Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

She defends pedophiles and the Senate Rats protect her

2»

Comments

  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,777 Founders Club
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited March 2022
    Herr Dazzler loves to protect abusers. Why? What's in it for him?



    They should get due process, a fair trial, and a sentence that fits the crime. Consuming is no different than producing. Her argument seems to be that in the past a pedo had to get physical pictures so it was harder to collect a lot. Now the internet makes it easier to get thousands of pictures so without the internet, the pedo wouldn't have as many. Or maybe even none. So they should get a lighter sentence. Solid.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 18,019 Standard Supporter

    Herr Dazzler loves to protect abusers. Why? What's in it for him?



    They should get due process, a fair trial, and a sentence that fits the crime. Consuming is no different than producing. Her argument seems to be that in the past a pedo had to get physical pictures so it was harder to collect a lot. Now the internet makes it easier to get thousands of pictures so without the internet, the pedo wouldn't have as many. Or maybe even none. So they should get a lighter sentence. Solid.

    So, the demand for child porn goes up so more child porn is made which requires more children involved with, as the dazzler put it, "sick images". Definitely, deserving of materially lighter sentencing. Just don't make is some moral issue. Think of the real victim.
  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 8,102 Standard Supporter

    Herr Dazzler loves to protect abusers. Why? What's in it for him?



    They should get due process, a fair trial, and a sentence that fits the crime. Consuming is no different than producing. Her argument seems to be that in the past a pedo had to get physical pictures so it was harder to collect a lot. Now the internet makes it easier to get thousands of pictures so without the internet, the pedo wouldn't have as many. Or maybe even none. So they should get a lighter sentence. Solid.

    So, the demand for child porn goes up so more child porn is made which requires more children involved with, as the dazzler put it, "sick images". Definitely, deserving of materially lighter sentencing. Just don't make is some moral issue. Think of the real victim.
    The real victim, you mean the black pedophile?
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 18,019 Standard Supporter
    Goduckies said:

    Herr Dazzler loves to protect abusers. Why? What's in it for him?



    They should get due process, a fair trial, and a sentence that fits the crime. Consuming is no different than producing. Her argument seems to be that in the past a pedo had to get physical pictures so it was harder to collect a lot. Now the internet makes it easier to get thousands of pictures so without the internet, the pedo wouldn't have as many. Or maybe even none. So they should get a lighter sentence. Solid.

    So, the demand for child porn goes up so more child porn is made which requires more children involved with, as the dazzler put it, "sick images". Definitely, deserving of materially lighter sentencing. Just don't make is some moral issue. Think of the real victim.
    The real victim, you mean the black pedophile?
    Black or white. That's Jackson's view. She is a pedo apologist.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 18,019 Standard Supporter
    And Bezos thought that putting, "Democracy dies in darkness" on his paper was some sort of great virtue signaling.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    WaPo is not a newspaper. It’s a DIM newsletter.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    Herr Dazzler loves to protect abusers. Why? What's in it for him?



    They should get due process, a fair trial, and a sentence that fits the crime. Consuming is no different than producing. Her argument seems to be that in the past a pedo had to get physical pictures so it was harder to collect a lot. Now the internet makes it easier to get thousands of pictures so without the internet, the pedo wouldn't have as many. Or maybe even none. So they should get a lighter sentence. Solid.

    So, the demand for child porn goes up so more child porn is made which requires more children involved with, as the dazzler put it, "sick images". Definitely, deserving of materially lighter sentencing. Just don't make is some moral issue. Think of the real victim.
    You noticed Herr Dazzlers softening of the description too. He can’t say child pornography. It gets characterized as “sick images”. The same as a picture of a pile of dog shit.