Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Questioning the outcome of an election is okay...
Comments
-
I'm sure you talked out your ass and are now pathtically comparing a demand that NATO members pay their obligations is a "threat" to the Alliance.HHusky said:
I'm sure calling NATO "obsolete" inspired enormous confidence.SFGbob said:
Trying to get NATO members to pay their share is a threat to the NATO alliance.PurpleThrobber said:
Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.HHusky said:
Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.WestlinnDuck said:
Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?SFGbob said:
Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.HHusky said:
Your argument is with every serious person in either party.SFGbob said:
The statement isn't factualHHusky said:
Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.SFGbob said:
I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.HHusky said:
So when is she going to be installed as President?SFGbob said:
No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.HHusky said:Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.
Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.
I haven't moved.
Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.
Good luck.
It's tuff!
Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative. -
<
So you prefer not to deal with the comment, which our allies seized upon, for obvious reasons.SFGbob said:
I'm sure you talked out your ass and are now pathtically comparing a demand that NATO members pay their obligations is a "threat" to the Alliance.HHusky said:
I'm sure calling NATO "obsolete" inspired enormous confidence.SFGbob said:
Trying to get NATO members to pay their share is a threat to the NATO alliance.PurpleThrobber said:
Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.HHusky said:
Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.WestlinnDuck said:
Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?SFGbob said:
Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.HHusky said:
Your argument is with every serious person in either party.SFGbob said:
The statement isn't factualHHusky said:
Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.SFGbob said:
I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.HHusky said:
So when is she going to be installed as President?SFGbob said:
No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.HHusky said:Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.
Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.
I haven't moved.
Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.
Good luck.
It's tuff!
Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative.
Or his failure to reaffirm Article 5 when that reaffirmation had been promised.
An awful lot of Daddy's bitching about supposed unpaid obligations proved to be spurious, btw.
But he didn't weaken the alliance. Obviously.
-
The fuck are you babbling about now?HHusky said:
PT is a gal who never ever would have told the Emperor he had no clothes on.PurpleThrobber said:
Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.HHusky said:
Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.WestlinnDuck said:
Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?SFGbob said:
Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.HHusky said:
Your argument is with every serious person in either party.SFGbob said:
The statement isn't factualHHusky said:
Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.SFGbob said:
I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.HHusky said:
So when is she going to be installed as President?SFGbob said:
No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.HHusky said:Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.
Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.
I haven't moved.
Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.
Good luck.
It's tuff!
Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative.
-
You mean our "allies" who were free riding off of the American taxpayer for years were upset when they were publicly called out for it and asked to stop being such deadbeats? Those allies?HHusky said:<
So you prefer not to deal with the comment, which our allies seized upon, for obvious reasons.SFGbob said:
I'm sure you talked out your ass and are now pathtically comparing a demand that NATO members pay their obligations is a "threat" to the Alliance.HHusky said:
I'm sure calling NATO "obsolete" inspired enormous confidence.SFGbob said:
Trying to get NATO members to pay their share is a threat to the NATO alliance.PurpleThrobber said:
Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.HHusky said:
Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.WestlinnDuck said:
Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?SFGbob said:
Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.HHusky said:
Your argument is with every serious person in either party.SFGbob said:
The statement isn't factualHHusky said:
Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.SFGbob said:
I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.HHusky said:
So when is she going to be installed as President?SFGbob said:
No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.HHusky said:Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.
Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.
I haven't moved.
Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.
Good luck.
It's tuff!
Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative.
Or his failure to reaffirm Article 5 when that reaffirmation had been promised.
An awful lot of Daddy's bitching about supposed unpaid obligations proved to be spurious, btw.
But he didn't weaken the alliance. Obviously. -
That was always hyperbole.SFGbob said:
You mean our "allies" who were free riding off of the American taxpayer for years were upset when they were publicly called out for it and asked to stop being such deadbeats? Those allies?HHusky said:<
So you prefer not to deal with the comment, which our allies seized upon, for obvious reasons.SFGbob said:
I'm sure you talked out your ass and are now pathtically comparing a demand that NATO members pay their obligations is a "threat" to the Alliance.HHusky said:
I'm sure calling NATO "obsolete" inspired enormous confidence.SFGbob said:
Trying to get NATO members to pay their share is a threat to the NATO alliance.PurpleThrobber said:
Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.HHusky said:
Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.WestlinnDuck said:
Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?SFGbob said:
Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.HHusky said:
Your argument is with every serious person in either party.SFGbob said:
The statement isn't factualHHusky said:
Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.SFGbob said:
I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.HHusky said:
So when is she going to be installed as President?SFGbob said:
No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.HHusky said:Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.
Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.
I haven't moved.
Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.
Good luck.
It's tuff!
Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative.
Or his failure to reaffirm Article 5 when that reaffirmation had been promised.
An awful lot of Daddy's bitching about supposed unpaid obligations proved to be spurious, btw.
But he didn't weaken the alliance. Obviously. -
Look at Mr. photo ID is Jim Crow 2.0 complain about hyperbole.HHusky said:
That was always hyperbole.SFGbob said:
You mean our "allies" who were free riding off of the American taxpayer for years were upset when they were publicly called out for it and asked to stop being such deadbeats? Those allies?HHusky said:<
So you prefer not to deal with the comment, which our allies seized upon, for obvious reasons.SFGbob said:
I'm sure you talked out your ass and are now pathtically comparing a demand that NATO members pay their obligations is a "threat" to the Alliance.HHusky said:
I'm sure calling NATO "obsolete" inspired enormous confidence.SFGbob said:
Trying to get NATO members to pay their share is a threat to the NATO alliance.PurpleThrobber said:
Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.HHusky said:
Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.WestlinnDuck said:
Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?SFGbob said:
Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.HHusky said:
Your argument is with every serious person in either party.SFGbob said:
The statement isn't factualHHusky said:
Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.SFGbob said:
I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.HHusky said:
So when is she going to be installed as President?SFGbob said:
No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.HHusky said:Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.
Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.
I haven't moved.
Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.
Good luck.
It's tuff!
Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative.
Or his failure to reaffirm Article 5 when that reaffirmation had been promised.
An awful lot of Daddy's bitching about supposed unpaid obligations proved to be spurious, btw.
But he didn't weaken the alliance. Obviously. -
"Many countries owe us a tremendous amount of money from many years back, where they're delinquent as far as I'm concerned, because the United States has had to pay for them. So if you go back 10 or 20 years, you'll just add it all up, it's massive amounts of money is owed." -- President Daddy
I was far too fair in calling it "hyperbole".
There wasn't a speck of truth in this. He made it up. -
Really? Everyone was paying what they were supposed to be paying? For a guy who loves to flyspeck other people's words you sure a lying piece of shit yourself Dazzler.HHusky said:"Many countries owe us a tremendous amount of money from many years back, where they're delinquent as far as I'm concerned, because the United States has had to pay for them. So if you go back 10 or 20 years, you'll just add it all up, it's massive amounts of money is owed." -- President Daddy
I was far too fair in calling it "hyperbole".
There wasn't a speck of truth in this. He made it up. -
Fuck off.HHusky said:"Many countries owe us a tremendous amount of money from many years back, where they're delinquent as far as I'm concerned, because the United States has had to pay for them. So if you go back 10 or 20 years, you'll just add it all up, it's massive amounts of money is owed." -- President Daddy
I was far too fair in calling it "hyperbole".
There wasn't a speck of truth in this. He made it up.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/11/trumps-nato-criticism-is-valid-europe-isnt-spending-enough-on-def.html
Pay the agreed upon 2% or EMFA. These countries are supposedly so much more enlightened than the US with their social spending, but then can’t “afford” their basic obligations to defense. -
Not a speck of that is the truth.MikeDamone said:
Fuck off.HHusky said:"Many countries owe us a tremendous amount of money from many years back, where they're delinquent as far as I'm concerned, because the United States has had to pay for them. So if you go back 10 or 20 years, you'll just add it all up, it's massive amounts of money is owed." -- President Daddy
I was far too fair in calling it "hyperbole".
There wasn't a speck of truth in this. He made it up.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/11/trumps-nato-criticism-is-valid-europe-isnt-spending-enough-on-def.html
Pay the agreed upon 2% or EMFA. These countries are supposedly so much more enlightened than the US with their social spending, but then can’t “afford” their basic obligations to defense. -
Worse than hyperbole, ladySFGbob said:
Not a speck of that is the truth.MikeDamone said:
Fuck off.HHusky said:"Many countries owe us a tremendous amount of money from many years back, where they're delinquent as far as I'm concerned, because the United States has had to pay for them. So if you go back 10 or 20 years, you'll just add it all up, it's massive amounts of money is owed." -- President Daddy
I was far too fair in calling it "hyperbole".
