Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
AZ Audit Finds 74,000 Ballots Returned and Counted in 2020 Election with NO RECORD of Being Sent Out
DerekJohnson
Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,304 
in Tug Tavern
Comments
-
Yeah, the fix was in. Another piece of proof for the rat media to ignore.
-
That's the issue with mail in, no chain of custody, that's why it is so hard to prove fraud, it's inherent in the system, it's also why HR1 has Mail voting in it, the Democrats know they stole 2020 from that and want it permanent.
-
Our Democracy was almost lost.
-
But we need more of this. To want fair elections is to be racist.Goduckies said:That's the issue with mail in, no chain of custody, that's why it is so hard to prove fraud, it's inherent in the system, it's also why HR1 has Mail voting in it, the Democrats know they stole 2020 from that and want it permanent.
-
HH will tell you it didn't happen.
-
it is all fake news and, as usual, I await @RaceBannon Mello downvoting before I make up my mind
-
I think it was Penn that had 200K of the same. No effect on the election. Miniscule voter fraud. Not big at all. Most secure election ever. If you were a democrat candidate anyway.
-
Right you are. It didn't happen.Sledog said:HH will tell you it didn't happen.
Why does everybody say you're so dumb? -
Mail in voting fraud 100% happened and happens every election that has it. Its impossible to track. That's why my lib poli Sci professor hated it. Zero chain of custody.HHusky said:
Right you are. It didn't happen.Sledog said:HH will tell you it didn't happen.
Why does everybody say you're so dumb? -
Still a story, huh? Ok then.
-
Which is exactly what you said about Covid lab leak theory.HHusky said: -
https://nbcnews.com/politics/elections/pennsylvania-court-tosses-state-s-mail-voting-law-n1288170Sledog said:I think it was Penn that had 200K of the same. No effect on the election. Miniscule voter fraud. Not big at all. Most secure election ever. If you were a democrat candidate anyway.
Pennsylvania just broke their constitution. Not a big deal. Quite common really
A Pennsylvania court struck down the state’s mail voting law Friday morning, saying voters must amend the state constitution before such legislation is legal.
The state immediately appealed the ruling to the state Supreme Court, meaning the law will remain in effect during the appeal process. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court is composed of five Democrats and two Republicans.
In her ruling earlier Friday, Commonwealth Court Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt, a Republican, wrote: “No-excuse mail-in voting makes the exercise of the franchise more convenient and has been used four times in the history of Pennsylvania. If presented to the people, a constitutional amendment to end the Article VII, Section 1 requirement of in-person voting is likely to be adopted. But a constitutional amendment must be presented to the people and adopted into our fundamental law before legislation authorizing no-excuse mail-in voting can 'be placed upon our statute books'. -
Is this the Kraken?
-
Back in the day when elections were rigged
-
-
You haven't been following that story very closely, I see.SFGbob said: -
-
And I see blob's not the only one who hasn't kept up.RaceBannon said: -
If you supported dishonest elections, what would you do differently from what the dazzler and the dems are supporting. They pretty much have it covered. The fact that the dazzler won't tell you that if you don't have internal controls, then there is going to be fraud and dishonesty lets you know all about his mythical MBA.RaceBannon said: -
Yes you have the secretHHusky said:
And I see blob's not the only one who hasn't kept up.RaceBannon said:
-
Yep. Big secret . . . to people who get their news from gatewaypundit.RaceBannon said:
Yes you have the secretHHusky said:
And I see blob's not the only one who hasn't kept up.RaceBannon said: -
I don’t see a source or link from you . . . CNN?
Just more diarrhea from your mouth, “Counselor”? -
Another sleuth on the case!trublue said:I don’t see a source or link from you . . . CNN?
Just more diarrhea from your mouth, “Counselor”. -
Wasn't this asshole citing Rolling Stone just last week?HHusky said:
Yep. Big secret . . . to people who get their news from gatewaypundit.RaceBannon said:
Yes you have the secretHHusky said:
And I see blob's not the only one who hasn't kept up.RaceBannon said: -
Pretty obvious H is lying as usual
Yawn -
-
Looks like I do keep up to date
-
You were for the people involved in this research before you were against them.
-
Take the L liarHHusky said:You were for the people involved in this research before you were against them.
