We are in Iraq and the Russian's are giving long range missiles to Iran who import them into Iraq and then are launching missiles into American military bases in Poland and Germany. They also take out a US aircraft carrier operating in international waters which Russian intelligence identified and located for Iran. What then happens?SFGbob said:
Are we even trying to negotiate a cease fire?WestlinnDuck said:Lots of cash for everyone. So, if Putin decided to mine the Strait of Hormuz as a retaliation, then what? That would cripple the West. At this point, I don't see the US working to give Putin an off ramp.
=========
As AP reports, Biden’s latest proposal - which the officials said was expected to last for five months - has more than $20 billion in military assistance for Ukraine and for bolstering defenses in nearby countries.
There is also $8.5 billion in economic aid to help keep Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s government functioning and $3 billion for food and humanitarian programs to help civilians and other spending, said the officials, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly.
The proposal would more than double the initial $13.6 billion package of defense and economic aid for Ukraine and Western allies that Congress enacted last month.
Biden last week warned that $6.5 billion earmarked for security assistance for Ukraine could soon be “exhausted” and that Congress would need to approve supplemental funding. More than half of the approved money for weapons and equipment for Ukraine’s military has already been drawn down.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-live-president-biden-explains-why-ukraine-needs-another-33-billion-us-taxpayergreenblood said:
We aren't giving them money directly. Aren't we using this money to provide them with anti tank and anti aircraft missiles? $33B is a drop in the bucket when it comes to the costs facing Russia. If the US can help cripple Russia, it will take an immediate military threat away. Ideally, this can lead to being able to cut back on some military spending, even though we probably won't. I don't have a hardline figure. I think it's LIPO time. We'll spend based on Russia's progress or lack there of.RoadTrip said:
Do you have a red line number? Why not a trillion dollars? How about $10 trillion? FMfyfe. As if even a fraction of the money is actually going in to fighting Russia. But as long as it makes you feel good.greenblood said:I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.
-
In before @GDS FO vote.WestlinnDuck said:Let's play reverse the players. We are in Iraq and the Russian's are giving long range missiles to Iran who import them into Iraq and then are launching missiles into American military bases in Poland and Germany. They also take out a US aircraft carrier operating in international waters which Russian intelligence identified and located for Iran. What then happens?
SFGbob said:
Are we even trying to negotiate a cease fire?WestlinnDuck said:Lots of cash for everyone. So, if Putin decided to mine the Strait of Hormuz as a retaliation, then what? That would cripple the West. At this point, I don't see the US working to give Putin an off ramp.
=========
As AP reports, Biden’s latest proposal - which the officials said was expected to last for five months - has more than $20 billion in military assistance for Ukraine and for bolstering defenses in nearby countries.
There is also $8.5 billion in economic aid to help keep Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s government functioning and $3 billion for food and humanitarian programs to help civilians and other spending, said the officials, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly.
The proposal would more than double the initial $13.6 billion package of defense and economic aid for Ukraine and Western allies that Congress enacted last month.
Biden last week warned that $6.5 billion earmarked for security assistance for Ukraine could soon be “exhausted” and that Congress would need to approve supplemental funding. More than half of the approved money for weapons and equipment for Ukraine’s military has already been drawn down.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-live-president-biden-explains-why-ukraine-needs-another-33-billion-us-taxpayergreenblood said:
We aren't giving them money directly. Aren't we using this money to provide them with anti tank and anti aircraft missiles? $33B is a drop in the bucket when it comes to the costs facing Russia. If the US can help cripple Russia, it will take an immediate military threat away. Ideally, this can lead to being able to cut back on some military spending, even though we probably won't. I don't have a hardline figure. I think it's LIPO time. We'll spend based on Russia's progress or lack there of.RoadTrip said:
Do you have a red line number? Why not a trillion dollars? How about $10 trillion? FMfyfe. As if even a fraction of the money is actually going in to fighting Russia. But as long as it makes you feel good.greenblood said:I actually don't have a huge problem with this. The longer the Ukraine war goes, the more likely Russia is to crumble from the inside out. Russia collapsing isn't directly great, because nobody views Russia as an economic threat anyway. The real benefit is indirectly, as it puts a lot more pressure on China. China was gravitating more and more with Russia, thinking they could use Russia to help strongarm military objectives in the south pacific. China now seeing that their new "buddy" is nothing more than a paper army, has to scare the shit out of them. This may force China to calm itself, and realize that it needs to know it's place.
-
Yeah that's dumb to admit... we all knew it, but don't announce it you idiots.Sledog said:Biden admin is leaking that they have helped Ukraine by providing tech/intel for killing the generals, sink Moskva etc. They really are trying to start a war.