Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Kimmy at it again
Sancho
Member Posts: 251
Dawgman board rules updated What a cunt
"Respectfully disagreeing with the moderators is fine. Disagreeing with the OPINIONS of the moderators is fair game. Challenging the CREDIBILITY of the moderators is not. Attacking Dawgman/247Sports Administrators, Moderators, or the business will result in revoking your ability to post. The difference of opinions is always great. Crossing lines is not. "
"Respectfully disagreeing with the moderators is fine. Disagreeing with the OPINIONS of the moderators is fair game. Challenging the CREDIBILITY of the moderators is not. Attacking Dawgman/247Sports Administrators, Moderators, or the business will result in revoking your ability to post. The difference of opinions is always great. Crossing lines is not. "
Comments
I say that.
"RudeDawg said... (original post) I've had posts where I mention "Great article in the Athletic for those with a subscription" removed recently and I never link them..."
That’s probably because others below you in the thread did.
Guys this isn’t complicated. You can come up with a zillion scenarios and we are not going to sit here and game every single one of them out for you. Common sense when you read the rule is that anyone who covers practice on a daily basis = competitor. "