There wasn't a speck of truth in this. He made it up.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/11/trumps-nato-criticism-is-valid-europe-isnt-spending-enough-on-def.html
Pay the agreed upon 2% or EMFA. These countries are supposedly so much more enlightened than the US with their social spending, but then can’t “afford” their basic obligations to defense. -
Again with the elitist of anything populistHHusky said:
Your argument is with every serious person in either party.SFGbob said:
The statement isn't factualHHusky said:
Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.SFGbob said:
I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.HHusky said:
So when is she going to be installed as President?SFGbob said:
No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.HHusky said:Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.
Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.
I haven't moved.
Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.
Good luck.
I hope LaPen wins so you'll lose it, along with all the commie wokes
He made them pay their fair share. MonsterHHusky said:
The subject is whether the NATO alliance was threatened by Daddy's presidency.Pitchfork51 said:
I'm hearing trump tried to start ww3HHusky said:
PT is a gal who never ever would have told the Emperor he had no clothes on.PurpleThrobber said:
Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.HHusky said:
Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.WestlinnDuck said:
Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?SFGbob said:
Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.HHusky said:
Your argument is with every serious person in either party.SFGbob said:
The statement isn't factualHHusky said:
Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.SFGbob said:
I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.HHusky said:
So when is she going to be installed as President?SFGbob said:
No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.HHusky said:Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.
Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.
I haven't moved.
Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.
Good luck.
It's tuff!
Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative.
But even if he didn't he left the situation for it
When does Biden become culpable for shit.
And honestly I don't care about Ukraine.
Unless we must import Ukrainian women along with venezuelan women. Maybe this is our moral prerogative
I'm happy to agree that Biden is very much to blame for NATO's resurgence. -
Why did Cho reneg on the 1994 deal where we promised Ukraine that if they gave up their Nukes, NATO would not allow Russia to attack them?HHusky said:<
So you prefer not to deal with the comment, which our allies seized upon, for obvious reasons.SFGbob said:
I'm sure you talked out your ass and are now pathtically comparing a demand that NATO members pay their obligations is a "threat" to the Alliance.HHusky said:
I'm sure calling NATO "obsolete" inspired enormous confidence.SFGbob said:
Trying to get NATO members to pay their share is a threat to the NATO alliance.PurpleThrobber said:
Threatened the NATO alliance. Classic.HHusky said:
Gasbag is having a hard time seeing why the guy who threatened the NATO alliance and tried to remove sanctions on Russia as one of his very first acts was preferred by Putin.WestlinnDuck said:
Like PIPS's non-explanation about why Putin would prefer a pro-American pro-energy independent Trump versus an America hating PIPS who supports open borders and energy dependence. The next question is how did Putin "steal" the election?SFGbob said:
Lot of words to just say you were talking out your ass Dazzler. And of course dodging the question you were asked like the lying Kunt you are was expected.HHusky said:
Your argument is with every serious person in either party.SFGbob said:
The statement isn't factualHHusky said:
Russia wanted Daddy to win and interfered in the election. That statement is factual and beyond serious debate.SFGbob said:
I don't know, I've not made the claim that either Hillary or Trump will be installed as President. Fact still stands, she knew she had idiots like you who would swallow like bitches the Russian collusion fraud. She knew that she had the help of the Obama DOJ, FBI and CIA. And she knew that she had people like you in her corner who would happily lie their asses off for her, and turn a blind eye to her paying Russians for dirt in order to impact the 2016 election.HHusky said:
So when is she going to be installed as President?SFGbob said:
No need to do that. She knew she already had the permanent bureaucracy, the MSM, the National Security state and useful idiots like you in her corner available to carry out all the dirty work she needed.HHusky said:Should have filed 63 lawsuits and had her followers storm the Capitol.
Did Daddy win because of Russia's interference? No way of knowing.
I haven't moved.
Now I realize that serves this populist "pox on both your houses" instinct you and the other gals gravitate to. But the politics of grievance isn't really a cohesive, lasting movement, and judging by one of your posts today, you yourself are ready to jettison the singular personality that allowed your cult hold together for a while.
Good luck.
It's tuff!
Tell us another whiteboard hoax lie, Dazzler. Along with the famous Russian state narrative.
Or his failure to reaffirm Article 5 when that reaffirmation had been promised.
An awful lot of Daddy's bitching about supposed unpaid obligations proved to be spurious, btw.
But he didn't weaken the alliance. Obviously.
